Amdahl's law (NT)By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), August 17, 2014 10:08 amRoom: Moderated DiscussionsAmdahl's law< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >TopicPosted ByDateAn ARM-based Mac article by GasseeYuhong Bao2014/08/03 01:24 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJoe User2014/08/03 03:51 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 09:06 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeMichael S2014/08/03 11:44 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/04 07:45 AM DiscountsRob Thorpe2014/08/04 12:57 PM DiscountsAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:34 AM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:32 AM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureanon2014/08/06 01:48 PM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureUngo2014/08/06 04:34 PM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureDoug S2014/08/06 08:21 PM The return to irrelevance.Alberto2014/08/07 02:04 AM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJacob Marley2014/08/04 03:07 AM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeanon2014/08/03 09:29 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 10:05 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeNiels Jørgen Kruse2014/08/03 10:32 PM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeex-apple2014/08/04 05:20 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseePatrick Chase2014/08/04 06:51 PM Mac Intel urban legendsWes Felter2014/08/05 07:19 PM Mac Intel urban legendsUngo2014/08/06 02:09 PM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseejuanrga2014/08/04 01:05 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:01 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/04 02:20 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/04 06:46 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:14 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/05 01:11 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:40 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 08:51 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:11 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:15 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 04:42 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/06 05:04 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/08 03:35 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 01:58 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/05 09:27 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Michael S2014/08/08 03:58 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 10:00 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Klimax2014/08/08 12:17 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 03:48 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 05:40 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:51 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 04:57 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/09 06:43 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 07:06 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Jukka Larja2014/08/17 03:40 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 08:50 AM Intel binning advantagePaul A. Clayton2014/08/09 09:58 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ronald Maas2014/08/10 06:12 PM Where is the profit?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 08:23 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/11 02:02 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:41 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 05:01 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 09:10 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/10 09:20 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Mark Roulo2014/08/04 07:43 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Anon2014/08/04 12:17 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Kevin G2014/08/05 10:11 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Ricardo B2014/08/05 01:30 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Maxwell2014/08/04 06:55 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?gallier22014/08/05 12:28 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:48 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:59 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:56 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?rwessel2014/08/05 04:40 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/06 10:59 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/06 02:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/06 04:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/06 10:55 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:54 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:57 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechPatrick Chase2014/08/07 08:39 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 09:49 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/08 10:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 11:09 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/08 12:12 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 03:36 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 12:31 AM Actually, he did.iz2014/08/09 01:05 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:36 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:51 AM Actually, he did.juanrga2014/08/09 04:26 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 10:01 AM Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/10 11:29 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 01:04 PM Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/11 01:52 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/11 10:08 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/08 01:26 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 10:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 01:10 PM x87 taxMichael S2014/08/09 01:37 PM x87 taxKlimax2014/08/10 07:48 AM Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/11 03:07 PM Visual C and x87rwessel2014/08/11 05:32 PM Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/12 08:29 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/11 03:21 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:29 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/09 03:22 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 04:03 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/09 08:55 AM Complexity = f (area, X, Y) not f(area)Paul A. Clayton2014/08/09 12:47 PM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 03:27 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.dmcq2014/08/10 04:09 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 04:53 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/10 05:24 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/10 06:24 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/11 06:05 PM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/11 07:28 PM Stop trollingDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:12 PM Stop trollingExophase2014/08/10 08:34 PM Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsjuanrga2014/08/11 05:38 PM Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsKlimax2014/08/11 09:03 PM Is comparing to highest bin fair?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/11 12:37 AM Is comparing to highest bin fair?David Kanter2014/08/13 11:18 AM What kind of comparison was intended?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/13 03:18 PM Stop ignoring datajuanrga2014/08/11 06:00 PM Stop ignoring dataKlimax2014/08/11 09:06 PM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 01:21 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:24 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:00 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:08 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:25 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 05:29 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 10:19 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 01:08 PM Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called JuanrgaJ Random Hacker2014/08/19 04:47 PM Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called Juanrgaanon2014/08/20 02:46 PM Design targets aren't dataDavid Kanter2014/08/13 12:07 PM I agreejuanrga2014/08/13 02:16 PM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/14 10:37 PM Not again, thanksjuanrga2014/08/15 02:22 AM I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 06:40 AM I agreeMichael S2014/08/15 06:55 AM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:43 AM I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:28 AM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:41 AM I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:39 AM I agreeKlimax2014/08/15 12:57 PM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 02:01 PM on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/15 03:41 PM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 02:15 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 02:56 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 03:39 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 06:52 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 10:21 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 07:51 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/16 08:45 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 09:14 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 09:54 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 10:32 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceSymmetry2014/08/17 05:32 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/17 06:07 AM K12Alexko2014/08/15 04:43 PM K12David Kanter2014/08/15 05:54 PM K12Alexko2014/08/16 02:14 AM K12juanrga2014/08/16 03:34 AM Sorry cannot share any detailsDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:31 AM K12, some guesses/leaksjuanrga2014/08/18 01:48 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 01:56 