By: Aaron Spink (aaronspink.delete@this.notearthlink.net), August 17, 2014 10:10 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on August 17, 2014 4:33 pm wrote:
> Don't misinterpret me. My mention of TSX was to bring one example of how recent history couldn't be used
> to predict the problems that Intel has now with TSX. I never said that was relevant to manufacturing.
>
>
except that if you understood history, you would realize that something like the bug in TSX is perfectly normal in the scheme of things.
Look at errata list for just about any processor. The fact that something as ambitious as TSX has a bug, is hardly surprising.
> Don't misinterpret me. My mention of TSX was to bring one example of how recent history couldn't be used
> to predict the problems that Intel has now with TSX. I never said that was relevant to manufacturing.
>
>
except that if you understood history, you would realize that something like the bug in TSX is perfectly normal in the scheme of things.
Look at errata list for just about any processor. The fact that something as ambitious as TSX has a bug, is hardly surprising.
