RISC wars

By: Brett (ggtgp.delete@this.yahoo.com), April 16, 2017 7:56 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on April 16, 2017 5:48 pm wrote:
> Brett (ggtgp.delete@this.yahoo.com) on April 16, 2017 3:02 pm wrote:
> > dmcq (dmcq.delete@this.fano.co.uk) on April 16, 2017 4:36 am wrote:
> > > Brett (ggtgp.delete@this.yahoo.com) on April 15, 2017 4:18 pm wrote:
> > > > Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on April 15, 2017 1:04 pm wrote:
> > > > > Brett (ggtgp.delete@this.yahoo.com) on April 15, 2017 12:48 pm wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes this architecture looks a lot like the Mill, it's what
> > > > > > I was working on by myself before Mill was announced.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mill is certainly not stack-based. If anything, it is queue-based.
> > > >
> > > > I was making the concept easier to understand, letting values fall off the end of a belt is better than
> > > > resetting the stack every three instructions. (One bit in the push opcode can reset the stack.)
> > > > Though I wanted to make the micro-threads more visible to the hardware, makes going wider easier.
> > > >
> > > > The really nice part of this design is that you can put a ARM64 decoder on the front end in addition
> > > > to your own decoder. (I did not realize this two years ago.) You would dump ARM32 of course.
> > > >
> > > > > > The days of RISC are finally numbered, right when ARM64 has finally won the RISC wars. ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > Did ARM64 really win it?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, by every metric ARM64 has 99% market share of 64 bit RISC, and near that
> > > > for 32 bit RISC. (It will take a few years for autos to switch from PowerPC.)
> > > >
> > > > > Last time I looked, RISC-V crowd was convinced that the mother of all RISC wars is not started yet.
> > > >
> > > > Fools, but they are part of the natural timeline of expensive to near free.
> > > >
> > > > > Back to origins of the thread, IMHO, it would be pity if RISC-V wins at the end, because
> > > > > I think that it is not as good as the most current form of its ancestor.
> > > >
> > > > MIPS64, yuck.
> > > > What is with MicroMIPS having only 16 registers?
> > > > Two operand like x86 is plenty most of the time and an extension word can add a proper
> > > > destination register for the cases where you want three operands. Cutting the register
> > > > count to fit three operands into 16 bit instructions seems stupid to me.
> > > >
> > > > MIPS is basically declaring that having 32 registers was a mistake, which may be accurate.
> > > > Even if 32 registers is a mistake, this makes intermixing
> > > > MicroMIPS opcodes with MIPS64 opcodes more difficult.
> > > >
> > > > This causes image problems that make adoption more difficult. You
> > > > need a good marketing message to overcome this, which MIPS lacks.
> > >
> > > Personally if I was doing a stack machine I'd have the stack in memory. To make it efficient I'd
> > > have some stack access instructions that didn't check for clashes with indirect accesses and use
> > > them for automatic variables which didn't have their addresses passed around. Then the data accessed
> > > that way could be in a separate cache accessed earlier in the pipeline just like registers. It
> > > might be okay for micros that required fast interrupts and small code size, but one would need
> > > more instructions in general than RISC and have to stick them together to get efficiency.
> >
> > No one sane would design a stack machine today.
> > I am saying that RISC maps poorly to the underlying hardware at the six wide generation.
> > Ironically the 8087 stack does map fairly well to the underlying hardware,
> > or would if those were integer units instead of floating point units.
> >
> > Most programmers are no different than users, they do not care what
> > the compiler generates, they just want the code to run fast.
> > This is the market Mill is targeting.
> >
> > The real underlying architecture of a CPU is a set of ALU's with a bypass network and a tiny handful
> > of temp registers, with a limited number of cross connections to the other ALU's. Plus a limited number
> > of ports to the outside world, which in this case is the register file and the load/store unit.
> >
> > Over time and across a CPU portfolio, the design will have different numbers of ALU's and different
> > numbers of outside ports, and different cross connection network limits, and different numbers of
> > local temp slots, etc. so you cannot expose the underlying hardware to the instruction set.
> >
> > X86 and RISC do not scale greater than six wide on the base hardware achitecture we have.
> >
> > The Mill is but the first of many new instruction sets that will be coming out
> > over the next decade, and with patents lasting 20 years the Mill team hope to prosper
> > off those patents regards of whether people pick thier specific design.
> >
> > Before 1980 instruction sets mattered and there were lots of instruction sets, after 1980 all designs
> > had plenty of registers and the mantra changed to "instruction sets do not matter". We have hit an
> > inflection point and the pendulum flips back to instruction sets mattering again. At least until the
> > decision space has been fully mapped out, and the new set of post RISC designs take over.
> >
> > Note that we are also dependent on advancements in LLVM, so the
> > ideal architecture may be a moving target for a decade.
> >
> > I am all in with this prediction, just as I was pointing out the inflection
> > from fewer and fewwer CPU design firms, to more and more CPU design firms.
> >
>
> Let me try to summarize this all along two dimensions:
> (a) VLIW works well when dataflow and controlflow are both regular. That's
> basically what DSPs do, and everyone is happy with using it there.
>
> (b) When dataflow is irregular but controlflow is regular across many many independent loops, you're
> in the domain of GPUs and attempts to exploit that structure are what GPUs are all about. There remains
> uncertainty as to exactly the optimal way to do this --- just how valuable is the exploiting of the
> exact same instruction across multiple threads vs somewhat more flexible alternatives? But those are
> details, the bottom line is these are throughput engines with tons of registers, in-order, non-speculative,
> and (most importantly) something that is more-or-less equivalent to switch-thread-on-cache-miss. Any
> pool of lightweight cores (where the critical resource is the bandwidth to RAM) is functionally much
> the same, so Cell and Larrabee fall in this bucket as far as I'm concerned right now.
> (Aside, but this is where, IMHO, Apple's "GPU" will be situated". A generic sea of lightweight cores
> throughput engine speaking AArch64 [perhaps with a few extra special texture calls], and capable of not
> just GPU functionality but generic highly-multi-threaded functionality with less pain than a GPU.)
>
> (c) When dataflow and controlflow are irregular AND you don't have lots of threads to fall back to
> bail you out, THAT is what I would call "general purpose computation". How can we do that well?
> OK what do we know? The goal is not to be fast at every piece of code one can fantasize about,
> but to be fast on the code seen in the real world, using the techniques we know work.
> The goal is also to work with today's processes and economics, not the constraints
> of 1990. So area is a negligible constraint, power a massive constraint.
>
> Which means you HAVE TO exploit
> - superscalar/ILP
> - MLP
> - control speculation
> All three are non-negotiable. What, in turn, does this mean?
>
> You need a front-end that's as complex as what we have today in state of the art. So lots
> of SRAMs tracking previous history, and some smart logic to extract from all this the best
> guess at the next PC to feed the I-cache. We can remove the power cost for many loops (and
> most time is spent in loops) by having rich loop buffers, and everyone does this.
>
> What's not clear to me is the "richness" of extant loop buffers. In particular how well do they handle loops
> with branches embedded in them? Loop buffers are always portrayed as handling straight-through code runs of
> say, up to 32 or so instructions, which is depressingly limiting. There may be substantial scope here (remember,
> we're all about power, not area) for a secondary branch prediction sort of machinery scoped to the loop that
> allows us to run out of loop buffer (and a much smaller branch prediction engine) for many more, and rather
> larger, loops. (I'd expect the primary role of THIS branch prediction machinery to be not so much generating
> new PCs as to be generating some sort of "skip/nullify the next N instructions" vector.
>
> Note, as an aside, in this world, trace caches also play no role. Traces are
> essentially constructed on the fly these days by the branch machinery.
>
> Next, control speculation means you need a ROB, or more precisely SOMETHING that holds all your speculative
> state until its safe to commit. This means you also need either lots of physical registers or something
> that performs much the same role (like storing the result of each instruction in its ROB slot). So far so
> good. The ROB per se is cheap-ish, just a queue. The large number of physical registers is problematic,
> but can be finessed if all you really care about is holding state between when it's calculated and when
> it's committed. (Eg I can imagine a "ROB" split conceptually into two parts with one part corresponding
> to state stored in registers, the second corresponding to state stored in the queue. When the "register"
> ROB is forced to overflow, the oldest instructions spill to the in-queue-store and give up their
> register. I've never seen a paper with such an idea, but I don't see why it's not feasible.