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Kira2014/08/16 08:07 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:56 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Doug S2014/08/16 09:28 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 11:01 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/16 12:56 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 01:29 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 02:08 PM Metal pitchesDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:20 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 03:14 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 10:49 AM Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:27 AM Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/16 11:45 AM Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 01:16 PM Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/17 01:52 PM History is very usefulDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:18 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsjuanrga2014/08/17 03:33 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:28 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsPurana Archer2014/08/18 02:32 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/18 07:17 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsMaynard Handley2014/08/18 12:36 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/19 12:53 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionstarlinian2014/08/19 12:14 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsAaron Spink2014/08/17 09:10 PM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:36 AM Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/19 02:00 AM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 03:33 AM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 07:17 AM Intel has process advantage.Michael S2014/08/20 07:58 AM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 04:11 PM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 10:49 PM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/21 12:51 AM Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/21 02:05 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/21 01:15 AM Could you please stopDaniel B2014/08/21 03:41 AM Could you please stopanon2014/08/21 08:20 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 11:29 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 01:14 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 02:11 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 09:12 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:16 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:38 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 02:52 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:55 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 03:07 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:40 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingAaron Spink2014/08/26 03:50 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingDavid Kanter2014/08/26 05:25 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:10 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:15 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingMaynard Handley2014/08/26 01:49 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:44 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 09:37 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingDoug S2014/08/25 09:24 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingdmcq2014/08/25 11:17 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:22 AM Are you really that daft?Daniel B2014/08/26 04:00 AM Are you really that daft?Ronald Maas2014/08/26 03:37 PM Conservative, or just realistic?Daniel B2014/08/27 12:27 AM Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 12:34 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 01:21 PM Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/27 02:38 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:22 PM Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:26 AM Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 02:56 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:14 PM Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:42 AM Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/28 04:11 AM Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/27 03:35 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 11:04 PM Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/28 05:57 AM Some new data to scrap overRicardo B2014/08/29 08:14 AM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Doug S2014/08/16 07:06 PM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Ricardo B2014/08/17 06:01 AM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?juanrga2014/08/17 01:43 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Aaron Spink2014/08/16 08:10 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]dmcq2014/08/17 01:58 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:06 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 09:40 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:37 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 12:12 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/17 12:12 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 12:15 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:45 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 01:13 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]David Kanter2014/08/17 02:29 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 03:10 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 04:08 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Klimax2014/08/17 09:42 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/18 12:21 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/18 03:19 AM Die Size matters a LOT!Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:21 PM I agreeDavid Hess2014/08/17 02:24 PM I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 10:14 PM I agreedmcq2014/08/16 02:53 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 03:55 AM Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/16 04:40 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 10:43 AM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/16 09:07 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:35 PM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/17 03:24 PM Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/18 04:50 AM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/18 02:58 PM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 11:43 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 11:55 AM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 12:04 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 07:19 AM Beyond web serversrwessel2014/08/17 08:34 AM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 09:23 AM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/17 10:04 AM Beyond web serversRicardo B2014/08/17 10:37 AM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 11:31 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 03:59 PM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:42 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/18 01:39 PM Beyond web serversGabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:33 PM Beyond web serversRonald Maas2014/08/17 08:06 AM Amdahl's law (NT)Michael S2014/08/17 10:08 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:41 PM Xeon-class performancePaul A. Clayton2014/08/16 09:31 AM Xeon-class performancejuanrga2014/08/16 10:53 AM Xeon-class performanceKlimax2014/08/17 01:29 PM Design targets aren't datadistantobserver2014/08/16 11:22 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Kevin G2014/08/10 09:26 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:25 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:15 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:03 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:33 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnone2014/08/11 12:35 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnope2014/08/11 01:05 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 03:02 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRicardo B2014/08/11 03:04 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:10 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:44 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/09 11:37 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:07 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 04:13 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/11 11:08 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 08:32 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:11 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:27 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 10:30 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 02:56 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:29 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:30 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:46 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/12 04:48 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/13 08:25 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/13 03:55 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/08 10:36 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:12 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/09 02:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:54 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 08:50 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:35 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:20 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:48 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:10 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:21 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:38 AM ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/09 09:50 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 10:51 AM ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/09 