none (none.delete@this.none.com) on June 9, 2013 3:11 pm wrote:
> tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com) on June 9, 2013 2:00 pm wrote:
> > Kevin G (kevin.delete@this.cubitdesigns.com) on June 8, 2013 2:18 pm wrote:
> > > John (Jngu14.delete@this.gmail.com) on June 8, 2013 6:28 am wrote:
> > > > Jason (oxkct.delete@this.7tags.com) on June 7, 2013 1:56 pm wrote:
> > > > > I guess this explains why Samsung went with Intel over their own Exynos on the Galaxy
> > > > > Tab. Look at how the Lenovo K800 (Atom) compared to Galaxy S4 (Exynos/SnapDragon) :
> >
> > > A bit of Google-fu points toward any relevant information being behind a paywall at
> > > ABI Research. Everywhere else seems to be parroting the same Business Wire story.
> >
> > If anyone's interested, the ABI post acting as advertising for this work can
> > be found here. It has some interesting comment I'm not really sure why they
> > talk about current draw instead of power...it's a rather odd story.
>
> And I bet most of their benchmarks are from AnTuTu which seems to be the only CPU benchmark favoring Intel.

It seems that indeed AnTuTu has a heavy bias towards Intel and that Abi Research used it:

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&itc=eetimes_sitedefault&doc_id=1318857