> It's even possible, eg, that what IBM call their L2 register file in the POWER8 is such a concept?)
> Anyway, point is, again at this stage of what we *have to have* for control speculation (which
> we have to have, by definition for general purpose computing) is still limited to
> - big front end (but hopefully we can usually run out of the loop buffer)
> - large ROB (but cheap in both area and power)
> - not *so* large physical register file
>
> Next ILP. Option one is VLIW.
> The win is less time spent figuring out which instruction interferes
> with which other instruction (ie simpler issue).
> Costs are cross-generation compatibility. I don't care about this. As you all know, the world I
> care about is the Apple world, and I envisage the future as ever more that when you pull in your
> code from the app store, you get a binary optimized for your particular device from the bitcode
> that was dumped in the app store. Other people care massively about cross-generation compatibility
> and even cross-generation performance. That's their cross to bear, but doesn't interest me.
> Second cost, and this is the one that matters, is there are going to be hiccups in the data delivery, and
> we can't predict or control these. (Again, by our definition of general computing.) VLIW, or more precisely
> the giving up of dynamic scheduling that is the POINT of VLIW, can't seem to handle this well.
>
> So no VLIW means a stream of "independent" instructions. But this doesn't mean we're doomed. I suspect
> there's scope for different work at different places to tie instructions together to get at least of the
> VLIW win. We do some of this dynamically with instruction fusion. I'd be curious to see how much instruction
> fusion could be moved out to pre-decoding in the I-cache, handled one-time when instructions flow into
> that cache. Likewise when instructions are placed in the rich loop buffer, is there scope for useful annotation
> of these instructions to make scheduling cheaper? (You'll see what I mean by this soon.)
>
> But yeah, independent superscalar/ILP is nasty and power hungry. Everything we can do to reduce
> its impact we should. This seems to me to mean constructing the equivalent of VLIW bundles dynamically
> as much as possible: as much fusion as possible, as rich a loop buffer as possible.
>
> Note that everything to this point does NOT require OoO...
> What I'm trying to get at is instead of this sterile debate about RISC vs CISC
> or even VLIW vs RICS/CISC, the buzzwords that matter are superscalar, control
> speculation, MLP, and OoO. All somewhat independent and on a continuum.
>
> Finally we want lots of MLP. What does that require? First off we want to have dedicated TLB caches
> (holding whatever's appropriate from pieces of the higher order tables), prefetchers for these, and
> two page walkers. (It's just area..., no point in having to wait on this low-power stuff). We also want
> kickass prefetchers, working with each other not at cross-purposes. But that's all obvious, and it's
> not enough. We do need the ability for loads (and stores, but of course they are less pressing) to be
> able to sit in a pending state in such a way that later loads and stores can generate further memory
> misses. Our ideal state is that once one load misses to RAM, many many other loads also generate misses
> to RAM, so that our long wait from RAM is effectively amortized over these multiple loads.
> And this requires OoO :-( :-( :-(
>
> So is it game over? Do we have to have a deep issue pool, and a horribly power-hungry waker-upper/scheduler
> that also, to add insult to injury, probably limits our cycle time?
> Not necessarily...
> Why do we want / how do we exploit this OoO? In other words, what
> instructions tend to slip past each other and rearrange?
> One theoretical possible source of this slippage is bad instruction scheduling by the compiler. I
> don't care about this (for the reasons I gave above --- I'm assuming we have extra-CPU machinery that
> always produces well-scheduled binaries for this particular hardware). So that means the compiler
> knows the D-cache latency is 4 cycles (or whatever) and handles it appropriately. Likewise it knows
> how to construct an optimal dependency chain within loops and does the sane thing in unrolling loops.
> So we don't need a LARGE issue pool to dynamically unroll independent executions of loops.
> What we do need is
> - some buffering to handle the hiccups that arise when we miss in D-L1 and have to go to L2
> - something to handle when we miss in L2
>
> To handle this second issue, I commend to your attention the following paper
> from 2015 which hasn't (IMHO) got nearly the attention it deserves:
>
>
> The big idea is to introduce into the CPU a totally novel (in my experience anyway) form of statistics/speculation.
> Instructions that miss to RAM are tracked as are their dependencies and the instructions that feed
> into them. Based on these statistics as they are collected, instruction at the point of RENAME are
> separated into two streams, the "normal" stream and the stream that are expected not to have anything
> to do for a long time (because we're waiting on data from RAM).
> This differs from other superficially similar proposals (and seems to me much more tractable) in that this
> split is done based on statistics collected, NOT on "dynamic data-flow" meaning that it doesn't require
> moving out instructions that are already deep in the maelstrom of the OoO core. Of course, like all speculation,
> the stats are occasionally wrong, but they're correct ENOUGH of the time that this appears to be a big win.
> In particular it means that for most code most of the time, you just need an issue pool large enough to
> handle the small-scale re-ordering that I described above (miss to L2 for example) and to generate the "usual"
> amount of MLP that can be generated, which removes much of the cost of issue. Clustering (and, again statistics!,
> cluster steering predictors) help remove much of the rest of the cost.
>
> So where does this leave us?
> Two nasties that I have NOT covered are load queue and store queue. Those remain horribly expensive.
> ARM does a great job of simplifying this to some extent through the load-pair/store pair mechanism. Essentially
> what one would like is ways to say something like "this load/store doesn't interact with anything else
> that you, the core, need to care about". That's clearly tough to specify in any sort of useful way, for
> either the compiler or in the instruction set. Load/store pair helps insofar as it creates a larger unit
> to be consider thus reducing the number of cross-pairs that need to be considered. Vector loads/stores
> likewise help, for the same reason. One could imagine things like adding load/store triple and quadruple
> instructions (let's ignore other issues like bus widths or encoding for now) but would that buy us much?
> I've not seen numbers for how often non-vector runs of three or four successive same-sized objects are
> loaded or stores, but I suspect the win after pairs is pretty minimal.
>
> However, taking a hint from the paper I referenced above, what if we
> - maintained statistics for how often these pairs collided
> - based on these statistics steered the "apparently safe" loads/stores down a path that was SAFE (everything
> can be un-speculated if necessary) but optimistic in its assumption (all these guys never collided before,
> so we won't bother testing them again, we'll just do a final verification at commit)?
>
> This would allow us to similarly create the expensive (but no-longer so deep) standard load and
> store queues, and less expensive much simpler structures for the "expected safe" loads+stores.
> (I haven't really though this through, but I'm assuming that somehow we can arrange these structures
> in such a way that they can be slow but large --- eg n-way associative and banked rather than large
> CAMs because the hope is that most of the time, most loads/stores both don't interfere and are
> accurately predicted as not interfering, so that we can afford that all this cross-checking happens
> cycles after the actual generation of the load-data and having to replay is rare).
>
> So, what's the point of this long long exegesis?
> - To deal with the kind of code that I think most of us are interested in (the "general
> purpose code") I think you have to implement the things I've suggested
> + control speculation (and thus recovery mechanism)
> + superscalar (and thus DYNAMIC scheduling to make sure instructions don't tramp on each other)
> + MLP (which forces OoO)
>
> BUT there is still some under-utilized scope for reducing the expensive parts of the OoO+speculative
> complex through exploiting the way real code behaves. I've suggested this through the Long Term
> Parking paper, and through a hope that a similar idea could help with load/store queues.
>
> And so, to Mill. Unfortunately most of what Mill does doesn't seem to me especially relevant to everything
> I've laid out. Yeah, things like register rename and so on are a hassle, but if you believe deep control
> speculation is necessary, you have to have somewhere to hold all your temporary state anyway, and
> I'm not sure that minor details like the belt and so referencing by "three instructions down and two
> over" (with the hassle THAT generates when you go OoO --- which memory unpredictability forces on
> you anyway) are any better. It seems to me BOTH ways you're going to have to do dynamic renaming to
> deal with the dynamic uncertainties, and you're going to require a large pool of something to hold
> pending but uncommitted state. Likewise the crazy wide instruction fetch/issue, I just don't see it
> as being relevant to THIS world I've laid out. For the DSP world, maybe?
