Klimax (danklima.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 8, 2014 1:12 pm wrote:
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 8, 2014 12:09 pm wrote:
> > Megol (golem960.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 8, 2014 11:23 am wrote:
> > > juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 8, 2014 10:49 am wrote:
> > > >
> > > > They compared older hardware. Migrating from SB-i7 to HW-i7 introduces little benefits
> > > > in performance (except when using new AVX2 extensions to x86) but in ARM each gen is
> > > > not a mere 5-10% faster than former gen but much more. Their choice favored x86.
> > >
> > > 5-10% is a huge difference given that it results from slight
> > > polishing. I have to say this point is nonsense.
> >
> > My point has been ignored.
> You'd first have to have point in the first place!
>
> You may not ever ignore base when comparing percentages. Which you just did.
> 5-10% when base is high is completely different then 50% from low base.
>
> 10% vs. 50% is in context of x86 versus ARM meaningless
> number, because ARM isn't even close to Sandy Bridge.
>
> Your point is nonsensical and is completely wrong.
>
> For some reason you have ignored evolution of Atom... because it demolishes entire thesis and your point.

I notice that my point continue being ignored.