David Hess (davidwhess.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 11, 2014 11:56 am wrote:
> Alberto (git.delete@this.git.it) on August 11, 2014 2:57 am wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Samsung has canned the ARM server cpu:
> >
> > http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323243
> >
> > About Apple: no news, only old voices likely broken.
> > About Broadcom: it is not a credible server cpu maker.
> > About AMD: all depends on money and time, IMO a 2017/2018 thing. A new x86 cpu is the first thing to do.
> > In this moment Amd is pressing hard for a 20 core x86 server cpu on 14nm out at the end of 2016.
> >
> > Other contenders are out of the games; no experience means----->failure in server space
>
> There is a related EETimes article:
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1323463
>
> One of the comments says nVidia's project Denver is dead and includes a link:
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9249291/Nvidia_abandons_64_bit_Denver_chip_for_servers
>

Nvidia has just presented officially Denver project, which is alive. They will be giving details at HotCHips.

About Nvidia abandoning Denver for servers... well two or three years ago Nvidia did claim that Denver was only for mobile, not servers. Their server core is Boulder.