By: tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com), June 9, 2013 2:00 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Kevin G (kevin.delete@this.cubitdesigns.com) on June 8, 2013 2:18 pm wrote:
> John (Jngu14.delete@this.gmail.com) on June 8, 2013 6:28 am wrote:
> > Jason (oxkct.delete@this.7tags.com) on June 7, 2013 1:56 pm wrote:
> > > I guess this explains why Samsung went with Intel over their own Exynos on the Galaxy
> > > Tab. Look at how the Lenovo K800 (Atom) compared to Galaxy S4 (Exynos/SnapDragon) :
> A bit of Google-fu points toward any relevant information being behind a paywall at
> ABI Research. Everywhere else seems to be parroting the same Business Wire story.
If anyone's interested, the ABI post acting as advertising for this work can be found here. It has some interesting comment I'm not really sure why they talk about current draw instead of power...it's a rather odd story.
> John (Jngu14.delete@this.gmail.com) on June 8, 2013 6:28 am wrote:
> > Jason (oxkct.delete@this.7tags.com) on June 7, 2013 1:56 pm wrote:
> > > I guess this explains why Samsung went with Intel over their own Exynos on the Galaxy
> > > Tab. Look at how the Lenovo K800 (Atom) compared to Galaxy S4 (Exynos/SnapDragon) :
> A bit of Google-fu points toward any relevant information being behind a paywall at
> ABI Research. Everywhere else seems to be parroting the same Business Wire story.
If anyone's interested, the ABI post acting as advertising for this work can be found here. It has some interesting comment I'm not really sure why they talk about current draw instead of power...it's a rather odd story.
