Sylvain Collange (full.name.delete.delete@this.this.gmail.com) on July 8, 2015 6:30 am wrote:
> Patrick Chase (patrickjchase.delete@this.gmai.com) on July 7, 2015 10:49 am wrote:
> > 2. Do existing branch predictors really have that information? I thought that
> > even modern ones still tended to keep a fairly small amount of per-context state
> > (where "context" is a catch-all for the branch address, histories, etc).
>
> Modern predictors can generally provide a confidence estimate for each prediction. However,
> the conditions of select/cmov-like instructions are generally not part of the history.
>
> A related issue is that selectively predicting select/cmov may cause history
> corruption, which degrades the overall branch prediction accuracy.
> These issues are discussed in more detail in this paper: http://hal.inria.fr/hal-00910335/

Thanks for the reference.
BTW, seeing Andre Seznec's name there, does any commercial processor yet implement a PPM or TAGE-like predictor yet?