>
> Finally one final thing. The world I've described above tries to exploit a variety of correlations
> across program execution, and generally does so through a variety to local SRAMs that are recording
> those correlations. IF your goal is a latency engine, I don't see adding SMT to this as a useful
> addition. In the worst case you destroy many of the correlations. Even if you're smart enough to
> tag EVERYTHING with a threadID, you're basically halving (or worse) the available size of all these
> data structures. Which means that they're either no longer optimally sized, or you're paying extra
> power costs (which are sometimes quadratic) in the single-threaded case.
> I don't think this is a sensible ENGINEERING trade-off in a world where area doesn't matter but power-density
> does. Now certain legacy business models may view things differently, but that doesn't interest me; I expect
> engineering to prevail which means future business models will have to operate differently. You can see this
> already insofar as ARM doesn't think it's some sort of big deal to sell you eight (or ten...) cores rather than
> making a fuss about segmenting buyers into 2-core, 4-core, 6-core, 8-core camps. Likewise if you're selling parts
> whose selling point is that they are throughput engines, a different calculus applies. But I'm operating on the
> assumption that for future designs it makes more sense to have a FULLY optimized latency engine or two and a
> FULLY optimized throughput engine (what I suggested earlier as what I expect from Apple's "GPU") rather than
> trying to create something neither fish nor fowl that's only an adequate latency engine (but runs hotter than
> it needs to because its structures are larger than optimal in single-threaded mode) and only an adequate throughput
> engine (but runs slower than it needs to because its structures are too small in SMT mode).
>
> Yeah there's a lot here. And yeah, it's opinionated. And yeah, it's somewhat slanted to the needs of a company
> you may not care about, with zero concern for how these ideas might apply to x86 or any other company.
> But, jesus, isn't the plan of record that I've laid out --- disentangling OoO, MLP, ILP, and
> speculation, VASTLY more interesting than yet another argument about what RISC "really" is, and
> the merits or otherwise of implementing a CPU given the constraints of 180nm technology?
>
> As Ireland says, over and out.

Yeah, that was a long post.

Just to be clear with the simpler idea I was trying to get across, a micro thread of three stack ops dispatched to a ALU does not generate three results that need to be renamed like x86/RISC, you get one result to rename, or none in many cases as the result may be used by a branch.

With a quarter of the rename needs the rename limit goes away, transistor and power loss is reduced, etc.

But this requires a new instruction set, which is far less wasteful with less bogus state to track. There are lots of different ways to do this, if you stay RISC you can split your register file four ways kind of like the 68000. I also looked at a 64bit 6502 like zero page approach, but that was more for a GPU like engine.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsAnon2017/04/03 01:21 AM
  Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsMichael S2017/04/03 01:40 AM
    MIPSAnon2017/04/03 01:48 AM
      Microprocessor WITH interlocked Pipeline Stages, please rest in peace!Heikki Kultala2017/04/03 03:59 AM
        Microprocessor WITH interlocked Pipeline Stages, please rest in peace!RichardC2017/04/03 07:17 AM
          RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/03 05:49 PM
            RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/03 06:12 PM
              RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/03 11:40 PM
            RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds2017/04/03 06:25 PM
              RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/03 06:45 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/03 08:37 PM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/04 12:00 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/04 01:23 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/04 01:51 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/04 04:17 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/04 06:39 AM
                RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/04 06:02 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/04 07:05 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/04 08:06 AM
                      Try not to aim for one point on the curve!David Kanter2017/04/05 10:15 PM
                        Try not to aim for one point on the curve!RichardC2017/04/06 04:11 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Michael S2017/04/06 06:17 AM
                            Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Ireland2017/04/06 10:16 AM
                            Try not to aim for one point on the curve!RichardC2017/04/06 10:25 AM
                              Influence of Palm and Blackberry on Smaller DevicesIreland2017/04/06 10:45 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Ireland2017/04/06 10:11 AM
                          RISC not needed for smartphones and tabletsHeikki Kultala2017/04/06 10:39 PM
                        Try not to aim for one point on the curve!coppice2017/04/07 03:52 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Michael_S2017/04/07 04:41 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/04 07:55 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 08:59 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/05 03:53 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/05 09:25 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/06 02:36 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/06 09:36 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/07 07:05 AM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/08 12:02 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/08 04:45 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/08 08:39 AM
                                  (disappointing) Mill progressUngo2017/04/08 01:07 PM
                                    (disappointing) Mill progressMichael S2017/04/08 01:36 PM
                                      (disappointing) Mill progresswumpus2017/04/08 06:44 PM
                                      I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSP (NT)Heikki Kultala2017/04/08 10:16 PM
                                        I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPCoppice2017/04/08 10:40 PM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPCoppice2017/04/08 11:32 PM
                                            I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPwumpus2017/04/09 09:41 AM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPHeikki Kultala2017/04/09 09:49 PM
                                        I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPMichael S2017/04/09 03:15 AM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPanon2017/04/09 07:01 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/09 12:16 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/09 09:30 AM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/09 10:04 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/09 11:06 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/09 10:53 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionDoug S2017/04/10 02:03 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael_S2017/04/11 10:14 AM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/10 12:01 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/10 02:11 AM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionDoug S2017/04/11 03:31 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionBrett2017/04/11 10:06 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/12 04:49 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto2017/04/09 01:55 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMegol2017/04/10 10:42 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto2017/04/10 02:12 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionMegol2017/04/11 12:23 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto2017/04/11 01:49 PM
                                          The Mill is not dataflowPaul A. Clayton2017/04/12 04:43 AM
                                            The Mill is not dataflowAdrian2017/04/12 11:21 AM
                                              Name rather than address for Mill pick-up loads?Paul A. Clayton2017/04/12 07:35 PM
                                                Name rather than address for Mill pick-up loads?Adrian2017/04/12 11:51 PM
                                                  Fractional bits for instruction encodingook2017/04/13 01:56 AM
                                                    Fractional bits have been used for RegID encoding (NT)Paul A. Clayton2017/04/13 04:04 AM
                                                    Fractional bits for instruction encodingMegol2017/04/13 05:21 AM
                                                      fractional bitsRichardC2017/04/13 06:20 AM
                                                        fractional bitsMegol2017/04/15 06:22 AM
                                                          fractional bitsRichardC2017/04/15 10:58 AM
                                                            fractional bitsAdrian2017/04/16 04:08 AM
                                                              fractional bitsdmcq2017/04/16 05:04 AM
                                                              fractional bitsMichael_S2017/04/16 05:27 AM
                                                                The Mill spills load buffers on function callsPaul A. Clayton2017/04/16 12:44 PM
                                                                  The Mill spills load buffers on function callsRichardC2017/04/16 02:36 PM
                                                                    A specialized cache for spillsPaul A. Clayton2017/04/16 04:52 PM
                                                                      A specialized cache for spillsRichardC2017/04/17 01:16 AM
                                                                        The cycle-predictable domainRichardC2017/04/17 08:29 AM
                                                                          The cycle-predictable domainMichael S2017/04/17 02:35 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainRichardC2017/04/17 03:01 PM
                                                                              The cycle-predictable domainMichael S2017/04/17 03:37 PM
                                                                                The cycle-predictable domainRichardC2017/04/17 05:25 PM
                                                                                  The cycle-predictable domainRichardC2017/04/20 09:10 AM
                                                                                    The cycle-predictable domainMichael S2017/04/21 05:15 AM
                                                                                      sgemm detailsRichardC2017/04/21 06:09 AM
                                                                                        sgemm detailsRichardC2017/04/21 09:45 AM
                                                                                          sgemm detailsRichardC2017/04/21 11:27 AM
                                                                                            sgemm detailsMichael S2017/04/22 10:43 AM
                                                                                              sgemm detailsRichardC2017/04/23 06:18 AM
                                                                                                sgemm detailsanon2017/04/23 06:51 AM
                                                                                                  sgemm detailsMichael S2017/04/23 06:59 AM
                                                                                                    sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/25 08:26 PM
                                                                                                      sgemm detailsMichael S2017/04/26 01:10 AM
                                                                                                        sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/26 12:33 PM
                                                                                                          sgemm detailsMichael S2017/04/26 01:37 PM
                                                                                                            sgemm detailsanon2017/04/27 09:17 AM
                                                                                                      sgemm detailsanon2017/04/26 11:35 AM
                                                                                                        sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/26 01:00 PM
                                                                                                          sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/26 01:50 PM
                                                                                                            sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/26 01:55 PM
                                                                                                        sgemm detailsTravis2017/04/26 01:58 PM
                                                                                                          sgemm detailsanon2017/04/26 02:20 PM
                                                                                                sgemm detailsMichael S2017/04/23 06:55 AM
                                                                                        Mill "registers"Michael S2017/04/22 11:45 AM
                                                                          The cycle-predictable domainJacob Marley2017/04/17 09:28 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainJacob Marley2017/04/17 09:28 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainMaynard Handley2017/04/17 10:00 PM
                                                                            OoO window and cachesRichardC2017/04/18 06:53 AM
                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/18 02:48 PM
                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Megol2017/04/18 03:24 PM
                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/18 04:46 PM
                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003Megol2017/04/19 10:02 AM
                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/19 01:22 PM
                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/20 06:35 AM
                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/20 09:39 AM
                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/20 12:15 PM
                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/20 01:10 PM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/20 03:27 PM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/20 07:33 PM
                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/21 03:35 AM
                                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/21 05:25 AM
                                                                                                    DenverRichardC2017/04/21 05:54 AM
                                                                                                      Denverdmcq2017/04/22 04:57 AM
