() on 2/4/03 wrote:
---------------------------
>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?AID=RWT071800000000
>
>
>On page four, third paragraph down,
>you are contradicting your current
>position on a couple of topics.

Have you looked at the date when this article was written?

Do you find it surprising that I would change my position when better
and more complete information becomes available that contradicts
my earlier held view?

>
>Namely a discussion a few days ago
>about which targets Intel marketed
>processors (i386/i486/i586) at their
>introduction. This was in the
>"unsettling comments from AMD"
>thread. And also, (And I could be
>wrong on this one) that Intel never
>claimed to have plans to move EPIC
>towards the mainstream starting with
>"Deerfield". I could be confusing
>you with someone else on the second
>point, so please take that with a big
>grain of salt. My memory is not what
>it used to be, perhaps I'm going senile!

I was mistaken when I wrote that. Deerfield never targeted the desktop.
BTW, I never claimed that Intel said that it would.