By: dmcq (dmcq.delete@this.fano.co.uk), August 20, 2014 5:11 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 20, 2014 8:58 am wrote:
...
> Sound like revisionist history to me. The was no great fanfare
> and ARM was not even considered a significant competitor.
Significant enough to be talked about as a target for the next five years at IDF 2007
http://news.cnet.com/Intel-has-ARM-in-its-crosshairs/2100-1006_3-6210033.html
Intel knew its first Atoms simply weren't competitive but later Atoms certainly were introduced with talk about crushing ARM.
...
> Sound like revisionist history to me. The was no great fanfare
> and ARM was not even considered a significant competitor.
Significant enough to be talked about as a target for the next five years at IDF 2007
http://news.cnet.com/Intel-has-ARM-in-its-crosshairs/2100-1006_3-6210033.html
Intel knew its first Atoms simply weren't competitive but later Atoms certainly were introduced with talk about crushing ARM.
