"Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]

By: juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com), August 17, 2014 3:14 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 17, 2014 3:08 pm wrote:
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 17, 2014 2:29 pm wrote:
> > tarlinian (tarlinian.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 16, 2014 1:56 pm wrote:
> > > juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 16, 2014 12:01 pm wrote:
> > > > Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on August 16, 2014 10:28 am wrote:
> > > > > Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on August 16, 2014 9:56 am wrote:
> > > > > > I wouldn't trust anything in that www.electronicsweekly.com story. (It lost all credibility
> > > > > > when it went off on some strange tangent about providing Apple with an A57 variant.) BUT
> > > > > > I think you're being too optimistic about Intel's 14nm. Let's read the
> > > > > > Intel press release closely (ie like a lawyer). Here's what they say:
> > > > > > "
> > > > > > • The first systems based on the Intel® Core™ M processor will be on shelves for the
> > > > > > holiday selling season followed by broader OEM availability in the first half of 2015.
> > > > > > • Additional products based on the Broadwell microarchitecture and
> > > > > > 14nm process technology will be introduced in the coming months.
> > > > > > "
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So what will be available 1H15 is more Broadwell-Y parts --- ie the parts that may
> > > > > > be of interest to Surface Pro 4 and similar devices, but are probably not of interest
> > > > > > to even MacBook Air level devices, let alone larger laptops and desktops.
> > > > > > REAL Broadwell devices get the very specific due date of "coming months" which doesn't
> > > > > > indicate much confidence on the part of Intel as to when they might ship.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Charlie at SemiAccurate has stated that dual-core parts will arrive in six months, and quad-core in eleven
> > > > > > months. You can have whatever opinion you like about his accuracy, but everything Intel has said, HOW
> > > > > > they have said it, and what they have NOT said, fits with such an (extremely delayed) schedule.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > While I don't disagree with any of that, foundries can call whatever they like "14nm" or "16nm" or "10nm".
> > > > > There is no UK advertising standards group that will fine
> > > > > them if they're stretching the truth. The process
> > > > > name being the same or similar doesn't mean they're necessarily comparable to Intel's 14nm.
> > > > >
> > > > > The whole idea of saying "because Intel promises 14nm on date x" and "these foundries have promised
> > > > > 16nm, 14nm and 10nm on these dates" tells you anything about who is ahead is ludicrous. Intel's
> > > > > 14nm has been delayed, and may be further delayed for higher power Broadwell parts - but maybe it
> > > > > was always planned to be skipped entirely. Maybe the rumor from a year or two ago that Intel would
> > > > > not sell socketed Broadwell parts was true, but not for the reasons that concerned people.
> > > > >
> > > > > The one thing I saw that suggested foundries weren't so far behind Intel after all was
> > > > > the density of Apple's A7 on Samsung's 28nm process, which was a lot closer to Intel's
> > > > > 22nm density than their 28nm density (though granted comparing a mobile ARM SoC versus
> > > > > a mobile x86 SoC based on transistors and die size is far from foolproof)
> > > > >
> > > > > But that doesn't mean that what Samsung calls "14nm" will be 4x as dense as what they call "28nm".
> > > > > Based on what I've read that does at least appear to be true for Intel. And power and performance
> > > > > are a whole other matter, as improving those will typically require sacrifices in density.
> > > >
> > > > Well what Intel decided to call 22nm is what rest of industry calls ~26nm. However, rest of industries
> > > > have decided to redefine the nanometer and play with Intel to the same silly marketing game.
> > > >
> > > > But as you say the node name is irrelevant, what is relevant are its parameters. According
> > > > to the ITRS, the key metric of progress is the M1 HP. Intel 14nm node has a M1 HP of 26nm.
> > > > TSMC 16nm has a M1 HP of 32nm. Thus Intel 14nm has an advantage of about 23% over TSMC 16nm.
> > > > That is about half node, which implies that Intel traditional lead has been reduced. It
> > > > is expected that the lead will vanish at the 10nm node, somewhere in 2016--2017.