                                                                                                        DenverMichael S2017/04/22 11:58 AM
                                                                                                          Denverdmcq2017/04/22 12:57 PM
                                                                                                            DenverRichardC2017/04/22 02:41 PM
                                                                                                              Denverdmcq2017/04/22 03:35 PM
                                                                                                                Denverdmcq2017/04/22 03:41 PM
                                                                                                                  loopsRichardC2017/04/23 06:03 AM
                                                                                                                    loopsanon2017/04/23 06:35 AM
                                                                                                                      loopsRichardC2017/04/25 06:41 PM
                                                                                                                        loopsanon2017/04/26 05:08 AM
                                                                                                                          loopsBrett2017/04/26 01:27 PM
                                                                                                                            loopsanon2017/04/26 02:16 PM
                                                                                                                              loopsBrett2017/04/27 01:11 AM
                                                                                                            DenverMichael S2017/04/22 03:41 PM
                                                                                                              Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesPaul A. Clayton2017/04/24 11:52 AM
                                                                                                                Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesRichardC2017/04/25 06:50 PM
                                                                                                                  Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesMegol2017/04/26 04:58 AM
                                                                                                                  Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesanon2017/04/26 05:18 AM
                                                                                                                    Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesRichardC2017/04/26 01:22 PM
                                                                                                                      Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesBrett2017/04/26 01:38 PM
                                                                                                                        Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesMichael S2017/04/26 02:13 PM
                                                                                                                        Phasing *is* similar to classic skewed pipelinesRichardC2017/04/26 04:19 PM
                                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/21 07:55 AM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/21 08:56 AM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/21 11:46 AM
                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/21 02:13 PM
                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/21 02:21 PM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003none2017/04/21 09:03 AM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003NoSpammer2017/04/21 12:40 PM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/21 01:19 PM
                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/06 03:16 PM
                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/06 04:41 PM
                                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus2017/05/06 07:05 PM
                                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/07 01:56 PM
                                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/07 05:47 PM
                                                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/07 08:57 PM
                                                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/08 01:39 AM
                                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/08 02:38 AM
                                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/08 03:15 AM
                                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus2017/05/08 07:53 AM
                                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/08 11:34 PM
                                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/09 06:53 AM
                                                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/10 09:34 PM
                                                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/11 10:28 AM
                                                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/11 10:31 AM
                                                                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/11 02:46 PM
                                                                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/11 10:12 PM
                                                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/12 10:06 AM
                                                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/14 07:42 PM
                                                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/15 08:51 AM
                                                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Brett2017/05/15 09:56 AM
                                                                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/05/15 12:50 PM
                                                                                                                                            Mill static schedulingPaul A. Clayton2017/05/15 12:00 PM
                                                                                                                                          integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumHeikki Kultala2017/05/15 12:24 PM
                                                                                                                                            integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumRichardC2017/05/15 02:38 PM
                                                                                                                                              stalling after variable latency instruction in millHeikki Kultala2017/05/15 09:56 PM
                                                                                                                                                stalling after variable latency instruction in millanon2017/05/16 01:31 AM
                                                                                                                                                stalling after variable latency instruction in millMichael S2017/05/16 01:34 AM
                                                                                                                                                stalling after variable latency instruction in millRichardC2017/05/16 09:19 AM
                                                                                                                                            integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumBrett2017/05/15 10:23 PM
                                                                                                                                              integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumHeikki Kultala2017/05/16 12:10 AM
                                                                                                                                                integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumBrett2017/05/17 10:56 AM
                                                                                                                                              integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumanon2017/05/16 01:44 AM
                                                                                                                                                integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumBrett2017/05/16 11:37 PM
                                                                                                                                                  integer multiplication latence, welcome to this millenniumBrett2017/05/20 05:23 PM
                                                                                                                                              fast multiplier sizeHeikki Kultala2017/05/16 04:43 AM
                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley2017/05/06 08:16 PM
                                                                                                              the dataflow graphRichardC2017/05/08 05:59 PM
                                                                                                                the dataflow graphJacob Marley2017/05/08 09:49 PM
                                                                                                                  the dataflow graphRichardC2017/05/09 04:28 AM
                                                                                                                    the dataflow graphJacob Marley2017/05/14 03:12 AM
                                                                                                                dataflow languages?j2017/05/09 02:58 AM
                                                                                                                  dataflow languages?anon.12017/05/10 08:09 AM
                                                                                                                    dataflow languages?j2017/05/12 05:00 AM
                                                                                                                      dataflow languages?RichardC2017/05/12 03:02 PM
                                                                                                                        dataflow languages? (R in particular)wumpus2017/05/14 09:50 AM
                                                                                                                          R/Python dynamic workload is Fortran-like ?RichardC2017/05/14 05:59 PM
                                                                                                                          dataflow languages? (R in particular)slacker2017/05/14 09:52 PM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003Megol2017/04/22 04:42 AM
                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC2017/04/22 11:07 AM
                                                                                              Actually, Mill scratchpad is more like 1 cycleHenry S2017/04/21 02:27 PM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley2017/04/20 10:14 PM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley2017/04/20 10:14 PM
                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley2017/04/20 10:15 PM
                                                                                              OoOE processor and virtual function callsHeikki kultala2017/04/20 10:59 PM
                                                                                                OoOE processor and virtual function callsJacob Marley2017/04/21 01:12 AM
                                                                                                  OoOE processor and virtual function callsMichael_S2017/04/21 03:04 AM
                                                                                                OoOE processor and virtual function callsRichardC2017/04/21 06:26 AM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Michael_S2017/04/21 03:37 AM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Gabriele Svelto2017/04/22 03:17 PM
                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOPaul A. Clayton2017/04/24 10:55 AM
                                                                                            Glew thoughts on OoO vs tradittional Runahead vs improved Runaheadjuanrga2017/04/25 10:58 AM
                                                                                              Glew thoughts on OoO vs tradittional Runahead vs improved RunaheadPaul A. Clayton2017/04/26 06:32 PM
                                                                                                Glew thoughts on OoO vs tradittional Runahead vs improved Runaheadjuanrga2017/04/28 05:06 AM
                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/25 03:06 PM
                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/25 05:11 PM
                                                                                                How ARM Cortex-A53 fits in the picture? (NT)Michael S2017/04/26 12:40 AM
                                                                                                I think you put your finger on itHenry S2017/04/26 02:16 AM
                                                                                                  I think you put your finger on itJacob Marley2017/04/27 12:02 AM
                                                                                                    I think you put your finger on itHenry S2017/04/27 07:29 PM
                                                                                                      I think you put your finger on itJacob Marley2017/04/29 06:17 PM
                                                                                                      A Mill-specific weakness?Paul A. Clayton2017/04/29 06:41 PM
                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOEtienne2017/04/26 02:53 AM
                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/04/26 03:29 AM
                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOdmcq2017/04/26 04:52 AM
                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/26 06:20 AM
                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOnobody in particular2017/04/26 06:45 AM
                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/26 07:07 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/26 07:32 AM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/26 08:21 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOnobody in particular2017/04/26 05:53 PM
                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/26 11:44 AM
                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/26 11:56 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/26 02:26 PM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 02:30 AM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/27 11:04 AM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 11:26 AM
