coppice (coppice.delete@this.dis.org) on January 13, 2015 9:44 am wrote:
> Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on January 13, 2015 7:53 am wrote:
> > coppice (coppice.delete@this.dis.org) on January 12, 2015 9:47 pm wrote:
> > > I forgot that the Intel chips also seemed to take considerably
> > > more power than the Denver to do the same work.
> > >
> >
> > Do you know it or do you believe it?
> > The same question goes for your above statement about relative die sizes.
>
> I said "seemed" because I have been information on the web which appears to show the Haswell taking
> considerably more power, but I'm not sure if they were being careful to ensure a fair comparison.
>
> If I can trust the various die pictures and quoted dimensions I have found, the Denver core seems a little
> smaller than the Clovertrail core. Allow for one being 28nm and the other 32nm, and they seem to work out
> about the same for equivalent geometries. How does the Haswell core size compare with Clovertrail?

Haswell: 14.5 mm2 (22nm)
Clovertrail: 5.6 mm2 (32nm)
Denver: ~5.4 mm2 (28nm)