Geekbench 4

By: anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com), July 29, 2016 11:03 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
John Poole (john.delete@this.primatelabs.com) on July 29, 2016 11:57 am wrote:
> Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on July 29, 2016 9:08 am wrote:
> > anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on July 28, 2016 10:58 pm wrote:
> > > Can you then provide a description of the benchmark here or somewhere that doesn't require sign up?
> >
> >
> > Agreed. If you have to sign up and participate in the beta just to learn what components are in the
> > benchmark, then the odds of it being discussed here are pretty low. RWT is probably one of the best
> > places to find people who could make good suggestions and provide constructive criticism. We certainly
> > have provided a lot of criticism (some of it even constructive :)) about Geekbench in the past, though
> > it isn't as though other benchmarks like SPEC and TPC have escaped criticism here either.
> >
> > Obviously there is still a need for testing as descriptions of the benchmark
> > components can only take you so far, comparing results you get on different
> > hardware is also necessary to see how it really works is also needed.
> >
> > But the starting point should be "what is in it, and how
> > much will each component figure into the overall score?"
>
> Sure thing. Here's some preliminary documentation on the CPU workloads included
> in Geekbench 4: http://www.primatelabs.com/beta/v4-cpu-workloads.pdf

Thank you. I agree with the others, it looks much better. Good range of tests. Camera might indeed fit in a different category ("system"), but so long as all sub test results are reported, I don't mind.

Agree with verifying results too. If you can do it, you would not have to carry the entire output to verify against, just a hash.

What components are you building yourself, versus making use of on the host? For example the jpeg test it sounds like you are building the libjpeg library as part of your test, so you will always get a particular version of it. Whereas maybe you are linking against host libc?
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Geekbench 4John Poole2016/07/28 08:12 PM
  Geekbench 4anon2016/07/28 10:58 PM
    Geekbench 4Doug S2016/07/29 09:08 AM
      Geekbench 4John Poole2016/07/29 11:57 AM
        Geekbench 4someone2016/07/29 12:58 PM
        Geekbench 4Linus Torvalds2016/07/29 01:01 PM
          Geekbench 4John Poole2016/07/29 01:51 PM
            Geekbench 4Linus Torvalds2016/07/29 02:28 PM
        Geekbench 4Doug S2016/07/29 07:59 PM
          Geekbench 4Yoav2016/07/29 11:22 PM
            Geekbench 4Yoav2016/07/29 11:22 PM
        Geekbench 4anon2016/07/29 11:03 PM
          Geekbench 4Doug S2016/07/30 10:06 AM
            Geekbench 4Gabriele Svelto2016/07/30 12:49 PM
            Geekbench 4Maynard Handley2016/07/30 05:45 PM
        libjpeg, LLVM and sqliteGabriele Svelto2016/07/29 11:26 PM
        Geekbench 4none2016/07/31 10:48 AM
        Xcode7( llvm3.7?) vs Clang 3.8 xx2016/08/11 11:18 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?