By: vvid (no.delete@this.thanks.com), August 5, 2014 9:51 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on August 4, 2014 8:01 am wrote:
> Being able to run processes on two different CPUs
> at the same time won't be easy, but perhaps the fact OS X uses the Mach microkernel would make
> this slightly easier than it would be for Linux or Windows to attempt such a thing.
Funny, even on Amiga500 I used both AmigaOS and DOS simultaneously (with 68k+286 dual processor board)
Nowadays you could just push fat executable in the store for any supported arch (Windows is not here yet)
> Being able to run processes on two different CPUs
> at the same time won't be easy, but perhaps the fact OS X uses the Mach microkernel would make
> this slightly easier than it would be for Linux or Windows to attempt such a thing.
Funny, even on Amiga500 I used both AmigaOS and DOS simultaneously (with 68k+286 dual processor board)
Nowadays you could just push fat executable in the store for any supported arch (Windows is not here yet)