> > >
> > > Come on, I've been reading your posts and giving you the benefit of the doubt on microarchitecture,
> > > but are you really going to play the silly node naming game as well? No one expects nodes to
> > > be comparable across competitors. (But I will note that Intel didn't decide to arbitrarily call
> > > 32/22 nm 28/20 nm. They freely admit that the same generation foundry processes have better
> > > density. Each node has scaled quite well from the previous one. 14/16 nm will have no effective
> > > shrink outside of what you can wring from having better performing devices.)
> > >
> >
> > Even former Intel people agrees on that Intel relabeled nodes and reinvented the nanometer for marketing
> > purposes. Hans (Chip architect) has explained this silly marketing game much better than I could do:
> >
> >
No, What TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF said is:
> >
> > We call these processes 14nm / 16nm because:
> > Intel deviated from the official ITRS process naming rules and Intel
> > marketing/shareholders always abuse this against us to claim they
> > are many, many years ahead.
> >

> > Indeed, based on BEOL density Intel's processes should have been called
> > differently according to the official ITRS naming standards:
> >
> > Intel's 65nm should have been called 80nm instead.
> > Intel's 45nm should have been called 55nm instead.
> > Intel's 32nm should have been called 39nm instead.
> >
> > You can see this in the graph below:
> >
> > -The blue squares show the official metal 1 half pitches according to the ITRS.
> > -The purple circles and squares are the actual BEOL metal 1 half pitches of Intel's processes.
> >
> > You can see that going from 90nm to 65nm Intel improved the BEOL MT1
> > by only 5%. They did exactly the same then as TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF
> > are doing now.
> >
> > It is due to the ignorance of the general public, which has no knowledge
> > of the official process naming rules, that TSMC/IBM/Samsung/GF are
> > forced to deviate from the official naming rules in the same way as Intel
> > did.

> >
> > > You're also ignoring the fact that no one has even announced ship dates for any 14/16 nm products. Until
> > > now we've seen maybe 1 HVM 20 nm parts, the Qualcomm modem. No one other than Intel has started HVM of any
> > > 14/16 nm parts. Forget even just one low power part like
> > > Intel. TSMC claims risk production of 16 nm started
> > > in late 2013. We aren't going to see any 16 nm parts in products until 2H 2015 at the earliest. That's a
> > > 2 year delta. And you think that 10 nm is just going to show up the next year. The foundries might have
> > > decided what their 10 nm process is going to look like by then, forget actually making anything.
> >
> > Broadwell-EP is expected for Q4 2015. Several ARM servers are expected for 2016, including AMD K12.
> > Nobody will be announcing ship dates this early, but the products are expected for that time.
>
> If you continue to believe that M1 half-pitch is all that matters when comparing process technologies,
> I don't suppose there's any point in discussing this with you. That might have been true 20 years
> ago when everyone's transistors were identical, wire delay was meaningless, leakage didn't matter
> and no one even bothered considering design rules, but it certainly isn't true now.

