By: Rob Thorpe (rthorpe.delete@this.robertthorpeconsulting.com), May 13, 2014 6:30 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
> Probably, much less than the contribution of the clock distribution network.
I didn't know the clock distribution network was so bad. In that case it makes sense why they're not worried about adding a DLL with it's additional noise.
I agree with everything else you say.
I didn't know the clock distribution network was so bad. In that case it makes sense why they're not worried about adding a DLL with it's additional noise.
I agree with everything else you say.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | David Kanter | 2014/05/06 01:33 PM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | itsmydamnation | 2014/05/06 11:12 PM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Xi Yang | 2014/05/07 12:08 AM |
Decoupling capacitors on GPUs | Gabriele Svelto | 2014/05/08 09:24 AM |
Decoupling capacitors on GPUs | Ben | 2014/08/27 11:56 PM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Poindexter | 2014/05/10 06:06 PM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Rob Thorpe | 2014/05/12 05:42 AM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | David Hess | 2014/05/12 10:02 AM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Rob Thorpe | 2014/05/12 10:46 AM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Ricardo B | 2014/05/13 03:15 AM |
New article: Adaptive Clocking in AMD’s Steamroller | Rob Thorpe | 2014/05/13 06:30 AM |
Multiple PLLs wouldn't work, but DLL jitter is no problem | Robyn Henry | 2014/05/14 12:58 AM |