juanrga (nospam.delete@this.juanrga.com) on November 6, 2015 5:19 am wrote:
> lurker (lurker9000.delete@this.realemail.mail) on November 5, 2015 1:54 pm wrote:
> > Poindexter (cherullo.delete@this.gmail.com) on November 4, 2015 6:10 am wrote:
> > > Looks like you made the news:
> > > http://wccftech.com/amd-zen/
> >
> > Forum posts qualify for news these days? Not saying what I posted was not the
> > truth, but I would expect news websites to post information they can prove or
> > at least comes from a reliable source. Kind of disappointed to be honest.
>
> Except two or three sites, the whole tech new sites are in a very low quality those days. Recall
> all sites that reproduced the fake Zen slides posted in certain german forum. After my demonstration
> the slides were fake, after AMD gave the real slides at FAD 2015, still you can find tech sites
> that reproduce the fake slides when write news about Zen. You can write them in the comment
> section, but they will ignore you and will repeat the fake slides again.

Speaking strictly for myself, I didn't see your posts in my own stories on the topic. I didn't ignore it. I just didn't see it.