What I said is again different to what you interpret. Moreover, this is a slide from a talk given by Andrew B Kahng the past year (it is not 20 years ago)


< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeYuhong Bao2014/08/03 01:24 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJoe User2014/08/03 03:51 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 09:06 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeMichael S2014/08/03 11:44 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/04 07:45 AM
        DiscountsRob Thorpe2014/08/04 12:57 PM
          DiscountsAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:34 AM
        An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeAaron Spink2014/08/05 01:32 AM
          Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureanon2014/08/06 01:48 PM
            Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureUngo2014/08/06 04:34 PM
            Current trajectory favors arm-book in futureDoug S2014/08/06 08:21 PM
            The return to irrelevance.Alberto2014/08/07 02:04 AM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeJacob Marley2014/08/04 03:07 AM
  An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeanon2014/08/03 09:29 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeExophase2014/08/03 10:05 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseeNiels Jørgen Kruse2014/08/03 10:32 PM
    An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseeex-apple2014/08/04 05:20 PM
      An ARM-based Mac article by GasseePatrick Chase2014/08/04 06:51 PM
        Mac Intel urban legendsWes Felter2014/08/05 07:19 PM
          Mac Intel urban legendsUngo2014/08/06 02:09 PM
  An ARM-based Mac article by Gasseejuanrga2014/08/04 01:05 AM
    Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:01 AM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/04 02:20 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/04 06:46 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/04 07:14 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/05 01:11 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:40 AM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 08:51 AM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:11 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Doug S2014/08/05 01:15 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/05 04:42 PM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/06 05:04 PM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?vvid2014/08/08 03:35 AM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 01:58 PM
      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/05 09:27 AM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Michael S2014/08/08 03:58 AM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 10:00 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Klimax2014/08/08 12:17 PM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/08 03:48 PM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/08 05:40 PM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:51 PM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 04:57 AM
                    Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Aaron Spink2014/08/09 06:43 AM
                      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 07:06 AM
                      Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Jukka Larja2014/08/17 03:40 AM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 08:50 AM
                  Intel binning advantagePaul A. Clayton2014/08/09 09:58 AM
                  Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ronald Maas2014/08/10 06:12 PM
                    Where is the profit?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 08:23 PM
                Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Ungo2014/08/11 02:02 PM
        Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?David Kanter2014/08/08 10:41 PM
          Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?juanrga2014/08/09 05:01 AM
            Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?dmcq2014/08/09 09:10 AM
              Why either or, why not both for the Pro line?Exophase2014/08/10 09:20 AM
  Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Mark Roulo2014/08/04 07:43 AM
    Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Anon2014/08/04 12:17 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Kevin G2014/08/05 10:11 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Ricardo B2014/08/05 01:30 PM
    Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Maxwell2014/08/04 06:55 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?gallier22014/08/05 12:28 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?Patrick Chase2014/08/05 07:48 AM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:59 PM
      Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/05 03:56 PM
        Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?rwessel2014/08/05 04:40 PM
          Shouldn't Gassee get his basic facts right?David Hess2014/08/06 10:59 AM
  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/06 02:51 AM
    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/06 04:01 AM
    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/06 10:55 AM
      A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:54 PM
        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/06 06:57 PM
        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechPatrick Chase2014/08/07 08:39 AM
        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 09:49 AM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/08 10:23 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 11:09 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/08 12:12 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/08 03:36 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 12:31 AM
                    Actually, he did.iz2014/08/09 01:05 AM
                      Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:36 AM
                        Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/09 01:51 AM
                          Actually, he did.juanrga2014/08/09 04:26 AM
                            Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 10:01 AM
                              Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/10 11:29 AM
                                Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/10 01:04 PM
                                  Actually, he did.Wilco2014/08/11 01:52 AM
                                    Actually, he did.Klimax2014/08/11 10:08 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/08 01:26 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 10:01 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechKlimax2014/08/09 01:10 PM
                    x87 taxMichael S2014/08/09 01:37 PM
                      x87 taxKlimax2014/08/10 07:48 AM
                        Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/11 03:07 PM
                          Visual C and x87rwessel2014/08/11 05:32 PM
                            Visual C and x87Eugene Nalimov2014/08/12 08:29 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjoel2014/08/11 03:21 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:29 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/09 03:22 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 04:03 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/09 08:55 AM
                    Complexity = f (area, X, Y) not f(area)Paul A. Clayton2014/08/09 12:47 PM
                    x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.dmcq2014/08/10 04:09 AM
                        x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Jouni Osmala2014/08/10 04:53 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/10 05:24 AM
                        x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/10 06:24 AM
                          x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.juanrga2014/08/11 06:05 PM
                            x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Aaron Spink2014/08/11 07:28 PM
                        Stop trollingDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:12 PM
                          Stop trollingExophase2014/08/10 08:34 PM
                            Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsjuanrga2014/08/11 05:38 PM
