"Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]

By: tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com), August 17, 2014 2:08 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 17, 2014 2:29 pm wrote:
> tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 16, 2014 1:56 pm wrote:
> > juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 16, 2014 12:01 pm wrote:
> > > Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on August 16, 2014 10:28 am wrote:
> > > > Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on August 16, 2014 9:56 am wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't trust anything in that www.electronicsweekly.com story. (It lost all credibility
> > > > > when it went off on some strange tangent about providing Apple with an A57 variant.) BUT
> > > > > I think you're being too optimistic about Intel's 14nm. Let's read the
> > > > > Intel press release closely (ie like a lawyer). Here's what they say:
> > > > > "
> > > > > • The first systems based on the Intel® Core™ M processor will be on shelves for the
> > > > > holiday selling season followed by broader OEM availability in the first half of 2015.
> > > > > • Additional products based on the Broadwell microarchitecture and
> > > > > 14nm process technology will be introduced in the coming months.
> > > > > "
> > > > >
> > > > > So what will be available 1H15 is more Broadwell-Y parts --- ie the parts that may
> > > > > be of interest to Surface Pro 4 and similar devices, but are probably not of interest
> > > > > to even MacBook Air level devices, let alone larger laptops and desktops.
> > > > > REAL Broadwell devices get the very specific due date of "coming months" which doesn't
> > > > > indicate much confidence on the part of Intel as to when they might ship.
> > > > >
> > > > > Charlie at SemiAccurate has stated that dual-core parts will arrive in six months, and quad-core in eleven
> > > > > months. You can have whatever opinion you like about his accuracy, but everything Intel has said, HOW
> > > > > they have said it, and what they have NOT said, fits with such an (extremely delayed) schedule.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While I don't disagree with any of that, foundries can call whatever they like "14nm" or "16nm" or "10nm".
> > > > There is no UK advertising standards group that will fine
> > > > them if they're stretching the truth. The process
> > > > name being the same or similar doesn't mean they're necessarily comparable to Intel's 14nm.
> > > >
> > > > The whole idea of saying "because Intel promises 14nm on date x" and "these foundries have promised
> > > > 16nm, 14nm and 10nm on these dates" tells you anything about who is ahead is ludicrous. Intel's
> > > > 14nm has been delayed, and may be further delayed for higher power Broadwell parts - but maybe it
> > > > was always planned to be skipped entirely. Maybe the rumor from a year or two ago that Intel would
> > > > not sell socketed Broadwell parts was true, but not for the reasons that concerned people.
> > > >
> > > > The one thing I saw that suggested foundries weren't so far behind Intel after all was
> > > > the density of Apple's A7 on Samsung's 28nm process, which was a lot closer to Intel's
> > > > 22nm density than their 28nm density (though granted comparing a mobile ARM SoC versus
> > > > a mobile x86 SoC based on transistors and die size is far from foolproof)
> > > >
> > > > But that doesn't mean that what Samsung calls "14nm" will be 4x as dense as what they call "28nm".
> > > > Based on what I've read that does at least appear to be true for Intel. And power and performance
> > > > are a whole other matter, as improving those will typically require sacrifices in density.
> > >
> > > Well what Intel decided to call 22nm is what rest of industry calls ~26nm. However, rest of industries
> > > have decided to redefine the nanometer and play with Intel to the same silly marketing game.
> > >
> > > But as you say the node name is irrelevant, what is relevant are its parameters. According
> > > to the ITRS, the key metric of progress is the M1 HP. Intel 14nm node has a M1 HP of 26nm.
> > > TSMC 16nm has a M1 HP of 32nm. Thus Intel 14nm has an advantage of about 23% over TSMC 16nm.
> > > That is about half node, which implies that Intel traditional lead has been reduced. It
> > > is expected that the lead will vanish at the 10nm node, somewhere in 2016--2017.
> >
> > Come on, I've been reading your posts and giving you the benefit of the doubt on microarchitecture,
> > but are you really going to play the silly node naming game as well? No one expects nodes to
> > be comparable across competitors. (But I will note that Intel didn't decide to arbitrarily call
> > 32/22 nm 28/20 nm. They freely admit that the same generation foundry processes have better
> > density. Each node has scaled quite well from the previous one. 14/16 nm will have no effective
> > shrink outside of what you can wring from having better performing devices.)
> >
>
> Even former Intel people agrees on that Intel relabeled nodes and reinvented the nanometer for marketing
> purposes. Hans (Chip architect) has explained this silly marketing game much better than I could do:
>
>
No, What TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF said is:
>
> We call these processes 14nm / 16nm because:
> Intel deviated from the official ITRS process naming rules and Intel
> marketing/shareholders always abuse this against us to claim they
> are many, many years ahead.