                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/27 12:17 PM
                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 12:28 PM
                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/27 01:07 PM
                                                                                                                    Flying Scotsman Ireland2017/04/27 01:56 PM
                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 02:39 PM
                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/27 03:18 PM
                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/27 03:37 PM
                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 04:03 PM
                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/27 04:54 PM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/27 05:36 PM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOrwessel2017/04/27 06:01 PM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOdmcq2017/04/28 04:19 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/28 07:37 AM
                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/28 08:26 AM
                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOBrett2017/04/28 10:17 AM
                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/28 11:58 AM
                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/28 01:27 PM
                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/28 07:39 PM
                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOJukka Larja2017/04/28 09:03 PM
                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOrwessel2017/04/28 10:10 PM
                                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOJukka Larja2017/04/29 04:30 AM
                                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOgallier22017/05/08 01:49 AM
                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/28 10:14 PM
                                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOJukka Larja2017/04/29 04:27 AM
                                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/29 10:03 AM
                                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/29 06:57 PM
                                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/29 09:28 PM
                                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/30 08:46 AM
                                                                                                                                                    Methods for exchange of data Ireland2017/04/30 08:59 AM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/27 08:40 PM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/04/28 01:58 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/28 07:38 AM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/28 10:12 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOdmcq2017/04/28 11:31 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/04/28 05:16 PM
                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOdmcq2017/04/29 08:30 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/28 07:29 PM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOSeni2017/04/29 05:36 AM
                                                                                                                                  Critical misunderstandings@2017/04/29 09:42 AM
                                                                                                                                    Critical misunderstandingsMegol2017/04/29 02:18 PM
                                                                                                                                      Critical misunderstandingsExophase2017/04/29 09:22 PM
                                                                                                                                        Critical misunderstandingsMaynard Handley2017/04/29 10:01 PM
                                                                                                                                      Critical misunderstandings@2017/04/30 06:03 AM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/04/28 01:46 AM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/28 02:40 AM
                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/27 03:39 PM
                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 04:10 PM
                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/27 04:57 PM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/27 05:00 PM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/28 02:06 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/28 05:42 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/28 10:15 AM
                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/28 06:05 PM
                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/04/27 04:56 PM
                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/27 05:57 PM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOEtienne2017/04/28 01:56 AM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/04/28 03:24 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/28 03:40 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOEtienne2017/04/28 05:29 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/04/29 02:12 PM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/04/28 05:57 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/04/28 02:25 PM
                                                                                                                                    Moar cores and A53Heikki kultala2017/04/29 11:03 AM
                                                                                                                                Bad comparison points of A53 and A72.Heikki kultala2017/04/29 11:01 AM
                                                                                                                                  Bad comparison points of A53 and A72.juanrga2017/04/30 05:02 AM
                                                                                                                                    Bad comparison points of A53 and A72.anon22017/04/30 05:31 AM
                                                                                                                                      Did AAPL ever confirmed that Zephyr is OoO ? (NT)Michael S2017/04/30 07:26 AM
                                                                                                                                        Did AAPL ever confirmed that Zephyr is OoO ?Maynard Handley2017/04/30 10:08 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOHeikki kultala2017/04/29 11:17 AM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/29 12:51 PM
                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/04/30 12:28 PM
                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoODavid Hess2017/04/30 01:14 PM
                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/05/01 04:42 AM
                                                                                                                                         anon22017/05/01 05:59 AM
                                                                                                                                          Posted without topic (was Glew quote about amount of OoO)anon22017/05/01 06:01 AM
                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoODavid Hess2017/05/01 09:36 AM
                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOHeikki kultala2017/05/01 08:27 PM
                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOWilco2017/05/02 01:29 AM
                                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon22017/05/02 01:57 AM
                                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael_S2017/05/02 06:24 AM
                                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/05/02 11:07 AM
                                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/05/02 11:32 AM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/05/02 11:53 AM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/05/02 12:05 PM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOdmcq2017/05/04 08:04 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/05/04 11:00 AM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOAdrian2017/05/04 10:50 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/05/04 11:04 AM
                                                                                                                                                        You're not alone!iz2017/05/04 02:05 PM
                                                                                                                                                          You're not alone!GTR2017/05/09 03:21 PM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/05/02 12:52 PM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoODoug S2017/05/02 03:13 PM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/05/02 05:08 PM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOslacker2017/05/02 11:06 PM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOBrett2017/05/03 12:14 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOanonymouse2017/05/05 06:02 AM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/05/03 12:24 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Rigorous dataslacker2017/05/03 02:03 AM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOSymmetry2017/05/03 05:38 AM
                                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOslacker2017/05/02 06:00 PM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/05/02 07:08 PM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOslacker2017/05/02 11:20 PM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOSymmetry2017/05/03 05:53 AM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/05/05 12:42 AM
                                                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOjuanrga2017/05/03 02:32 AM
                                                                                                                                                    Latency versus Efficiency Ireland2017/05/03 03:44 AM
                                                                                                                                                      Latency versus Efficiency Ireland2017/05/03 03:49 AM
                                                                                                                                                      Latency versus Efficiency juanrga2017/05/06 03:57 AM
                                                                                                                                                        Latency versus Efficiency Linus B Torvalds2017/05/06 10:55 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Latency versus Efficiency Ireland2017/05/06 11:37 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Efficiency != Throughput (NT)juanrga2017/05/07 04:03 AM
                                                                                                                                                            Efficiency != ThroughputLinus B Torvalds2017/05/07 09:18 AM
                                                                                                                                                              Efficiency != ThroughputAdrian2017/05/07 11:10 AM
                                                                                                                                                                Efficiency != Throughputanon2017/05/07 05:04 PM
                                                                                                                                                                  Efficiency != ThroughputJacob Marley2017/05/07 06:48 PM
                                                                                                                                                                  Efficiency != ThroughputAnne O. Nymous2017/05/08 03:25 AM
                                                                                                                                                                    Crocodiliaslacker2017/05/08 03:39 AM
                                                                                                                                                                      Crocodiliaanon2017/05/08 03:59 AM
                                                                                                                                                                  Efficiency != ThroughputLinus B Torvalds2017/05/08 11:17 AM
                                                                                                                                                                    Efficiency != ThroughputIreland2017/05/08 01:44 PM
                                                                                                                                                                    Efficiency != ThroughputDomaldel2017/05/08 11:30 PM
                                                                                                                                                              Efficiency != ThroughputIreland2017/05/07 12:28 PM
                                                                                                                                                                Efficiency != ThroughputDomaldel2017/05/08 11:35 PM
                                                                                                                                                              Efficiency != ThroughputDomaldel2017/05/08 11:19 PM
                                                                                                                                                                Efficiency != ThroughputLinus B Torvalds2017/05/09 09:47 AM
                                                                                                                                                                  Efficiency != ThroughputIreland2017/05/09 12:22 PM
                                                                                                                                                                  analogyMichael S2017/05/10 05:05 AM
                                                                                                                                                                    analogyIreland2017/05/10 06:25 AM
                                                                                                                                                              It is not "high-performance vs low-performance"juanrga2017/05/09 03:37 AM
                                                                                                                                                                It is not "high-performance vs low-performance"anon2017/05/09 05:51 PM
                                                                                                                                                                  It is not "high-performance vs low-performance"juanrga2017/05/12 06:57 PM
                                                                                                                                                                It is not "high-performance vs low-performance"Anon2017/05/10 07:25 AM