                              Thunder chips dissipate 20 to 95 watts for SoCsKlimax2014/08/11 09:03 PM
                          Is comparing to highest bin fair?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/11 12:37 AM
                            Is comparing to highest bin fair?David Kanter2014/08/13 11:18 AM
                              What kind of comparison was intended?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/13 03:18 PM
                          Stop ignoring datajuanrga2014/08/11 06:00 PM
                            Stop ignoring dataKlimax2014/08/11 09:06 PM
                              Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 01:21 AM
                                Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:24 AM
                                  Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:00 AM
                                    Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:08 AM
                                      Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 02:25 AM
                                Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 05:29 AM
                                  Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadejuanrga2014/08/12 10:19 AM
                                    Seriously guys stop this anti-ARM charadeKlimax2014/08/12 01:08 PM
                                Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called JuanrgaJ Random Hacker2014/08/19 04:47 PM
                                  Seriously guys stop this pro-ARM troll called Juanrgaanon2014/08/20 02:46 PM
                            Design targets aren't dataDavid Kanter2014/08/13 12:07 PM
                              I agreejuanrga2014/08/13 02:16 PM
                                I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/14 10:37 PM
                                  Not again, thanksjuanrga2014/08/15 02:22 AM
                                  I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 06:40 AM
                                    I agreeMichael S2014/08/15 06:55 AM
                                      I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:43 AM
                                      I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:28 AM
                                    I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 08:41 AM
                                      I agreejuanrga2014/08/15 10:39 AM
                                        I agreeKlimax2014/08/15 12:57 PM
                                        I agreeDavid Kanter2014/08/15 02:01 PM
                                          on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/15 03:41 PM
                                            on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 02:15 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 02:56 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 03:39 AM
                                                  on ISAs and a plea for pieceKlimax2014/08/16 06:52 AM
                                                    on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 10:21 AM
                                            on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 07:51 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceMaynard Handley2014/08/16 08:45 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 09:14 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for piecejuanrga2014/08/16 09:54 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/16 10:32 AM
                                              on ISAs and a plea for pieceSymmetry2014/08/17 05:32 AM
                                                on ISAs and a plea for pieceRicardo B2014/08/17 06:07 AM
                                          K12Alexko2014/08/15 04:43 PM
                                            K12David Kanter2014/08/15 05:54 PM
                                              K12Alexko2014/08/16 02:14 AM
                                              K12juanrga2014/08/16 03:34 AM
                                                Sorry cannot share any detailsDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:31 AM
                                                  K12, some guesses/leaksjuanrga2014/08/18 01:48 PM
                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 01:56 AM
                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Kira2014/08/16 08:07 AM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:56 AM
                                                "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Doug S2014/08/16 09:28 AM
                                                  "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 11:01 AM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/16 12:56 PM
                                                      "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 01:29 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 02:08 PM
                                                          Metal pitchesDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:20 PM
                                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/17 03:14 PM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]juanrga2014/08/16 10:49 AM
                                            Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 10:27 AM
                                              Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/16 11:45 AM
                                                Intel manufacturing advantage is still hereDavid Kanter2014/08/16 01:16 PM
                                                  Intel manufacturing advantage is still herejuanrga2014/08/17 01:52 PM
                                                    History is very usefulDavid Kanter2014/08/17 02:18 PM
                                                      History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsjuanrga2014/08/17 03:33 PM
                                                        History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:28 PM
                                                          History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsPurana Archer2014/08/18 02:32 AM
                                                            History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/18 07:17 AM
                                                              History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsMaynard Handley2014/08/18 12:36 PM
                                                                History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsGabriele Svelto2014/08/19 12:53 AM
                                                                History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionstarlinian2014/08/19 12:14 PM
                                                        History is very useful, but can not be used to make infallible predictionsAaron Spink2014/08/17 09:10 PM
                                                        Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:36 AM
                                                          Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/19 02:00 AM
                                                            Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 03:33 AM
                                                              Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 07:17 AM
                                                                Intel has process advantage.Michael S2014/08/20 07:58 AM
                                                                  Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/20 04:11 PM
                                                                Intel has process advantage.Jouni Osmala2014/08/20 10:49 PM
                                                                  Intel has process advantage.dmcq2014/08/21 12:51 AM
                                                                    Intel has process advantage.juanrga2014/08/21 02:05 AM
                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/21 01:15 AM
                                                                    Could you please stopDaniel B2014/08/21 03:41 AM
                                                                      Could you please stopanon2014/08/21 08:20 AM