>

> Indeed, based on BEOL density Intel's processes should have been called
> differently according to the official ITRS naming standards:
>
> Intel's 65nm should have been called 80nm instead.
> Intel's 45nm should have been called 55nm instead.
> Intel's 32nm should have been called 39nm instead.
>
> You can see this in the graph below:
>
> -The blue squares show the official metal 1 half pitches according to the ITRS.
> -The purple circles and squares are the actual BEOL metal 1 half pitches of Intel's processes.
>
> You can see that going from 90nm to 65nm Intel improved the BEOL MT1
> by only 5%. They did exactly the same then as TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF
> are doing now.
>
> It is due to the ignorance of the general public, which has no knowledge
> of the official process naming rules, that TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF are
> forced to deviate from the official naming rules in the same way as Intel
> did.

>
> > You're also ignoring the fact that no one has even announced ship dates for any 14/16 nm products. Until
> > now we've seen maybe 1 HVM 20 nm parts, the Qualcomm modem. No one other than Intel has started HVM of any
> > 14/16 nm parts. Forget even just one low power part like
> > Intel. TSMC claims risk production of 16 nm started
> > in late 2013. We aren't going to see any 16 nm parts in products until 2H 2015 at the earliest. That's a
> > 2 year delta. And you think that 10 nm is just going to show up the next year. The foundries might have
> > decided what their 10 nm process is going to look like by then, forget actually making anything.
>
> Broadwell-EP is expected for Q4 2015. Several ARM servers are expected for 2016, including AMD K12.
> Nobody will be announcing ship dates this early, but the products are expected for that time.

If you continue to believe that M1 half-pitch is all that matters when comparing process technologies, I don't suppose there's any point in discussing this with you. That might have been true 20 years ago when everyone's transistors were identical, wire delay was meaningless, leakage didn't matter and no one even bothered considering design rules, but it certainly isn't true now.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeYuhong Bao2014/08/03 01:24 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJoe User2014/08/03 03:51 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 09:06 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeMichael S2014/08/03 11:44 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/04 07:45 AM
        DiscountsRob Thorpe2014/08/04 12:57 PM
          DiscountsAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:34 AM
        An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:32 AM
          Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureanon2014/08/06 01:48 PM
            Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureUngo2014/08/06 04:34 PM
            Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureDoug S2014/08/06 08:21 PM
            The return to irrelevance.Alberto2014/08/07 02:04 AM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJacob Marley2014/08/04 03:07 AM
  An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeanon2014/08/03 09:29 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 10:05 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeNiels Jørgen Kruse2014/08/03 10:32 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeex-apple2014/08/04 05:20 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseePatrick Chase2014/08/04 06:51 PM
        Mac Intel urban legendsWes Felter2014/08/05 07:19 PM
          Mac Intel urban legendsUngo2014/08/06 02:09 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseejuanrga2014/08/04 01:05 AM
    Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:01 AM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/04 02:20 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/04 06:46 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:14 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/05 01:11 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:40 AM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 08:51 AM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:11 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:15 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 04:42 PM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/06 05:04 PM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/08 03:35 AM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 01:58 PM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/05 09:27 AM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Michael S2014/08/08 03:58 AM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 10:00 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Klimax2014/08/08 12:17 PM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 03:48 PM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 05:40 PM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:51 PM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 04:57 AM
                    Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/09 06:43 AM
                      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 07:06 AM
                      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Jukka Larja2014/08/17 03:40 AM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 08:50 AM
                  Intel binning advantagePaul A. Clayton2014/08/09 09:58 AM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ronald Maas2014/08/10 06:12 PM
                    Where is the profit?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 08:23 PM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/11 02:02 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:41 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 05:01 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 09:10 AM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/10 09:20 AM
  Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Mark Roulo2014/08/04 07:43 AM
    Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Anon2014/08/04 12:17 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Kevin G2014/08/05 10:11 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Ricardo B2014/08/05 01:30 PM
    Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Maxwell2014/08/04 06:55 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?gallier22014/08/05 12:28 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:48 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:59 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:56 PM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?rwessel2014/08/05 04:40 PM
          Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/06 10:59 AM
  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/06 02:51 AM
    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/06 04:01 AM
    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/06 10:55 AM
      A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:54 PM
        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:57 PM
        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechPatrick Chase2014/08/07 08:39 AM
        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 09:49 AM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/08 10:23 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 11:09 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/08 12:12 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 03:36 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 12:31 AM
                    Actually, he did.iz2014/08/09 01:05 AM
                      Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:36 AM
                        Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:51 AM
                          Actually, he did.juanrga2014/08/09 04:26 AM
                            Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 10:01 AM
                              Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/10 11:29 AM
                                Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 01:04 PM
                                  Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/11 01:52 AM
                                    Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/11 10:08 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/08 01:26 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 10:01 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 01:10 PM
                    x87 taxMichael S2014/08/09 01:37 PM
                      x87 taxKlimax2014/08/10 07:48 AM
                        Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/11 03:07 PM
                          Visual C and x87rwessel2014/08/11 05:32 PM
                            Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/12 08:29 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/11 03:21 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:29 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/09 03:22 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 04:03 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/09 08:55 AM
                    Complexity = f (area, X, Y) not f(area)Paul A. Clayton2014/08/09 12:47 PM
                    x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.dmcq2014/08/10 04:09 AM
                        x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 04:53 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/10 05:24 AM
                        x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/10 06:24 AM
                          x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/11 06:05 PM
                            x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/11 07:28 PM
                        Stop trollingDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:12 PM
                          Stop trollingExophase2014/08/10 08:34 PM
                            Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsjuanrga2014/08/11 05:38 PM
                              Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsKlimax2014/08/11 09:03 PM
                          Is comparing to highest bin fair?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/11 12:37 AM
                            Is comparing to highest bin fair?David Kanter2014/08/13 11:18 AM
                              What kind of comparison was intended?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/13 03:18 PM