                                                                                                                                                                It IS "high-performance vs low-performance"Heikki Kultala2017/05/10 09:20 PM
                                                                                                                                                        Latency versus Efficiency Symmetry2017/05/08 06:40 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Latency versus Efficiency Gabriele Svelto2017/05/08 08:56 AM
                                                                                                                                                          Latency versus Efficiency juanrga2017/05/09 02:29 AM
                                                                                                                                                            Latency versus Efficiency GTR2017/05/09 03:17 PM
                                                                                                                                                              Latency versus Efficiency anon2017/05/09 03:46 PM
                                                                                                                                                              Latency versus Efficiency Maynard Handley2017/05/09 05:15 PM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOanonymouse2017/05/05 04:17 PM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOjuanrga2017/05/06 03:57 AM
                                                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOEtienne2017/05/08 01:57 AM
                                                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/05/08 06:21 AM
                                                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOGTR2017/05/09 03:09 PM
                                                                                                                                            your 3x is total bullshitHeikki kultala2017/05/02 01:30 PM
                                                                                                                                              your 3x is total bullshitWilco2017/05/02 02:58 PM
                                                                                                                                                your 3x is total bullshitMichael S2017/05/02 03:58 PM
                                                                                                                                                  your 3x is total bullshitWilco2017/05/03 03:13 AM
                                                                                                                                                    your 3x is total bullshitMichael S2017/05/03 04:43 AM
                                                                                                                                                    your 3x is total bullshitMichael S2017/05/03 06:15 AM
                                                                                                                                                      your 3x is total bullshitWilco2017/05/03 02:31 PM
                                                                                                                                                        your 3x is total bullshitMichael S2017/05/04 07:56 AM
                                                                                                                                                          your 3x is total bullshitLinus B Torvalds2017/05/04 10:46 AM
                                                                                                                                                your 3x is total bullshitMaynard Handley2017/05/02 05:19 PM
                                                                                                                                                your 3x is total bullshitHeikki kultala2017/05/02 10:57 PM
                                                                                                                                                your 3x is total bullshitGabriele Svelto2017/05/05 06:32 AM
                                                                                                                                                  your 3x is total bullshitjuanrga2017/05/06 03:45 AM
                                                                                                                                                    your 3x is total bullshitGabriele Svelto2017/05/08 06:12 AM
                                                                                                                                            Or, alternatively, your 65% is bullshit.Heikki kultala2017/05/02 01:37 PM
                                                                                                                                              Or, alternatively, your 65% is bullshit.Wilco2017/05/02 03:39 PM
                                                                                                                                            Going from 2-wide in-order to 2-wide OoOE benchmarks..Heikki kultala2017/05/02 01:42 PM
                                                                                                                                              Going from 2-wide in-order to 2-wide OoOE benchmarks..Megol2017/05/13 01:26 PM
                                                                                                                                                Going from 2-wide in-order to 2-wide OoOE benchmarks..Michael S2017/05/13 02:14 PM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/04/28 05:12 AM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/04/28 05:25 AM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus Torvalds2017/04/28 09:47 AM
                                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOEtienne2017/05/02 08:36 AM
                                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/28 02:02 AM
                                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/28 07:54 PM
                                                                                                                              3-wide in-orderMichael S2017/05/02 03:51 AM
                                                                                                                                3-wide in-orderwumpus2017/05/03 07:24 AM
                                                                                                                                  Merced is actually 6-way core (NT)Michael S2017/05/03 11:35 AM
                                                                                                                                    only on a really good daysomeone2017/05/04 08:11 AM
                                                                                                                            It's the memory! stupid.gallier22017/04/28 08:56 AM
                                                                                                                              Merced is actually 6-way core (NT)Michael S2017/05/03 07:47 AM
                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOMr. Camel2017/04/28 01:55 PM
                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/04/28 03:00 PM
                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/04/29 01:58 PM
                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/29 02:38 PM
                                                                                                                    P4 part is complete bullshit (NT)Michael S2017/04/29 03:04 PM
                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOMr. Camel2017/04/29 03:22 PM
                                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOLinus B Torvalds2017/04/29 03:46 PM
                                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/29 04:06 PM
                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOAnil Maliyekkel2017/04/29 05:04 PM
                                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOGabriele Svelto2017/04/30 06:59 AM
                                                                                                                    License-optimized core designsGTR2017/05/09 02:18 PM
                                                                                                                      License-optimized core designsSimon Farnsworth2017/05/10 02:33 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOanon.12017/04/26 11:15 PM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 01:14 AM
                                                                                                          Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixMichael S2017/04/27 02:02 AM
                                                                                                            Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixMichael S2017/04/27 02:04 AM
                                                                                                              Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixanon2017/04/27 02:49 AM
                                                                                                                Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixMichael S2017/04/27 04:41 AM
                                                                                                                  Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixanon2017/04/27 05:15 AM
                                                                                                                    Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixMichael S2017/04/27 06:10 AM
                                                                                                                      Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks on phoronixanon2017/04/27 07:02 AM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/27 07:48 AM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 09:49 AM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon.12017/04/27 10:47 PM
                                                                                                              Glew quote about amount of OoOwumpus2017/04/28 07:49 AM
                                                                                                                Glew quote about amount of OoOHeikki kultala2017/04/30 01:13 AM
                                                                                                                  Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/30 03:27 AM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOanon.12017/04/27 08:16 AM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOanon2017/04/27 09:44 AM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOSymmetry2017/04/27 10:48 AM
                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/26 04:55 PM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/26 05:16 PM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/26 05:41 PM
                                                                                                    Glew quote about amount of OoOjuanrga2017/04/28 05:22 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoOHeikki kultala2017/04/29 09:14 AM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOjuanrga2017/04/30 04:44 AM
                                                                                                      Glew quote about amount of OoODavid Hess2017/04/30 01:28 PM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/30 04:15 PM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/04/30 04:31 PM
                                                                                                        Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/04/30 04:50 PM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOIreland2017/05/01 10:21 AM
                                                                                                          Glew quote about amount of OoOMaynard Handley2017/05/01 01:54 PM
                                                                                                            Glew quote about amount of OoOMichael S2017/05/01 02:15 PM
                                                                                        Mill is optimized for frequent callsHenry S2017/04/21 02:27 AM
                                                                                          spillerRichardC2017/04/21 07:53 AM
                                                                                            spiller documentationRichardC2017/04/21 08:04 AM
                                                                                            spillerSymmetry2017/04/21 08:47 AM
                                                                                              spillerSymmetry2017/04/21 08:51 AM
                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus2017/04/21 07:59 AM
                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus2017/04/20 07:58 AM
                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003anon2017/04/18 08:02 PM
                                                                          virtual method callsRichardC2017/04/19 08:50 AM
                                                                fractional bitsrwessel2017/04/17 02:14 AM
                                                                  fractional bitsMichael S2017/04/17 12:50 PM
                                                                    fractional bitsEugene Nalimov2017/04/17 08:25 PM
                                                              fractional bitsMegol2017/04/16 03:05 PM
                                                                fractional bitsdmcq2017/04/17 03:04 AM
                                                                  fractional bitsGabriele Svelto2017/04/17 10:09 AM
                                                                    fractional bitsMaynard Handley2017/04/17 11:53 AM
                                                                      fractional bitsanon2017/04/17 02:29 PM
                                                                      fractional bitsanon.12017/04/23 02:44 PM
                                                                        fractional bitsMaynard Handley2017/04/23 03:19 PM
                                                                          fractional bitsanon.12017/04/23 11:09 PM
                                                                            fractional bitsMaynard Handley2017/04/24 01:07 AM
                                                                Excellent exampleHenry S2017/04/21 02:02 PM
                                                                  Excellent exampleanon.12017/04/23 01:50 PM
                                                                    I don't think that's the issueHenry S2017/04/25 10:22 AM
                                                                      I don't think that's the issueanon.12017/04/25 08:45 PM
                                                                        I don't think that's the issueMaynard Handley2017/04/25 10:59 PM
