By: David Hess (davidwhess.delete@this.gmail.com), August 11, 2014 11:56 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Alberto (git.delete@this.git.it) on August 11, 2014 2:57 am wrote:
>
> Nope, Samsung has canned the ARM server cpu:
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323243
>
> About Apple: no news, only old voices likely broken.
> About Broadcom: it is not a credible server cpu maker.
> About AMD: all depends on money and time, IMO a 2017/2018 thing. A new x86 cpu is the first thing to do.
> In this moment Amd is pressing hard for a 20 core x86 server cpu on 14nm out at the end of 2016.
>
> Other contenders are out of the games; no experience means----->failure in server space
There is a related EETimes article:
http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323463
One of the comments says nVidia's project Denver is dead and includes a link:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9249291/Nvidia_abandons_64_bit_Denver_chip_for_servers
>
> Nope, Samsung has canned the ARM server cpu:
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323243
>
> About Apple: no news, only old voices likely broken.
> About Broadcom: it is not a credible server cpu maker.
> About AMD: all depends on money and time, IMO a 2017/2018 thing. A new x86 cpu is the first thing to do.
> In this moment Amd is pressing hard for a 20 core x86 server cpu on 14nm out at the end of 2016.
>
> Other contenders are out of the games; no experience means----->failure in server space
There is a related EETimes article:
http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323463
One of the comments says nVidia's project Denver is dead and includes a link:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9249291/Nvidia_abandons_64_bit_Denver_chip_for_servers