                          Stop ignoring datajuanrga2014/08/11 06:00 PM
                            Stop ignoring dataKlimax2014/08/11 09:06 PM
                              Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 01:21 AM
                                Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:24 AM
                                  Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:00 AM
                                    Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:08 AM
                                      Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:25 AM
                                Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 05:29 AM
                                  Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 10:19 AM
                                    Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 01:08 PM
                                Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called JuanrgaJ Random Hacker2014/08/19 04:47 PM
                                  Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called Juanrgaanon2014/08/20 02:46 PM
                            Design targets aren't dataDavid Kanter2014/08/13 12:07 PM
                              I agreejuanrga2014/08/13 02:16 PM
                                I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/14 10:37 PM
                                  Not again, thanksjuanrga2014/08/15 02:22 AM
                                  I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 06:40 AM
                                    I agreeMichael S2014/08/15 06:55 AM
                                      I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:43 AM
                                      I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:28 AM
                                    I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:41 AM
                                      I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:39 AM
                                        I agreeKlimax2014/08/15 12:57 PM
                                        I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 02:01 PM
                                          on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/15 03:41 PM
                                            on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 02:15 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 02:56 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 03:39 AM
                                                  on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 06:52 AM
                                                    on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 10:21 AM
                                            on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 07:51 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/16 08:45 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 09:14 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 09:54 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 10:32 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceSymmetry2014/08/17 05:32 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/17 06:07 AM
                                          K12Alexko2014/08/15 04:43 PM
                                            K12David Kanter2014/08/15 05:54 PM
                                              K12Alexko2014/08/16 02:14 AM
                                              K12juanrga2014/08/16 03:34 AM
                                                Sorry cannot share any detailsDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:31 AM
                                                  K12, some guesses/leaksjuanrga2014/08/18 01:48 PM
                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 01:56 AM
                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Kira2014/08/16 08:07 AM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:56 AM
                                                "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Doug S2014/08/16 09:28 AM
                                                  "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 11:01 AM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/16 12:56 PM
                                                      "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 01:29 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 02:08 PM
                                                          Metal pitchesDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:20 PM
                                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 03:14 PM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 10:49 AM
                                            Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:27 AM
                                              Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/16 11:45 AM
                                                Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 01:16 PM
                                                  Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/17 01:52 PM
                                                    History is very usefulDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:18 PM
                                                      History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsjuanrga2014/08/17 03:33 PM
                                                        History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:28 PM
                                                          History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsPurana Archer2014/08/18 02:32 AM
                                                            History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/18 07:17 AM
                                                              History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsMaynard Handley2014/08/18 12:36 PM
                                                                History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/19 12:53 AM
                                                                History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionstarlinian2014/08/19 12:14 PM
                                                        History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsAaron Spink2014/08/17 09:10 PM
                                                        Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:36 AM
                                                          Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/19 02:00 AM
                                                            Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 03:33 AM
                                                              Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 07:17 AM
                                                                Intel has process advantage.Michael S2014/08/20 07:58 AM
                                                                  Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 04:11 PM
                                                                Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 10:49 PM
                                                                  Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/21 12:51 AM
                                                                    Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/21 02:05 AM
                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/21 01:15 AM
                                                                    Could you please stopDaniel B2014/08/21 03:41 AM
                                                                      Could you please stopanon2014/08/21 08:20 AM
                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 11:29 AM
                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 01:14 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 02:11 PM
                                                                          Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 09:12 PM
                                                                            Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:16 AM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:38 AM
                                                                                Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 02:52 AM
                                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:55 AM
                                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 03:07 AM
                                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:40 AM
                                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingAaron Spink2014/08/26 03:50 AM
                                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingDavid Kanter2014/08/26 05:25 PM
                                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:10 AM
                                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:15 AM
                                                                            Intel process advantage is shrinkingMaynard Handley2014/08/26 01:49 PM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:44 PM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 09:37 PM
                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingDoug S2014/08/25 09:24 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingdmcq2014/08/25 11:17 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:22 AM
                                                                      Are you really that daft?Daniel B2014/08/26 04:00 AM
                                                                        Are you really that daft?Ronald Maas2014/08/26 03:37 PM
                                                                          Conservative, or just realistic?Daniel B2014/08/27 12:27 AM
                                                                      Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 12:34 PM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 01:21 PM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/27 02:38 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:22 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:26 AM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 02:56 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:14 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:42 AM
