Amdahl's law (NT)By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), August 17, 2014 11:08 amRoom: Moderated DiscussionsAmdahl's law< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >TopicPosted ByDateAn ARM-based Mac article by GasseeYuhong Bao2014/08/03 02:24 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJoe User2014/08/03 04:51 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 10:06 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeMichael S2014/08/04 12:44 AM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/04 08:45 AM DiscountsRob Thorpe2014/08/04 01:57 PM DiscountsAaron Spink2014/08/05 02:34 AM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeAaron Spink2014/08/05 02:32 AM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureanon2014/08/06 02:48 PM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureUngo2014/08/06 05:34 PM Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureDoug S2014/08/06 09:21 PM The return to irrelevance.Alberto2014/08/07 03:04 AM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJacob Marley2014/08/04 04:07 AM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeanon2014/08/03 10:29 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 11:05 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeNiels Jørgen Kruse2014/08/03 11:32 PM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeex-apple2014/08/04 06:20 PM An ARM-based Mac article by GasseePatrick Chase2014/08/04 07:51 PM Mac Intel urban legendsWes Felter2014/08/05 08:19 PM Mac Intel urban legendsUngo2014/08/06 03:09 PM An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseejuanrga2014/08/04 02:05 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 08:01 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/04 03:20 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/04 07:46 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 08:14 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/05 02:11 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 08:40 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 09:51 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 02:11 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 02:15 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 05:42 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/06 06:04 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/08 04:35 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 02:58 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/05 10:27 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Michael S2014/08/08 04:58 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 11:00 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Klimax2014/08/08 01:17 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 04:48 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 06:40 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 11:51 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 05:57 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/09 07:43 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 08:06 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Jukka Larja2014/08/17 04:40 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 09:50 AM Intel binning advantagePaul A. Clayton2014/08/09 10:58 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ronald Maas2014/08/10 07:12 PM Where is the profit?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 09:23 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/11 03:02 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 11:41 PM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 06:01 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 10:10 AM Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/10 10:20 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Mark Roulo2014/08/04 08:43 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Anon2014/08/04 01:17 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Kevin G2014/08/05 11:11 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Ricardo B2014/08/05 02:30 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Maxwell2014/08/04 07:55 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?gallier22014/08/05 01:28 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 08:48 AM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 04:59 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 04:56 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?rwessel2014/08/05 05:40 PM Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/06 11:59 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/06 03:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/06 05:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/06 11:55 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 07:54 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 07:57 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechPatrick Chase2014/08/07 09:39 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 10:49 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/08 11:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 12:09 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/08 01:12 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 04:36 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 01:31 AM Actually, he did.iz2014/08/09 02:05 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 02:36 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 02:51 AM Actually, he did.juanrga2014/08/09 05:26 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 11:01 AM Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/10 12:29 PM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 02:04 PM Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/11 02:52 AM Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/11 11:08 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/08 02:26 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 11:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 02:10 PM x87 taxMichael S2014/08/09 02:37 PM x87 taxKlimax2014/08/10 08:48 AM Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/11 04:07 PM Visual C and x87rwessel2014/08/11 06:32 PM Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/12 09:29 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/11 04:21 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 12:29 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/09 04:22 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 05:03 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/09 09:55 AM Complexity = f (area, X, Y) not f(area)Paul A. Clayton2014/08/09 01:47 PM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 04:27 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.dmcq2014/08/10 05:09 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 05:53 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/10 06:24 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/10 07:24 AM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/11 07:05 PM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/11 08:28 PM Stop trollingDavid Kanter2014/08/10 09:12 PM Stop trollingExophase2014/08/10 09:34 PM Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsjuanrga2014/08/11 06:38 PM Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsKlimax2014/08/11 10:03 PM Is comparing to highest bin fair?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/11 01:37 AM Is comparing to highest bin fair?David Kanter2014/08/13 12:18 PM What kind of comparison was intended?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/13 04:18 PM Stop ignoring datajuanrga2014/08/11 07:00 PM Stop ignoring dataKlimax2014/08/11 10:06 PM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:21 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:24 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 03:00 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 03:08 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 03:25 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 06:29 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 11:19 AM Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 02:08 PM Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called JuanrgaJ Random Hacker2014/08/19 05:47 PM Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called Juanrgaanon2014/08/20 03:46 PM Design targets aren't dataDavid Kanter2014/08/13 01:07 PM I agreejuanrga2014/08/13 03:16 PM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/14 11:37 PM Not again, thanksjuanrga2014/08/15 03:22 AM I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 07:40 AM I agreeMichael S2014/08/15 07:55 AM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 09:43 AM I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 11:28 AM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 09:41 AM I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 11:39 AM I agreeKlimax2014/08/15 01:57 PM I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 03:01 PM on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/15 04:41 PM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 03:15 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 03:56 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 04:39 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 07:52 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 11:21 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 08:51 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/16 09:45 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 10:14 AM on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 10:54 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 11:32 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceSymmetry2014/08/17 06:32 AM on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/17 07:07 AM K12Alexko2014/08/15 05:43 PM K12David Kanter2014/08/15 06:54 PM K12Alexko2014/08/16 03:14 AM K12juanrga2014/08/16 04:34 AM Sorry cannot share any detailsDavid Kanter2014/08/16 11:31 AM K12, some guesses/leaksjuanrga2014/08/18 02:48 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 02:56 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Kira2014/08/16 09:07 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/16 09:56 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Doug S2014/08/16 10:28 