Article: AMD's Jaguar Microarchitecture
By: someone (someone.delete@this.somewhere.com), April 4, 2014 7:18 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Ricky Chan (qcmadness.delete@this.yahoo.com.hk) on April 3, 2014 7:50 am wrote:
> Now I have a question. As Jaguar is now optimized to move around different foundries,
> how would Jaguar behave if it is optimized specifically for TSMC or Globalfoundries?
> Would it consume 30% less power while clocked 10-20% higher?
Nowhere close to that, probably more like a tenth of that gain.
What you suggested would be a superb result for a full process node shrink.
> Now I have a question. As Jaguar is now optimized to move around different foundries,
> how would Jaguar behave if it is optimized specifically for TSMC or Globalfoundries?
> Would it consume 30% less power while clocked 10-20% higher?
Nowhere close to that, probably more like a tenth of that gain.
What you suggested would be a superb result for a full process node shrink.
