juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 8, 2014 12:09 pm wrote:
> Megol (golem960.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 8, 2014 11:23 am wrote:
> > juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 8, 2014 10:49 am wrote:
> > >
> > > They compared older hardware. Migrating from SB-i7 to HW-i7 introduces little benefits
> > > in performance (except when using new AVX2 extensions to x86) but in ARM each gen is
> > > not a mere 5-10% faster than former gen but much more. Their choice favored x86.
> >
> > 5-10% is a huge difference given that it results from slight
> > polishing. I have to say this point is nonsense.
>
> My point has been ignored.
You'd first have to have point in the first place!

You may not ever ignore base when comparing percentages. Which you just did. 5-10% when base is high is completely different then 50% from low base.

10% vs. 50% is in context of x86 versus ARM meaningless number, because ARM isn't even close to Sandy Bridge.

Your point is nonsensical and is completely wrong.

For some reason you have ignored evolution of Atom... because it demolishes entire thesis and your point.