                                                                          I don't think that's the issueanon.12017/04/26 10:47 PM
                                                                            I don't think that's the issueMaynard Handley2017/04/27 10:59 AM
                                                                              I don't think that's the issueanon.12017/04/27 10:32 PM
                                                                                I don't think that's the issueMaynard Handley2017/04/27 11:24 PM
                                                                                  I don't think that's the issueanon.12017/04/28 07:51 AM
                                                                                    I don't think that's the issueanon.12017/04/28 08:20 AM
                                                                                Hierarchical and distributedPaul A. Clayton2017/04/30 06:54 PM
                                                                                  Hierarchical and distributedanon.12017/05/01 10:25 AM
                                                                                    Hierarchical and distributedMaynard Handley2017/05/01 02:07 PM
                                                              fractional bitsanon2017/04/16 05:31 PM
                                                                OoO instruction windowPaul A. Clayton2017/04/17 06:43 PM
                                                                  OoO instruction windowanon2017/04/17 07:57 PM
                                                                    OoO instruction windowMaynard Handley2017/04/17 10:16 PM
                                                                      OoO instruction windowanon2017/04/18 02:51 AM
                                                                        OoO instruction windowwumpus2017/04/19 07:16 AM
                                                                    Initiating post-return loads earlyPaul A. Clayton2017/04/18 08:39 AM
                                                                      Initiating post-return loads earlyanon2017/04/18 06:28 PM
                                                                        Software assisted prefetchingPaul A. Clayton2017/04/18 08:13 PM
                                                                          Software assisted prefetchingMaynard Handley2017/04/18 10:04 PM
                                                                            Software assisted prefetchingMichael S2017/04/19 01:49 AM
                                                              fractional bitsUngo2017/04/17 08:03 PM
                                                            fractional bitsMegol2017/04/16 02:33 PM
                                                              fractional bitsRichardC2017/04/16 02:43 PM
                                                          fractional bitsBrett2017/04/15 12:48 PM
                                                            RISC warsMichael S2017/04/15 01:04 PM
                                                              RISC warsBrett2017/04/15 04:18 PM
                                                                RISC warsdmcq2017/04/16 04:36 AM
                                                                  RISC warsBrett2017/04/16 03:02 PM
                                                                    RISC warsMaynard Handley2017/04/16 05:48 PM
                                                                      RISC warsBrett2017/04/16 07:56 PM
                                                                        RISC warsMaynard Handley2017/04/16 09:45 PM
                                                                          RISC warsBrett2017/04/17 01:51 AM
                                                                      RISC warsSimon Farnsworth2017/04/17 05:51 AM
                                                                        RISC warsdmcq2017/04/17 06:24 AM
                                                                          RISC warsBrett2017/04/22 02:36 PM
                                                                            RISC warsMaynard Handley2017/04/22 03:14 PM
                                                                              RISC warsBrett2017/04/22 05:54 PM
                                                                                RISC warsMaynard Handley2017/04/22 09:17 PM
                                                                                  POWER8 - frequency, rename widthMichael S2017/04/23 01:47 AM
                                                                                    POWER8 - frequency, rename widthdmcq2017/04/23 10:01 AM
                                                                                    POWER8 - frequency, rename widthrwessel2017/04/23 10:10 AM
                                                                                      POWER8 - frequency, rename widthMaynard Handley2017/04/23 11:11 AM
                                                                                      POWER8 - frequency, rename widthTravis2017/04/23 03:31 PM
                                                                                    POWER8 - frequency, rename widthMaynard Handley2017/04/23 10:25 AM
                                                                                      POWER8 - frequency, rename widthMaynard Handley2017/04/23 11:30 AM
                                                                                        POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/23 12:47 PM
                                                                                          POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2Travis2017/04/23 03:42 PM
                                                                                            exactly (NT)Michael S2017/04/23 04:33 PM
                                                                                            POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/23 04:44 PM
                                                                                              Alpha 21264 (duplicated GPRs) was utter insane?! (I think not) (NT)Paul A. Clayton2017/04/23 06:58 PM
                                                                                                done for different reasonsanon2017/04/24 01:00 AM
                                                                                                  Additive clustering/replication advantages?Paul A. Clayton2017/04/24 09:34 AM
                                                                                                    Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/25 05:43 PM
                                                                                                      Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/26 05:17 AM
                                                                                                        Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/26 06:13 AM
                                                                                                          Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/26 06:00 PM
                                                                                                            Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/27 04:08 AM
                                                                                                              Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/27 05:57 AM
                                                                                                                Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/27 08:05 AM
                                                                                                                  Additive clustering/replication advantages?Michael S2017/04/27 08:09 AM
                                                                                                                    Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/27 09:21 AM
                                                                                                                  Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/27 10:07 AM
                                                                                                                    Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/27 11:54 AM
                                                                                                                      Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/27 01:05 PM
                                                                                                                        Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/27 02:52 PM
                                                                                                                          Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/27 03:28 PM
                                                                                                                            Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon2017/04/28 05:14 AM
                                                                                                                              Additive clustering/replication advantages?anon22017/04/29 07:23 PM
                                                                                              POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/23 10:12 PM
                                                                                                POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/24 01:04 AM
                                                                                                  POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/24 02:26 AM
                                                                                                    schizoMichael S2017/04/24 03:02 AM
                                                                                                      no (NT)anon2017/04/24 03:10 AM
                                                                                                POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2Brett2017/04/24 09:55 PM
                                                                                                  POWER8 is 2x(3+1), not 6+2anon2017/04/25 12:49 AM
                                                                                    incorrect POWER6 infoThu Nguyen2017/04/24 11:39 PM
                                                                                      incorrect POWER6 infoMichael S2017/04/25 12:59 AM
                                                                                  RISC warsBrett2017/04/23 04:35 PM
                                                                                    RISC warsBrett2017/04/24 01:25 AM
                                                                                      RISC warsBrett2017/04/24 10:33 PM
                                                                                  RISC warsanon2017/04/23 06:51 PM
                                                                                  Instruction Grouping is gone with POWER9Mark Roulo2017/04/24 04:39 PM
                                                                                RISC warsMichael S2017/04/23 02:25 AM
                                                                                RISC warsdmcq2017/04/25 09:06 AM
                                                                    RISC warsdmcq2017/04/17 02:55 AM
                                                            Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/23 07:52 PM
                                                              Chains of single opcodes are stupidwumpus2017/04/25 07:48 AM
                                                                Chains of single opcodes are stupidHeikki kultala2017/04/26 01:42 AM
                                                                  Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/05/06 12:36 AM
                                                                    Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/05/07 12:29 AM
                                                                      What 24-bit branches are you talking about?Heikki Kultala2017/05/07 09:44 PM
                                                                        What 24-bit branches are you talking about?Brett2017/05/08 02:48 AM
                                                                          What 24-bit branches are you talking about?anon2017/05/08 11:24 AM
                                                                            What 24-bit branches are you talking about?Brett2017/05/09 11:33 PM
                                                                              What 24-bit branches are you talking about?anon2017/05/10 04:30 AM
                                                                                Branches and OS calls ...Mark Roulo2017/05/10 04:12 PM
                                                                                  Branches and OS calls ...Brett2017/05/10 08:40 PM
                                                                    Code densityHeikki Kultala2017/05/07 09:03 PM
                                                                      Code densityBrett2017/05/08 02:52 AM
                                                                Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/27 01:02 AM
                                                                  Chains of single opcodes are stupidwumpus2017/04/27 08:06 AM
                                                                    Chains of single opcodes are stupidanon2017/04/27 09:33 AM
                                                                    Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/27 11:57 AM
                                                                      Chains of single opcodes are stupidAdrian2017/04/27 12:21 PM
                                                                        Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/28 11:47 PM
                                                                          You sound like a fool (NT)anon22017/04/29 01:12 AM
                                                                            You sound like a foolBrett2017/04/29 02:20 AM
                                                                              You sound like a foolanon22017/04/29 04:03 AM
                                                                                You sound like a foolBrett2017/04/30 12:24 AM
                                                                                  You sound like a foolMichael S2017/04/30 01:36 AM
                                                                                    You sound like a foolBrett2017/04/30 03:56 PM
                                                                                      You sound like a foolMichael S2017/04/30 05:14 PM
                                                                                        You sound like a foolBrett2017/04/30 06:03 PM
                                                                                          Laptop CPUsanon22017/04/30 07:10 PM
                                                                          Chains of single opcodes are stupidAdrian2017/04/29 05:38 AM
                                                                      Chains of single opcodes are stupidanon2017/04/27 12:34 PM
