By: coppice (coppice.delete@this.dis.org), January 13, 2015 9:44 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on January 13, 2015 7:53 am wrote:
> coppice (coppice.delete@this.dis.org) on January 12, 2015 9:47 pm wrote:
> > I forgot that the Intel chips also seemed to take considerably
> > more power than the Denver to do the same work.
> >
>
> Do you know it or do you believe it?
> The same question goes for your above statement about relative die sizes.
I said "seemed" because I have been information on the web which appears to show the Haswell taking considerably more power, but I'm not sure if they were being careful to ensure a fair comparison.
If I can trust the various die pictures and quoted dimensions I have found, the Denver core seems a little smaller than the Clovertrail core. Allow for one being 28nm and the other 32nm, and they seem to work out about the same for equivalent geometries. How does the Haswell core size compare with Clovertrail?
> coppice (coppice.delete@this.dis.org) on January 12, 2015 9:47 pm wrote:
> > I forgot that the Intel chips also seemed to take considerably
> > more power than the Denver to do the same work.
> >
>
> Do you know it or do you believe it?
> The same question goes for your above statement about relative die sizes.
I said "seemed" because I have been information on the web which appears to show the Haswell taking considerably more power, but I'm not sure if they were being careful to ensure a fair comparison.
If I can trust the various die pictures and quoted dimensions I have found, the Denver core seems a little smaller than the Clovertrail core. Allow for one being 28nm and the other 32nm, and they seem to work out about the same for equivalent geometries. How does the Haswell core size compare with Clovertrail?