12:36 PM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 09:37 PM ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 01:21 AM ISA doesn't matterdmcq2014/08/10 03:06 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 01:21 PM ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/10 08:03 PM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 10:45 PM ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:57 PM ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/11 03:18 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/16 02:38 PM ISA doesn't matter -- PARMAook2014/08/26 10:50 AM IBM fab business is losing money, the POWER line is notMark Roulo2014/08/11 06:44 AM ISA doesn't matterTREZA2014/08/10 03:27 AM ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 04:34 AM ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 05:01 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:28 PM ISA does matterMichael S2014/08/12 12:20 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 01:38 AM ISA does matterAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:06 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:27 AM ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 02:28 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:43 PM Banning of Juanrgagallier22014/08/13 07:56 AM bad idea (NT)Michael S2014/08/13 08:02 AM ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 06:48 AM Best *Student* Paper Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 11:31 AM ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 03:32 AM ISA doesn't matterWilco2014/08/10 04:48 AM ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/10 10:38 AM ISA doesn't matterUngo2014/08/11 02:59 PM ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/11 06:17 AM ISA doesn't matterGabriele Svelto2014/08/12 10:31 PM ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/13 02:09 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:44 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 09:17 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 11:38 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 12:41 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 12:49 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 01:13 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 01:30 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 02:15 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechcarop2014/08/10 01:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 03:50 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:38 AM Thank you (NT)Michael S2014/08/10 06:16 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Alberto2014/08/11 01:57 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Wilco2014/08/11 02:14 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.David Hess2014/08/11 10:56 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.juanrga2014/08/11 06:32 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:34 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:19 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 02:10 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/10 05:17 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 02:40 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 03:27 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 04:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 04:50 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:04 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 07:30 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:46 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/11 04:37 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 12:58 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:11 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 01:22 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:40 AM Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:29 AM Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedjuanrga2014/08/13 10:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 07:48 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 08:19 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:18 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/10 01:12 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/10 01:43 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRonald Maas2014/08/10 09:56 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechpTmd2014/08/10 11:57 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:02 AM ISA importance and bike sheddingPaul A. Clayton2014/08/11 01:39 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 02:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:56 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 11:14 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:48 PM ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 03:37 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/13 04:18 AM Look at the system level, ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:47 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Mark Roulo2014/08/14 07:30 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 03:29 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 10:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 11:55 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 01:24 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 01:54 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 02:56 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 02:02 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...David Kanter2014/08/16 03:09 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 04:43 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 05:35 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:17 PM OS/2Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:20 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:36 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:24 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 12:41 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:20 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:43 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 10:30 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:28 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 09:25 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/16 11:10 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 11:42 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 02:40 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:43 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:53 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:42 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ronald Maas2014/08/17 08:57 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/17 09:40 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 11:06 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/17 12:56 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/17 01:22 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 02:14 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/17 04:56 PM cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 10:34 AM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 11:31 AM cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 01:54 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 05:40 PM cheap membarsanon2014/08/21 10:17 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 02:16 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 06:33 AM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 07:18 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 04:50 PM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:06 AM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:11 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/24 06:21 PM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/25 10:02 AM cheap membarsdmcq2014/08/30 01:15 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 09:55 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Howard Chu2014/08/28 08:17 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/29 06:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 07:34 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...foobar2014/08/30 08:26 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/31 03:54 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Wilco2014/08/31 11:52 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 08:52 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:31 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:11 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 02:55 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:15 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:23 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 08:26 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:32 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 03:41 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 05:06 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 04:27 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 10:02 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 10:51 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 07:25 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 09:45 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/29 12:14 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 05:43 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/26 10:54 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 01:29 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 07:16 AM Idiom recognition for LL/SC?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/26 12:28 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:22 PM AltiVec was Power6 (NT)Kira2014/08/17 10:33 AM AltiVec was Power6Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:29 AM AltiVec was Power6Kira2014/08/17 11:53 AM Reply to this TopicName:Email:Topic:Body: No TextMichael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 17, 2014 10:08 am wrote: > Amdahl's law How do you spell tangerine? 🍊
