By: mas (a.delete@this.b.com), July 17, 2013 5:20 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301
compared to other relevant chips
vs 1.6 GHz Exynos 5 (A15)
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2112298
vs 1.9 GHz Tegra 4 (A15)
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2025974
vs 1.9 GHz S600
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/1999761
vs 2.3 GHz S800
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2063809
vs 1.8 GHz Clovertrail
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2138712
vs 2.0 GHz Clovertrail+
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2161128
vs 1.4 GHz Ivy Bridge Y
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2027454
vs 1.0 GHz AMD A6-1450
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2157740
vs 1.5 GHz AMD A4-5000
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2139838
compared to other relevant chips
vs 1.6 GHz Exynos 5 (A15)
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2112298
vs 1.9 GHz Tegra 4 (A15)
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2025974
vs 1.9 GHz S600
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/1999761
vs 2.3 GHz S800
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2063809
vs 1.8 GHz Clovertrail
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2138712
vs 2.0 GHz Clovertrail+
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2161128
vs 1.4 GHz Ivy Bridge Y
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2027454
vs 1.0 GHz AMD A6-1450
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2157740
vs 1.5 GHz AMD A4-5000
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/2068301/2139838
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/07/17 05:20 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/07/17 05:20 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/07/17 05:49 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Klimax | 2013/07/17 07:54 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/07/17 10:02 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/07/17 11:58 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/07/17 02:42 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/07/17 02:59 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Wilco | 2013/07/17 03:07 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | anon | 2013/07/17 06:02 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | someone | 2013/07/17 07:57 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Megol | 2013/07/17 09:45 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/07/17 10:01 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Wilco | 2013/07/17 11:40 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Megol | 2013/07/18 01:44 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/07/19 01:58 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/07/19 02:17 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/07/19 03:13 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Megol | 2013/07/20 10:33 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/07/17 10:20 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | someone | 2013/07/17 10:31 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/07/17 11:03 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/07/17 11:04 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/19 03:52 AM |
Nope | Wilco | 2013/07/19 04:58 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/19 05:33 AM |
Nope | none | 2013/07/19 06:08 AM |
Nope | Wilco | 2013/07/19 07:16 AM |
Nope | Michael S | 2013/07/19 07:40 AM |
Nope | tarlinian | 2013/07/19 08:59 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/19 02:12 PM |
Nope | none | 2013/07/19 04:59 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/19 05:17 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/19 05:46 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/19 06:08 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/20 03:01 PM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/20 07:04 PM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/21 12:29 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/21 02:38 AM |
s/10/5 (NT) | anon | 2013/07/21 02:40 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/21 04:13 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/21 04:46 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/22 03:45 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/22 04:53 AM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/23 05:56 AM |
Nope | anon | 2013/07/23 09:48 PM |
Nope | Doug S | 2013/07/21 09:36 AM |
Nope | anonymou5 | 2013/07/21 04:24 PM |
Apple & 14nm | Doug S | 2013/07/19 10:14 AM |
It is "Common Platform" Alliance vs. TSMC, not Samsung vs TSMC | Mark Roulo | 2013/07/19 01:12 PM |
It is "Common Platform" Alliance vs. TSMC, not Samsung vs TSMC | Doug S | 2013/07/19 02:01 PM |
It is "Common Platform" Alliance vs. TSMC, not Samsung vs TSMC | Alberto | 2013/07/19 03:32 PM |
Nope | Michael S | 2013/07/20 12:22 PM |
Nope | Alberto | 2013/07/20 02:24 PM |
Nope | Doug S | 2013/07/20 03:08 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Wilco | 2013/07/17 11:46 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Klimax | 2013/07/17 01:10 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Wilco | 2013/07/17 03:15 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Klimax | 2013/07/17 11:25 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/08/16 08:13 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | Alberto | 2013/08/18 05:57 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | Linus Torvalds | 2013/08/18 09:42 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | Alberto | 2013/08/18 12:45 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | ABR | 2013/08/18 11:56 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | ABR | 2013/08/19 12:28 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench and some so so SPEC data | Alberto | 2013/08/19 01:02 AM |
Athlon 64 FX-55 had a TDP of 104W and was $827 in 2004 (NT) | iz | 2013/08/19 01:37 AM |
Yes sure, five process nodes ago, come one | Alberto | 2013/08/19 04:24 AM |
Yes sure, five process nodes ago, come one | anon | 2013/08/19 04:51 AM |
Yes sure, five process nodes ago, come one | Alberto | 2013/08/19 06:34 AM |
Yes sure, five process nodes ago, come one | anon | 2013/08/19 10:20 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/18 06:11 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/05 05:14 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/05 12:57 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Linus Torvalds | 2013/08/05 01:21 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/05 04:10 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/05 05:59 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/06 12:30 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/06 01:15 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/06 02:58 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Exophase | 2013/08/06 08:51 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Gabriele Svelto | 2013/08/07 03:55 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Foo_ | 2013/08/10 05:28 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Gabriele Svelto | 2013/08/12 12:58 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Foo_ | 2013/08/12 03:07 PM |
FP in Java Script | David Kanter | 2013/08/10 04:10 AM |
FP in Java Script | EduardoS | 2013/08/10 07:25 AM |
FP in Java Script | ⚛ | 2013/08/11 12:44 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/08/06 01:27 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/06 02:08 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/08/06 03:06 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Exophase | 2013/08/06 09:00 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/08/06 10:04 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Exophase | 2013/08/06 10:40 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Exophase | 2013/08/06 10:41 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/06 01:36 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/06 03:30 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/07 01:20 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Michael S | 2013/08/07 01:45 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | mas | 2013/08/07 02:20 PM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | none | 2013/08/08 12:55 AM |
1.46 GHz Bay Trail geekbench | Alberto | 2013/08/05 04:09 PM |