Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on August 5, 2014 2:11 pm wrote:
> vvid (no.delete@this.thanks.com) on August 5, 2014 9:51 am wrote:
> > Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on August 4, 2014 8:01 am wrote:
> > > Being able to run processes on two different CPUs
> > > at the same time won't be easy, but perhaps the fact OS X uses the Mach microkernel would make
> > > this slightly easier than it would be for Linux or Windows to attempt such a thing.
> >
> > Funny, even on Amiga500 I used both AmigaOS and DOS simultaneously (with 68k+286 dual processor board)
> > Nowadays you could just push fat executable in the store for any supported arch (Windows is not here yet)
>
>
> I was thinking about them both running on the same kernel (i.e. the VM running
> Windows is just another process on OS X) That's not what the Amiga was doing.


I should probably clarify here that by that I mean sharing the same memory space, and the x86 interfacing with the OS X kernel as necessary to be able to add memory, share devices and so on as VMware would do when running x86 OS X with a x86 VM.