By: juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com), August 9, 2014 8:06 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Aaron Spink (aaronspink.delete@this.notearthlink.net) on August 9, 2014 7:43 am wrote:
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 9, 2014 5:57 am wrote:
> > X-Gene, Thunder-X, Vulcan... The most promising for me is Vulcan: eight-fetch and six-issue
> > per cycle, 60-entry unified scheduler, 180-Entry ROB, 2048-entry TLB, 64KB L1 (8-way),
> > 256KB L2 (8-way), 3 ALU, 256bit SIMD unit, SMT4, up to 16 cores on die, 3GHz...
> >
>
>
>
> You do realize that more CPU are DOA than are ever delivered right? Lets talk when things are actually
> released and have real world numbers backing them up instead of a list of specifications.
He asked me for details of the architecture. I have given some relevant details. What is your problem?
Anyone with minimum knowledge of architecture will understand the above arch is not for phones, you can ask me for benchmarks.
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 9, 2014 5:57 am wrote:
> > X-Gene, Thunder-X, Vulcan... The most promising for me is Vulcan: eight-fetch and six-issue
> > per cycle, 60-entry unified scheduler, 180-Entry ROB, 2048-entry TLB, 64KB L1 (8-way),
> > 256KB L2 (8-way), 3 ALU, 256bit SIMD unit, SMT4, up to 16 cores on die, 3GHz...
> >
>
>
>
> You do realize that more CPU are DOA than are ever delivered right? Lets talk when things are actually
> released and have real world numbers backing them up instead of a list of specifications.
He asked me for details of the architecture. I have given some relevant details. What is your problem?
Anyone with minimum knowledge of architecture will understand the above arch is not for phones, you can ask me for benchmarks.
