Gabriele Svelto (gabriele.svelto.delete@this.gmail.com) on December 10, 2014 7:06 am wrote:
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on December 10, 2014 4:15 am wrote:
> > I don't understand your response -- it is saying a lot, in fact it is saying
> > exactly that the Apple problems were credible and not just anecdotes.
>
> I meant that a vendor not acknowledging a problem doesn't mean that the problem isn't there.

That's not what I used the Apple example for. I did not somehow bring it up to try to "prove" that an Android problem did not exist! It was to show that the Apple problem did exist

> In Apple's case
> it was hard to deny it consider it had struck a significant number of users. In Google's case they don't seem
> to care much, possibly because the actual user-base of Nexus devices upgrading to Lollipop is a lot smaller
> than Apple's and besides most other Android users will be at the mercy of their vendors anyway.
>
> > I'm not doubting there are problems, but the link indicates that the recommended
> > procedure is to upgrade when the OTA image is ready. Is it true that flashing with
> > this factory image is something that mainly developers and enthusiasts would do?
>
> I did the upgrade using the OTA image; I'm now considering of
> flashing the factory image in the hope it fixes my problems.

Okay fair enough, I was just curious.