By: Ireland (boh.delete@this.outlook.ie), February 2, 2017 5:06 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Anon (no.delete@this.email.com) on February 1, 2017 7:52 pm wrote:
>
>
> Has no global contextual sensitivity, but lots of semantic linking..
> Writes sentences that locally make sense, however barely make it to paragraphs before they lose the plot..
> Takes a few keywords from an existing discussion and tried to mold them on to another subject area..
> Uses highly unusual punctuation, however never appears to make spelling mistakes..
> Doesnt Sleep..
>
> I present to you Ireland, beta.
Anon,
A shitty beta, by the looks of it.
It's a nice way that you've constructed the analysis too. Like as if it were a software program, that you were tasked with the debugging of. Which is my point precisely. It's a different world outside the one of the comfort zone of the area of high levels of competence in engineering. That's a scary, scary idea isn't it?
Nevertheless, thanks for your very fair criticism. I'll take that with me, and apply the lessons of it, in my life.
You are way too good engineers, not to know certain things though. Right? When you reach the level of technical capability that you've have managed to achieve, you end up being in neglect of the other aspects of the game. When you're at that level of deep understanding of micro-architecture and software interaction - a question to ask is, what else do I need to know?
A good engineer, can become a great engineer, when they ask that question. That's simply what I wished to say. It's not about loosing confidence. Not about 'winning' or loosing in the technical arguments. It's something else, it's strategic.
Again, thanks and all the best.
>
>
> Has no global contextual sensitivity, but lots of semantic linking..
> Writes sentences that locally make sense, however barely make it to paragraphs before they lose the plot..
> Takes a few keywords from an existing discussion and tried to mold them on to another subject area..
> Uses highly unusual punctuation, however never appears to make spelling mistakes..
> Doesnt Sleep..
>
> I present to you Ireland, beta.
Anon,
A shitty beta, by the looks of it.
It's a nice way that you've constructed the analysis too. Like as if it were a software program, that you were tasked with the debugging of. Which is my point precisely. It's a different world outside the one of the comfort zone of the area of high levels of competence in engineering. That's a scary, scary idea isn't it?
Nevertheless, thanks for your very fair criticism. I'll take that with me, and apply the lessons of it, in my life.
You are way too good engineers, not to know certain things though. Right? When you reach the level of technical capability that you've have managed to achieve, you end up being in neglect of the other aspects of the game. When you're at that level of deep understanding of micro-architecture and software interaction - a question to ask is, what else do I need to know?
A good engineer, can become a great engineer, when they ask that question. That's simply what I wished to say. It's not about loosing confidence. Not about 'winning' or loosing in the technical arguments. It's something else, it's strategic.
Again, thanks and all the best.