By: Klimax (danklima.delete@this.gmail.com), August 11, 2014 10:03 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 11, 2014 6:38 pm wrote:
> Exophase (exophase.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 10, 2014 9:34 pm wrote:
> > David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on August 10, 2014 9:12 pm wrote:
> > > Seriously dude. What 90W ARM server chip is providing performance to customers?
> >
> > I don't even know of a single prospective ARM64 server CPU that
> > has made claims of using 90W per chip in the first place.
>
> I have given a list of companies before. E.g. Cavium has announced SoCs in the 20--95W range
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1322565
No data and it doesn't even exist as anything more then design. At best.
> Exophase (exophase.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 10, 2014 9:34 pm wrote:
> > David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on August 10, 2014 9:12 pm wrote:
> > > Seriously dude. What 90W ARM server chip is providing performance to customers?
> >
> > I don't even know of a single prospective ARM64 server CPU that
> > has made claims of using 90W per chip in the first place.
>
> I have given a list of companies before. E.g. Cavium has announced SoCs in the 20--95W range
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1322565
No data and it doesn't even exist as anything more then design. At best.