By: Eric Bron (eric.bron.delete@this.zvisuel.privatefortest.com), January 3, 2015 2:42 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on January 3, 2015 12:02 pm wrote:
> Eric Bron nli (eric.bron.delete@this.zvisuel.com) on January 2, 2015 2:28 pm wrote:
> > > I still recall when he pretended that Intel had abandoned manycores with the new Xeon
> > > Phi
> >
> > link ?
>
> http://www.realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=143796&curpostid=143824
thank you for the link, he was saying "going away" not "abandoned, which is factually true speaking of the near future evolution of MIC, i.e. roughly same number of cores in 14 nm KNL than 22 nm KNC, whatever your favorite marketing material says about it
as others have already tried to explain you, it's the opposite to what was "predicted" in a series of papers you have posted on this very forum saying that the future is with more simpler cores
> Eric Bron nli (eric.bron.delete@this.zvisuel.com) on January 2, 2015 2:28 pm wrote:
> > > I still recall when he pretended that Intel had abandoned manycores with the new Xeon
> > > Phi
> >
> > link ?
>
> http://www.realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=143796&curpostid=143824
thank you for the link, he was saying "going away" not "abandoned, which is factually true speaking of the near future evolution of MIC, i.e. roughly same number of cores in 14 nm KNL than 22 nm KNC, whatever your favorite marketing material says about it
as others have already tried to explain you, it's the opposite to what was "predicted" in a series of papers you have posted on this very forum saying that the future is with more simpler cores