By: none (none.delete@this.none.com), July 18, 2013 7:47 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on July 18, 2013 6:44 am wrote:
> none (none.delete@this.none.com) on July 18, 2013 4:15 am wrote:
> > Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra.delete@this.ntlworld.com) on July 18, 2013 4:07 am wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Note that AnTuTu decided to go back to using GCC in their next version. Hopefully
> > > they also manage to find the -O3 option in GCC, not easy I know...
> >
> > I hope Google will find it too.
>
> I hope they don't.
> gcc -O3 is way to aggressive to be a default.
> For default I'd take something like "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing".
Indeed. I was not preaching for -O3, but -Os certainly stinks a lot. I'd like the Thumb flags to be the same as the ARM ones.
Why would you want no strict aliasing?
> none (none.delete@this.none.com) on July 18, 2013 4:15 am wrote:
> > Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra.delete@this.ntlworld.com) on July 18, 2013 4:07 am wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Note that AnTuTu decided to go back to using GCC in their next version. Hopefully
> > > they also manage to find the -O3 option in GCC, not easy I know...
> >
> > I hope Google will find it too.
>
> I hope they don't.
> gcc -O3 is way to aggressive to be a default.
> For default I'd take something like "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing".
Indeed. I was not preaching for -O3, but -Os certainly stinks a lot. I'd like the Thumb flags to be the same as the ARM ones.
Why would you want no strict aliasing?