                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 11:29 AM
                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 01:14 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/25 02:11 PM
                                                                          Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/25 09:12 PM
                                                                            Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:16 AM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:38 AM
                                                                                Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 02:52 AM
                                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 02:55 AM
                                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 03:07 AM
                                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:40 AM
                                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingAaron Spink2014/08/26 03:50 AM
                                                                                  Intel process advantage is shrinkingDavid Kanter2014/08/26 05:25 PM
                                                                                    Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:10 AM
                                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/27 03:15 AM
                                                                            Intel process advantage is shrinkingMaynard Handley2014/08/26 01:49 PM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 03:44 PM
                                                                              Intel process advantage is shrinkingKlimax2014/08/26 09:37 PM
                                                                      Intel process advantage is shrinkingDoug S2014/08/25 09:24 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingdmcq2014/08/25 11:17 PM
                                                                        Intel process advantage is shrinkingjuanrga2014/08/26 01:22 AM
                                                                      Are you really that daft?Daniel B2014/08/26 04:00 AM
                                                                        Are you really that daft?Ronald Maas2014/08/26 03:37 PM
                                                                          Conservative, or just realistic?Daniel B2014/08/27 12:27 AM
                                                                      Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 12:34 PM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 01:21 PM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/27 02:38 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:22 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:26 AM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overMaynard Handley2014/08/27 02:56 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 10:14 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overgallier22014/08/28 01:42 AM
                                                                              Some new data to scrap overWilco2014/08/28 04:11 AM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/27 03:35 PM
                                                                          Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink2014/08/27 11:04 PM
                                                                            Some new data to scrap overjuanrga2014/08/28 05:57 AM
                                                                        Some new data to scrap overRicardo B2014/08/29 08:14 AM
                                                Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Doug S2014/08/16 07:06 PM
                                                  Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?Ricardo B2014/08/17 06:01 AM
                                                  Will there ever be a desktop Broadwell?juanrga2014/08/17 01:43 PM
                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Aaron Spink2014/08/16 08:10 PM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]dmcq2014/08/17 01:58 AM
                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:06 AM
                                                "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 09:40 AM
                                                  "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:37 AM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 12:12 PM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/17 12:12 PM
                                                    "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 12:15 PM
                                                      "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 12:45 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Michael S2014/08/17 01:13 PM
                                                        "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]David Kanter2014/08/17 02:29 PM
                                                          "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/17 03:10 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]tarlinian2014/08/17 04:08 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Klimax2014/08/17 09:42 PM
                                                              "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Maynard Handley2014/08/18 12:21 PM
                                                            "Intel no longer has an obvious lead in process technology" [electronicsweekly]Alberto2014/08/18 03:19 AM
                                                            Die Size matters a LOT!Jouni Osmala2014/08/18 12:21 PM
                                        I agreeDavid Hess2014/08/17 02:24 PM
                                      I agreeRonald Maas2014/08/15 10:14 PM
                                        I agreedmcq2014/08/16 02:53 AM
                                          Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 03:55 AM
                                            Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/16 04:40 AM
                                              Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 10:43 AM
                                                Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/16 09:07 PM
                                                  Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:35 PM
                                                    Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/17 03:24 PM
                                                      Beyond web serversdmcq2014/08/18 04:50 AM
                                                        Beyond web serversAaron Spink2014/08/18 02:58 PM
                                            Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 11:43 AM
                                              Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/16 11:55 AM
                                                Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/16 12:04 PM
                                                  Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 07:19 AM
                                                    Beyond web serversrwessel2014/08/17 08:34 AM
                                                    Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 09:23 AM
                                                      Beyond web serversMichael S2014/08/17 10:04 AM
                                                        Beyond web serversRicardo B2014/08/17 10:37 AM
                                                          Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 11:31 AM
                                                      Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 03:59 PM
                                                        Beyond web serversDavid Kanter2014/08/17 05:42 PM
                                                          Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/18 01:39 PM
                                              Beyond web serversGabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:33 PM