                                                                              Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/28 04:11 AM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/27 03:35 PM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 11:04 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/28 05:57 AM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overRicardo B2014/08/29 08:14 AM
                                                Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Doug S2014/08/16 07:06 PM
                                                  Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Ricardo B2014/08/17 06:01 AM
                                                  Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?juanrga2014/08/17 01:43 PM
                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Aaron Spink2014/08/16 08:10 PM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]dmcq2014/08/17 01:58 AM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:06 AM
                                                "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 09:40 AM
                                                  "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:37 AM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 12:12 PM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/17 12:12 PM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 12:15 PM
                                                      "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:45 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 01:13 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]David Kanter2014/08/17 02:29 PM
                                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 03:10 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 04:08 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Klimax2014/08/17 09:42 PM
                                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/18 12:21 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/18 03:19 AM
                                                            Die Size matters a LOT!Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:21 PM
                                        I agreeDavid Hess2014/08/17 02:24 PM
                                      I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 10:14 PM
                                        I agreedmcq2014/08/16 02:53 AM
                                          Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 03:55 AM
                                            Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/16 04:40 AM
                                              Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 10:43 AM
                                                Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/16 09:07 PM
                                                  Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:35 PM
                                                    Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/17 03:24 PM
                                                      Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/18 04:50 AM
                                                        Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/18 02:58 PM
                                            Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 11:43 AM
                                              Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 11:55 AM
                                                Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 12:04 PM
                                                  Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 07:19 AM
                                                    Beyond web serversrwessel2014/08/17 08:34 AM
                                                    Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 09:23 AM
                                                      Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/17 10:04 AM
                                                        Beyond web serversRicardo B2014/08/17 10:37 AM
                                                          Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 11:31 AM
                                                      Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 03:59 PM
                                                        Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:42 PM
                                                          Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/18 01:39 PM
                                              Beyond web serversGabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:33 PM
                                                Beyond web serversRonald Maas2014/08/17 08:06 AM
                                                  Amdahl's law (NT)Michael S2014/08/17 10:08 AM
                                                Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:41 PM
                                      Xeon-class performancePaul A. Clayton2014/08/16 09:31 AM
                                        Xeon-class performancejuanrga2014/08/16 10:53 AM
                                          Xeon-class performanceKlimax2014/08/17 01:29 PM
                              Design targets aren't datadistantobserver2014/08/16 11:22 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Kevin G2014/08/10 09:26 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:25 PM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:15 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:03 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:33 PM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnone2014/08/11 12:35 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnope2014/08/11 01:05 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 03:02 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRicardo B2014/08/11 03:04 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:10 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:44 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/09 11:37 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:07 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 04:13 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/11 11:08 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 08:32 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:11 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:27 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 10:30 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 02:56 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:23 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:29 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:30 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:46 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/12 04:48 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/13 08:25 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/13 03:55 PM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/08 10:36 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:12 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/09 02:00 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:54 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 08:50 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:35 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:20 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:48 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:10 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:43 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:21 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:38 AM
              ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/09 09:50 AM
                ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 10:51 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/09 12:36 PM
                    ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 09:37 PM
                      ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 01:21 AM
                        ISA doesn't matterdmcq2014/08/10 03:06 AM
                        ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 01:21 PM
                          ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/10 08:03 PM
                            ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 10:45 PM
                              ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:57 PM
                              ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/11 03:18 AM
                                ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/16 02:38 PM
                              ISA doesn't matter -- PARMAook2014/08/26 10:50 AM
                          IBM fab business is losing money, the POWER line is notMark Roulo2014/08/11 06:44 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterTREZA2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 04:34 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 05:01 AM
                        ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:28 PM
                          ISA does matterMichael S2014/08/12 12:20 AM
                            ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 01:38 AM
                              ISA does matterAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:06 AM
                                ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:27 AM
                                  ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 02:28 PM
                                    ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:43 PM
                                      Banning of Juanrgagallier22014/08/13 07:56 AM
                                        bad idea (NT)Michael S2014/08/13 08:02 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 06:48 AM
                      Best *Student* Paper Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 11:31 AM
                ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 03:32 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterWilco2014/08/10 04:48 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/10 10:38 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterUngo2014/08/11 02:59 PM
                ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/11 06:17 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterGabriele Svelto2014/08/12 10:31 PM
                    ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/13 02:09 AM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:44 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:43 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 09:17 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 11:38 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 12:41 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 12:49 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 01:13 PM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 01:30 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 02:15 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechcarop2014/08/10 01:01 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 03:50 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:23 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:38 AM
                                Thank you (NT)Michael S2014/08/10 06:16 AM
                                Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Alberto2014/08/11 01:57 AM
                                  Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Wilco2014/08/11 02:14 AM
                                  Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.David Hess2014/08/11 10:56 AM
                                    Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.juanrga2014/08/11 06:32 PM
                              ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:34 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:19 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 02:10 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:01 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/10 05:17 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 02:40 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 04:00 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 04:50 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:51 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:04 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 07:30 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:46 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/11 04:37 PM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 12:58 AM
                                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:11 AM
                                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 01:22 AM
                                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:40 AM
                                Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:29 AM
                                  Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedjuanrga2014/08/13 10:51 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 07:48 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 08:19 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:00 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:18 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/10 01:12 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/10 01:43 PM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRonald Maas2014/08/10 09:56 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechpTmd2014/08/10 11:57 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:02 AM
              ISA importance and bike sheddingPaul A. Clayton2014/08/11 01:39 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 02:43 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:56 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 11:14 AM
            ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:48 PM
              ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 03:37 PM
                ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/13 04:18 AM
            Look at the system level, ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:47 AM
              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Mark Roulo2014/08/14 07:30 AM
                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 03:29 AM
                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:35 AM
                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 10:35 AM
                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 11:55 AM
                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 01:24 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 01:54 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 02:56 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 02:02 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...David Kanter2014/08/16 03:09 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 04:43 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 05:35 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:17 PM
                              OS/2Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:20 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:36 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:24 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 12:41 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:20 AM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:43 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 10:30 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:28 AM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 09:25 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/16 11:10 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 11:42 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 02:40 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:43 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:53 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:42 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ronald Maas2014/08/17 08:57 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/17 09:40 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 11:06 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/17 12:56 PM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/17 01:22 PM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 02:14 PM
                                      cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/17 04:56 PM
                                        cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 10:34 AM
                                          cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 11:31 AM
                                            cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 01:54 PM
                                              cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 05:40 PM
                                            cheap membarsanon2014/08/21 10:17 PM
                                              cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 02:16 AM
                                                cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 06:33 AM
                                                  cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 07:18 AM
                                                    cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 04:50 PM
                                                      cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:06 AM
                                                        cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:11 AM
                                                          cheap membarsanon2014/08/24 06:21 PM
                                                            cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/25 10:02 AM
                                                              cheap membarsdmcq2014/08/30 01:15 AM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 09:55 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Howard Chu2014/08/28 08:17 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/29 06:35 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 07:34 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 PM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...foobar2014/08/30 08:26 PM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/31 03:54 AM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Wilco2014/08/31 11:52 AM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 08:52 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:31 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:11 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 02:55 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:15 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:23 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 08:26 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:32 PM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 03:41 AM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 05:06 AM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 04:27 PM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 10:02 PM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 10:51 PM
                                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 07:25 PM
                                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 09:45 PM
                                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/29 12:14 AM
                                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 AM
                                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 05:43 AM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/26 10:54 PM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 01:29 AM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 07:16 AM
                                    Idiom recognition for LL/SC?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/26 12:28 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:22 PM
                      AltiVec was Power6 (NT)Kira2014/08/17 10:33 AM
                        AltiVec was Power6Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:29 AM
                          AltiVec was Power6Kira2014/08/17 11:53 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?