By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), July 19, 2013 2:31 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
> Remember this is 20 year old code - compilers were pretty dumb, volatile was new and practically
> unused/unknown. ByteMark never gained much popularity, it disappeared as quickly as it
> emerged - I never imagined that someone would use it as a mobile benchmark. By far the
> best solution is to never use this code, especially not as a RAM benchmark...
Actually, I find AnTuTu to be quite annoying. Their site doesn't say anything about them at all. Who are the people behind it? Who is funding this? How do they make their money?
At this point, I'd basically ignore anything based on AnTuTu, since they've proved they are wretched at actually devising useful benchmarks.
David
> unused/unknown. ByteMark never gained much popularity, it disappeared as quickly as it
> emerged - I never imagined that someone would use it as a mobile benchmark. By far the
> best solution is to never use this code, especially not as a RAM benchmark...
Actually, I find AnTuTu to be quite annoying. Their site doesn't say anything about them at all. Who are the people behind it? Who is funding this? How do they make their money?
At this point, I'd basically ignore anything based on AnTuTu, since they've proved they are wretched at actually devising useful benchmarks.
David
