By: Aaron Spink (aaronspink.delete@this.notearthlink.net), August 9, 2014 7:43 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 9, 2014 5:57 am wrote:
> X-Gene, Thunder-X, Vulcan... The most promising for me is Vulcan: eight-fetch and six-issue
> per cycle, 60-entry unified scheduler, 180-Entry ROB, 2048-entry TLB, 64KB L1 (8-way),
> 256KB L2 (8-way), 3 ALU, 256bit SIMD unit, SMT4, up to 16 cores on die, 3GHz...
>
Yes and I'm working on a 96 fetch, 64 issue, 60k-entry unified scheduler, 180k entry ROB, 2048M entry TLB, 64MB L1(80-way), 256GB L2 (8000-way), 30 alu, 2560bit SIMD unit, SMT4K, up to 32 thousand cores on die, 3Thz design....
You do realize that more CPU are DOA than are ever delivered right? Lets talk when things are actually released and have real world numbers backing them up instead of a list of specifications.
> X-Gene, Thunder-X, Vulcan... The most promising for me is Vulcan: eight-fetch and six-issue
> per cycle, 60-entry unified scheduler, 180-Entry ROB, 2048-entry TLB, 64KB L1 (8-way),
> 256KB L2 (8-way), 3 ALU, 256bit SIMD unit, SMT4, up to 16 cores on die, 3GHz...
>
Yes and I'm working on a 96 fetch, 64 issue, 60k-entry unified scheduler, 180k entry ROB, 2048M entry TLB, 64MB L1(80-way), 256GB L2 (8000-way), 30 alu, 2560bit SIMD unit, SMT4K, up to 32 thousand cores on die, 3Thz design....
You do realize that more CPU are DOA than are ever delivered right? Lets talk when things are actually released and have real world numbers backing them up instead of a list of specifications.
