By: Aaron Spink (aaronspink.delete@this.notearthlink.net), August 12, 2014 2:11 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 12, 2014 1:58 am wrote:
> Intel used to not just run SPEC on competitor's machines in the lab, but also to
> submit results to official SPEC database. Last time as recently as last month:
> http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q3/cpu2006-20140715-30427.html
>
> Hopefully, they will do it to AMCC.
>
Way back when, I had access to Spec acceptance discussion summaries. First time a non-first party submitted a result there was a bit of a hullabaloo about it. People were saying things like it wasn't fair, etc. Someone then basically said, "well if they think it isn't fair, they can submit a result themselves". Pretty much all the disagreement left the conversation at that point.
> Intel used to not just run SPEC on competitor's machines in the lab, but also to
> submit results to official SPEC database. Last time as recently as last month:
> http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q3/cpu2006-20140715-30427.html
>
> Hopefully, they will do it to AMCC.
>
Way back when, I had access to Spec acceptance discussion summaries. First time a non-first party submitted a result there was a bit of a hullabaloo about it. People were saying things like it wasn't fair, etc. Someone then basically said, "well if they think it isn't fair, they can submit a result themselves". Pretty much all the disagreement left the conversation at that point.