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 12:01 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/16 01:56 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 02:29 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 03:08 PM Metal pitchesDavid Kanter2014/08/17 03:20 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 04:14 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 11:49 AM Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 11:27 AM Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/16 12:45 PM Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 02:16 PM Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/17 02:52 PM History is very usefulDavid Kanter2014/08/17 03:18 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsjuanrga2014/08/17 04:33 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsDavid Kanter2014/08/17 06:28 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsPurana Archer2014/08/18 03:32 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/18 08:17 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsMaynard Handley2014/08/18 01:36 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/19 01:53 AM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionstarlinian2014/08/19 01:14 PM History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsAaron Spink2014/08/17 10:10 PM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 01:36 AM Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/19 03:00 AM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 04:33 AM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 08:17 AM Intel has process advantage.Michael S2014/08/20 08:58 AM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 05:11 PM Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 11:49 PM Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/21 01:51 AM Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/21 03:05 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/21 02:15 AM Could you please stopDaniel B2014/08/21 04:41 AM Could you please stopanon2014/08/21 09:20 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 12:29 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 02:14 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 03:11 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 10:12 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 02:16 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 03:38 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:52 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 03:55 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 04:07 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 04:40 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingAaron Spink2014/08/26 04:50 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingDavid Kanter2014/08/26 06:25 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 04:10 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 04:15 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingMaynard Handley2014/08/26 02:49 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 04:44 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 10:37 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingDoug S2014/08/25 10:24 PM Intel process advantage is shrinkingdmcq2014/08/26 12:17 AM Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 02:22 AM Are you really that daft?Daniel B2014/08/26 05:00 AM Are you really that daft?Ronald Maas2014/08/26 04:37 PM Conservative, or just realistic?Daniel B2014/08/27 01:27 AM Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 01:34 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 02:21 PM Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/27 03:38 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 11:22 PM Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 02:26 AM Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 03:56 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 11:14 PM Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 02:42 AM Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/28 05:11 AM Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/27 04:35 PM Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/28 12:04 AM Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/28 06:57 AM Some new data to scrap overRicardo B2014/08/29 09:14 AM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Doug S2014/08/16 08:06 PM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Ricardo B2014/08/17 07:01 AM Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?juanrga2014/08/17 02:43 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Aaron Spink2014/08/16 09:10 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]dmcq2014/08/17 02:58 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 10:06 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 10:40 AM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:37 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 01:12 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/17 01:12 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 01:15 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 01:45 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 02:13 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]David Kanter2014/08/17 03:29 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 04:10 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 05:08 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Klimax2014/08/17 10:42 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/18 01:21 PM "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/18 04:19 AM Die Size matters a LOT!Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 01:21 PM I agreeDavid Hess2014/08/17 03:24 PM I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 11:14 PM I agreedmcq2014/08/16 03:53 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 04:55 AM Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/16 05:40 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 11:43 AM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/16 10:07 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 02:35 PM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/17 04:24 PM Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/18 05:50 AM Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/18 03:58 PM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 12:43 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 12:55 PM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 01:04 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 08:19 AM Beyond web serversrwessel2014/08/17 09:34 AM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 10:23 AM Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/17 11:04 AM Beyond web serversRicardo B2014/08/17 11:37 AM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 12:31 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 04:59 PM Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 06:42 PM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/18 02:39 PM Beyond web serversGabriele Svelto2014/08/16 11:33 PM Beyond web serversRonald Maas2014/08/17 09:06 AM Amdahl's law (NT)Michael S2014/08/17 11:08 AM Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 02:41 PM Xeon-class performancePaul A. Clayton2014/08/16 10:31 AM Xeon-class performancejuanrga2014/08/16 11:53 AM Xeon-class performanceKlimax2014/08/17 02:29 PM Design targets aren't datadistantobserver2014/08/16 12:22 PM x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Kevin G2014/08/10 10:26 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 05:25 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/10 09:15 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 10:03 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:33 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnone2014/08/11 01:35 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnope2014/08/11 02:05 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 04:02 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRicardo B2014/08/11 04:04 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 08:10 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 08:44 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/10 12:37 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 06:07 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:13 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/11 12:08 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 09:32 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 03:11 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 05:27 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 11:30 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:56 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 05:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 06:29 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 08:30 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 08:46 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/12 05:48 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/13 09:25 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/13 04:55 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/08 11:36 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 12:12 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/09 03:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 03:54 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 09:50 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 10:35 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 04:20 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:48 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 04:10 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 05:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 06:21 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 06:38 AM ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/09 10:50 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 11:51 AM ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/09 01:36 PM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 10:37 PM ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 02:21 AM ISA doesn't matterdmcq2014/08/10 04:06 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 02:21 PM ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/10 09:03 PM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 11:45 PM ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:57 AM ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/11 04:18 AM ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/16 03:38 PM ISA doesn't matter -- PARMAook2014/08/26 11:50 AM IBM fab business is losing money, the POWER line is notMark Roulo2014/08/11 07:44 AM ISA doesn't matterTREZA2014/08/10 04:27 AM ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 05:34 AM ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 06:01 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 07:28 PM ISA does matterMichael S2014/08/12 01:20 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:38 AM ISA does matterAaron Spink2014/08/12 03:06 AM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 03:27 AM ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 03:28 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 03:43 PM Banning of Juanrgagallier22014/08/13 08:56 AM bad idea (NT)Michael S2014/08/13 09:02 AM ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:48 AM Best *Student* Paper Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 12:31 PM ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 04:32 AM ISA doesn't matterWilco2014/08/10 05:48 AM ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/10 11:38 AM ISA doesn't matterUngo2014/08/11 03:59 PM ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/11 07:17 AM ISA doesn't matterGabriele Svelto2014/08/12 11:31 PM ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/13 03:09 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 03:44 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 06:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 10:17 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 12:38 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 01:41 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 01:49 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 02:13 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 02:30 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 03:15 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechcarop2014/08/10 02:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 04:50 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 06:23 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 06:38 AM Thank you (NT)Michael S2014/08/10 07:16 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Alberto2014/08/11 02:57 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Wilco2014/08/11 03:14 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.David Hess2014/08/11 11:56 AM Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.juanrga2014/08/11 07:32 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 07:34 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 06:19 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 03:10 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 03:01 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/10 06:17 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 03:40 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 04:27 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:50 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 06:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 08:04 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 08:30 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 08:46 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/11 05:37 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 01:58 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:11 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 02:22 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:40 AM Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedDavid Kanter2014/08/13 11:29 AM Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedjuanrga2014/08/13 11:51 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 08:48 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 09:19 AM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 06:00 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 06:18 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/10 02:12 PM A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/10 02:43 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRonald Maas2014/08/10 10:56 PM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechpTmd2014/08/11 12:57 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 01:02 AM ISA importance and bike sheddingPaul A. Clayton2014/08/11 02:39 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 03:43 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 05:56 AM A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 12:14 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 07:48 PM ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 04:37 PM ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/13 05:18 AM Look at the system level, ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/13 11:47 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Mark Roulo2014/08/14 08:30 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 04:29 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 09:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 11:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 12:55 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 02:24 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 02:54 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 03:56 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 03:02 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...David Kanter2014/08/16 04:09 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 05:43 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 06:35 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 07:17 PM OS/2Ricardo B2014/08/16 07:20 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 09:36 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:24 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 01:41 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 02:20 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 09:43 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 11:30 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 06:28 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 10:25 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 12:10 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/17 12:42 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 03:40 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 06:43 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 07:53 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 07:42 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ronald Maas2014/08/17 09:57 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/17 10:40 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 12:06 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/17 01:56 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/17 02:22 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 03:14 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/17 05:56 PM cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 11:34 AM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 12:31 PM cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 02:54 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 06:40 PM cheap membarsanon2014/08/21 11:17 PM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 03:16 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 07:33 AM cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 08:18 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 05:50 PM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 11:06 AM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 11:11 AM cheap membarsanon2014/08/24 07:21 PM cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/25 11:02 AM cheap membarsdmcq2014/08/30 02:15 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 10:55 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Howard Chu2014/08/28 09:17 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/29 07:35 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 08:34 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 03:49 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...foobar2014/08/30 09:26 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/31 04:54 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Wilco2014/08/31 12:52 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:52 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 10:31 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 02:11 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 03:55 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 11:15 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 11:23 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 09:26 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 11:32 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 04:41 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 06:06 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 05:27 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 11:02 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 11:51 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 08:25 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 10:45 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/29 01:14 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 03:49 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 06:43 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/26 11:54 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 02:29 AM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 08:16 AM Idiom recognition for LL/SC?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/26 01:28 PM POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/16 11:22 PM AltiVec was Power6 (NT)Kira2014/08/17 11:33 AM AltiVec was Power6Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:29 PM AltiVec was Power6Kira2014/08/17 12:53 PM Reply to this TopicName:Email:Topic:Body: No TextMichael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 17, 2014 11:08 am wrote: > Amdahl's law How do you spell avocado?