                                                Beyond web serversRonald Maas2014/08/17 08:06 AM
                                                  Amdahl's law (NT)Michael S2014/08/17 10:08 AM
                                                Beyond web serversjuanrga2014/08/17 01:41 PM
                                      Xeon-class performancePaul A. Clayton2014/08/16 09:31 AM
                                        Xeon-class performancejuanrga2014/08/16 10:53 AM
                                          Xeon-class performanceKlimax2014/08/17 01:29 PM
                              Design targets aren't datadistantobserver2014/08/16 11:22 AM
                      x86 theoretical limit on maximum performance.Kevin G2014/08/10 09:26 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:25 PM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/10 08:15 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:03 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:33 PM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnone2014/08/11 12:35 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechnope2014/08/11 01:05 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 03:02 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRicardo B2014/08/11 03:04 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:10 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:44 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/09 11:37 PM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:07 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 04:13 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechGabriele Svelto2014/08/11 11:08 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 08:32 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:11 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 04:27 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 10:30 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 02:56 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:23 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:29 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/11 07:30 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 07:46 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/12 04:48 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMegol2014/08/13 08:25 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/13 03:55 PM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechDavid Kanter2014/08/08 10:36 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/08 11:12 PM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/09 02:00 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:54 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/10 08:50 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechExophase2014/08/10 09:35 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:20 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:48 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 03:10 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:43 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/11 05:21 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:38 AM
              ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/09 09:50 AM
                ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 10:51 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/09 12:36 PM
                    ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/09 09:37 PM
                      ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 01:21 AM
                        ISA doesn't matterdmcq2014/08/10 03:06 AM
                        ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 01:21 PM
                          ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/10 08:03 PM
                            ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/10 10:45 PM
                              ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 11:57 PM
                              ISA doesn't matteranon2014/08/11 03:18 AM
                                ISA doesn't matterBrett2014/08/16 02:38 PM
                              ISA doesn't matter -- PARMAook2014/08/26 10:50 AM
                          IBM fab business is losing money, the POWER line is notMark Roulo2014/08/11 06:44 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterTREZA2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 04:34 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterMichael S2014/08/10 05:01 AM
                        ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:28 PM
                          ISA does matterMichael S2014/08/12 12:20 AM
                            ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 01:38 AM
                              ISA does matterAaron Spink2014/08/12 02:06 AM
                                ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:27 AM
                                  ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 02:28 PM
                                    ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/12 02:43 PM
                                      Banning of Juanrgagallier22014/08/13 07:56 AM
                                        bad idea (NT)Michael S2014/08/13 08:02 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterAaron Spink2014/08/10 06:48 AM
                      Best *Student* Paper Paul A. Clayton2014/08/10 11:31 AM
                ISA doesn't matterjuanrga2014/08/10 03:32 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterWilco2014/08/10 04:48 AM
                    ISA doesn't matterLinus Torvalds2014/08/10 10:38 AM
                      ISA doesn't matterUngo2014/08/11 02:59 PM
                ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/11 06:17 AM
                  ISA doesn't matterGabriele Svelto2014/08/12 10:31 PM
                    ISA doesn't matterEtienne2014/08/13 02:09 AM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/09 02:44 AM
            A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/09 05:43 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechanon2014/08/09 09:17 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/09 11:38 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 12:41 PM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 12:49 PM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 01:13 PM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 01:30 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/09 02:15 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechcarop2014/08/10 01:01 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 03:50 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:23 AM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:38 AM
                                Thank you (NT)Michael S2014/08/10 06:16 AM
                                Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Alberto2014/08/11 01:57 AM
                                  Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.Wilco2014/08/11 02:14 AM
                                  Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.David Hess2014/08/11 10:56 AM
                                    Nope, Samsung ARM cpu was canned.juanrga2014/08/11 06:32 PM
                              ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:34 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:19 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/09 02:10 PM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 02:01 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAlberto2014/08/10 05:17 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 02:40 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 03:27 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 04:00 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 04:50 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 05:51 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:04 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/10 07:30 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 07:46 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechWilco2014/08/11 04:37 PM
                              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 12:58 AM
                                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:11 AM
                                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/12 01:22 AM
