By: juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com), January 10, 2015 8:25 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Aaron Spink (aaronspink.delete@this.notearthlink.net) on January 10, 2015 7:21 pm wrote:
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on January 10, 2015 6:32 pm wrote:
> > Any GPU that I know fits the manycore definition.
> >
>
> How? Most GPUs have the same if not less cores than something like a E5-2699v3 which no one would
> consider manycore. For instance something like the GM204 is basically a 16 core design.
>
> > I am claiming that KNL is manycore because KNL fits the manycore
> > definition and is aimed to compete against GPGPUs.
> >
> KNL doesn't have enough cores to even be considered a real manycore. Not to
> mention that KNL is using multi-issue OOE cores. if anything, from programming
> model to functionality, KNL is just a high core count multi-core.
>
>
And this proves again that you don't even know what a manycore is. Bye!
> juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on January 10, 2015 6:32 pm wrote:
> > Any GPU that I know fits the manycore definition.
> >
>
> How? Most GPUs have the same if not less cores than something like a E5-2699v3 which no one would
> consider manycore. For instance something like the GM204 is basically a 16 core design.
>
> > I am claiming that KNL is manycore because KNL fits the manycore
> > definition and is aimed to compete against GPGPUs.
> >
> KNL doesn't have enough cores to even be considered a real manycore. Not to
> mention that KNL is using multi-issue OOE cores. if anything, from programming
> model to functionality, KNL is just a high core count multi-core.
>
>
And this proves again that you don't even know what a manycore is. Bye!