First you basically claim that 1=2 because 1x2=2, now I guess you realized that and accuse us of nitpicking on terminology. Which would be fine, if you were not the one who started this whole subthread by proposing your very own definition of wideness. Of course we're going to nitpick about terminology, as terminology is the topic at hand.

You have been meaning to talk about issue width all along, as I suspected and suggested in my first response to you. There, Skylake and Haswell are indeed equals.

So man up and admit that your definition didn't make sense, or at least stop accusing others of pushing you into the hole you that dug for yourself.