                                    A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/12 01:40 AM
                                Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:29 AM
                                  Applied Micro systems not benchmarkedjuanrga2014/08/13 10:51 AM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 07:48 AM
                            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/10 08:19 AM
                    A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechjuanrga2014/08/10 05:00 AM
                      A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/10 05:18 AM
                        A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/10 01:12 PM
                          A strong answer to this crap article on Extremetechdmcq2014/08/10 01:43 PM
          A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechRonald Maas2014/08/10 09:56 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechpTmd2014/08/10 11:57 PM
            A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechAaron Spink2014/08/11 12:02 AM
              ISA importance and bike sheddingPaul A. Clayton2014/08/11 01:39 AM
              A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 02:43 AM
                A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechMichael S2014/08/11 04:56 AM
                  A strong answer to this crap article on ExtremetechJouni Osmala2014/08/11 11:14 AM
            ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/11 06:48 PM
              ISA does matterUngo2014/08/12 03:37 PM
                ISA does matterjuanrga2014/08/13 04:18 AM
            Look at the system level, ISA doesn't matterDavid Kanter2014/08/13 10:47 AM
              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Mark Roulo2014/08/14 07:30 AM
                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 03:29 AM
                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 08:35 AM
                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...juanrga2014/08/16 10:35 AM
                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 11:55 AM
                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 01:24 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 01:54 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 02:56 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 02:02 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...David Kanter2014/08/16 03:09 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 04:43 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/16 05:35 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:17 PM
                              OS/2Ricardo B2014/08/16 06:20 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:36 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:24 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 12:41 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:20 AM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/16 08:43 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/16 10:30 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:28 AM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 09:25 PM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/16 11:10 PM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/16 11:42 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 02:40 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 05:43 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:53 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 06:42 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ronald Maas2014/08/17 08:57 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/17 09:40 AM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 11:06 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/17 12:56 PM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/17 01:22 PM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Ricardo B2014/08/17 02:14 PM
                                      cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/17 04:56 PM
                                        cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 10:34 AM
                                          cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 11:31 AM
                                            cheap membarsnksingh2014/08/21 01:54 PM
                                              cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/21 05:40 PM
                                            cheap membarsanon2014/08/21 10:17 PM
                                              cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 02:16 AM
                                                cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 06:33 AM
                                                  cheap membarsMichael S2014/08/22 07:18 AM
                                                    cheap membarsanon2014/08/22 04:50 PM
                                                      cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:06 AM
                                                        cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/24 10:11 AM
                                                          cheap membarsanon2014/08/24 06:21 PM
                                                            cheap membarsPatrick Chase2014/08/25 10:02 AM
                                                              cheap membarsdmcq2014/08/30 01:15 AM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/17 09:55 PM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Howard Chu2014/08/28 08:17 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/29 06:35 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 07:34 AM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 PM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...foobar2014/08/30 08:26 PM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/31 03:54 AM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Wilco2014/08/31 11:52 AM
                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 08:52 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Maynard Handley2014/08/17 09:31 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/18 01:11 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 02:55 AM
                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:15 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:23 AM
                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/25 08:26 PM
                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Patrick Chase2014/08/25 10:32 PM
                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 03:41 AM
                                    POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 05:06 AM
                                      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 04:27 PM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/26 10:02 PM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink2014/08/26 10:51 PM
                                            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 07:25 PM
                                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/28 09:45 PM
                                              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel2014/08/29 12:14 AM
                                                POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon2014/08/29 02:49 AM
                                                  POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S2014/08/29 05:43 AM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...nksingh2014/08/26 10:54 PM
                                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 01:29 AM
                                          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq2014/08/27 07:16 AM
                                    Idiom recognition for LL/SC?Paul A. Clayton2014/08/26 12:28 PM
                        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Gabriele Svelto2014/08/16 10:22 PM
                      AltiVec was Power6 (NT)Kira2014/08/17 10:33 AM
                        AltiVec was Power6Maynard Handley2014/08/17 11:29 AM
                          AltiVec was Power6Kira2014/08/17 11:53 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?