Ronald Maas (rmaas.delete@this.wiwo.nl) on August 15, 2014 7:40 am wrote:
>
> Hm, David. It seems you are not very open to any positive opinions of upcoming ARM 64-bit processors
> intended for the server space. You are rejecting such claims with arguments like vaporware, unreleased
> products, NDA, not freely available, etc. etc. At the other hand you have no problem to be very
> critical on Broadcom Vulcan which is two years to be released down the road.
>
> I think we could either restrict our opinions on officially released products and verifiable benchmark
> figures, or allow some free (and sometimes wild) thinking about what may be available in the future.
> With the former approach this forum will quickly become very boring. So suggest to go with the latter
> approach. Of cause critical thinking is always welcome, but then a level play field.

For more than decade now we have all server processors in the world delivered by exclusive club of just 5 companies. The whole rest of the world delivered nothing!
So, I understand why David would be highly skeptical when he hears claims coming from non-members of the club.

Now, one Arm64 server claim is coming from withing a club, so it should be taken more seriously.