                                                                        Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/28 12:35 AM
                                                                          8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessHeikki Kultala2017/04/28 06:45 AM
                                                                            8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessMichael S2017/04/28 07:10 AM
                                                                              8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessBrett2017/04/28 09:57 AM
                                                                                8088, 8086 and 16- and 20-bitnessHeikki kultala2017/04/28 11:56 AM
                                                                                  doubling momory capasity every 2 years I mean (NT)Heikki kultala2017/04/28 11:57 AM
                                                                                  8088, 8086 and 16- and 20-bitnessBrett2017/04/28 08:46 PM
                                                                                    8088, 8086 and 16- and 20-bitnessYuhong Bao2017/04/28 11:17 PM
                                                                                8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessrwessel2017/04/28 01:21 PM
                                                                              8088, 8086 and 16-bitnesswumpus2017/04/28 08:10 PM
                                                                                8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessanon22017/04/29 01:02 AM
                                                                                8088, 8086 and 16-bitnessSeni2017/04/29 05:59 AM
                                                                          Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/05/05 11:56 PM
                                                                            Chains of single opcodes are stupidwumpus2017/05/06 06:39 PM
                                                                    Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/28 11:32 PM
                                                                      patents, alpha etc.Heikki kultala2017/04/29 09:07 AM
                                                                        patents, alpha etc.wumpus2017/04/29 11:23 AM
                                                                          patents, alpha etc.Megol2017/05/10 08:27 AM
                                                                            patents, alpha etc.rwessel2017/05/10 12:09 PM
                                                                              patents, alpha etc.David Hess2017/05/10 07:18 PM
                                                                              patents, alpha etc.Heikki Kultala2017/05/10 11:59 PM
                                                                                patents, alpha etc.anonny mouse2017/05/11 01:30 AM
                                                                                  patents, alpha etc.Megol2017/05/11 05:49 AM
                                                                                    pipelining/OoOE and indirect addressing problemHeikki Kultala2017/05/11 07:42 AM
                                                                                      pipelining/OoOE and indirect addressing problemTEMLIB2017/05/11 12:18 PM
                                                                                    patents, alpha etc.rwessel2017/05/11 03:28 PM
                                                                                      patents, alpha etc.gallier22017/05/12 01:32 AM
                                                                            patents, alpha etc.TEMLIB2017/05/11 12:22 PM
                                                                              patents, alpha etc.Linus B Torvalds2017/05/12 09:25 AM
                                                                Chains of single opcodes are stupidBrett2017/04/30 12:49 AM
                                                                  programming language of the futureCarlie Coats2017/05/11 06:58 AM
                                                    Fractional bits for instruction encodingdmcq2017/04/13 06:35 AM
                                                      Sounds like a FP counter with random rounding (NT)Paul A. Clayton2017/04/13 07:08 PM
                                                        Sounds like a FP counter with random roundingdmcq2017/04/14 12:35 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionMegol2017/04/12 03:13 PM
                                            Mill load buffer and spillPaul A. Clayton2017/04/12 07:02 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/09 03:51 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/09 08:30 AM
                  ARM vs RISC religionHeikki Kultala2017/04/04 07:58 AM
                    religious vs atheist or SF Bay Area vs Rest of the World (NT)Michael S2017/04/04 08:25 AM
                    ARM vs RISC religionRichardC2017/04/04 08:44 AM
                      ARM vs RISC religionEtienne2017/04/04 09:22 AM
                        ARM vs RISC religionRichardC2017/04/04 09:39 AM
                          ARM vs RISC religionExophase2017/04/04 07:54 PM
                            that's a neat trick! (NT)RichardC2017/04/04 08:34 PM
                    ARM vs RISC religiondmcq2017/04/04 09:37 AM
                    ARM vs RISC religionwumpus2017/04/05 07:14 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 09:14 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 03:12 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 03:14 PM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds2017/04/04 11:10 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/04 11:24 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionExophase2017/04/04 10:05 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/05 01:58 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionExophase2017/04/05 11:07 AM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/05 03:38 PM
                          Load delay slot new value after cache missPaul A. Clayton2017/04/06 10:29 AM
                            Load delay slot new value after cache missExophase2017/04/06 03:05 PM
                      unspcified behaviour load delay slot pessimalityHeikki Kultala2017/04/04 11:14 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth2017/04/06 05:18 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/06 09:54 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth2017/04/06 11:51 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/06 03:55 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionEtienne2017/04/07 04:36 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/04 11:58 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 03:20 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 03:40 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/05 12:52 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/05 01:04 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiongallier22017/04/05 05:06 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/05 09:14 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth2017/04/05 11:01 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSeni2017/04/05 12:26 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess2017/04/05 11:36 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/06 12:32 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionExophase2017/04/06 03:07 PM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds2017/04/06 03:27 PM
                                  Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Mark Roulo2017/04/06 03:45 PM
                                    Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Linus Torvalds2017/04/06 04:25 PM
                                      Intel x86 registers to the rescue!John Yates2017/04/06 05:51 PM
                                      Intel x86 registers to the rescue!David Hess2017/04/08 06:49 AM
                                        Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Ireland2017/04/08 04:47 PM
                                          Intel x86 registers to the rescue!wumpus2017/04/08 06:51 PM
                                            Intel x86 registers to the rescue!David Hess2017/04/09 03:57 PM
                                        Memory laneJohn Yates2017/04/11 02:24 PM
                                          Memory lanesomeone2017/04/12 06:27 AM
                                            Memory laneJohn Yates2017/04/12 03:01 PM
                                          Memory laneIreland2017/04/12 11:23 AM
                                    Intel x86 registers to the rescue!dmcq2017/04/07 12:47 AM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess2017/04/08 06:16 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religiongallier22017/04/05 11:49 PM
                            6502 = accumulator machine (NT)Wilco2017/04/06 03:22 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religiongallier22017/04/06 12:12 AM
                            same difference ...RichardC2017/04/06 12:57 PM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRonald Maas2017/04/04 09:04 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/05 12:03 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionAdrian2017/04/05 02:24 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiongallier22017/04/06 12:33 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRonald Maas2017/04/08 09:07 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionJohn Yates2017/04/05 03:39 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/07 03:30 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionwumpus2017/04/08 08:41 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds2017/04/08 11:43 AM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/08 08:53 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds2017/04/09 08:52 AM
                            VAX/VMS compatibilityRichardC2017/04/09 07:54 AM
                              VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 08:19 AM
                              VAX/VMS compatibilityMichael S2017/04/09 08:20 AM
                                VAX/VMS compatibilityRichardC2017/04/09 08:32 AM
                                  VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq2017/04/09 08:47 AM
                                    I suppose, you are only familiar with British mainfraimes (NT)Michael S2017/04/09 08:55 AM
                                      I suppose, you are only familiar with British mainfraimesdmcq2017/04/09 05:12 PM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 09:08 AM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel2017/04/09 09:51 AM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 12:35 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityanon2017/04/09 06:24 PM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 06:47 PM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityanon2017/04/09 07:29 PM
                                              VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 07:43 PM
                                              Ireland = AI botanonymou52017/04/10 05:21 AM
                                                That joke is getting old (NT)Anon2017/04/11 01:23 AM
                                                  It isn't 100% a joke.Mark Roulo2017/04/11 07:13 AM
                                                    It isn't 100% a joke.Michael_S2017/04/11 10:19 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.Ireland2017/04/11 10:48 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.anonymou52017/04/12 09:40 PM
                                                    It isn't 100% a joke.Dan Downs2017/04/11 04:05 PM
                                                      Shaka, when the walls fell (NT)Darmok2017/04/12 12:19 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.Brendan2017/04/13 05:34 AM
                                                        Can Someone Fix "Greater Than/Less Than" Handling Bugs??Brendan2017/04/13 05:38 AM
                                                          6th decadeMichael S2017/04/13 06:34 AM
                                                            6th decadeIreland2017/04/13 10:17 AM
                                                        It isn't 100% a joke.Gabriele Svelto2017/04/15 08:14 AM
                                                          It isn't 100% a joke.dmcq2017/04/16 05:09 AM
                                                            It isn't 100% a joke.Brendan2017/04/16 03:01 PM
                                                              The less loquacious left it alone (NT)Anon2017/04/18 12:49 AM
                                                To Wit, many here..John H2017/04/12 11:40 AM
                                                  To Wit, many here..Ireland2017/04/12 11:54 AM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq2017/04/09 05:02 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland2017/04/09 05:19 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel2017/04/09 10:20 PM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilitywumpus2017/04/10 06:14 AM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel2017/04/10 08:10 AM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq2017/04/10 10:11 AM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilityJohn Yates2017/04/12 07:42 PM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel2017/04/12 09:19 PM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityJohn Yates2017/04/12 09:41 PM
                                      VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnMichael S2017/04/13 04:54 AM
                                        VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnRob Thorpe2017/04/14 08:19 AM
                                          VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnJohn Yates2017/04/14 04:20 PM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq2017/04/13 06:23 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/08 11:04 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/08 12:01 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionwumpus2017/04/08 05:57 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/09 10:49 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/09 04:15 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/09 11:07 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/10 02:17 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/10 09:01 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/10 11:27 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/10 03:25 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/10 05:12 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/10 10:54 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/11 03:14 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/11 03:44 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/11 09:03 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionWilco2017/04/11 02:04 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/11 09:07 PM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/11 02:15 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionrwessel2017/04/11 05:38 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/11 08:36 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/12 02:01 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto2017/04/12 02:38 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 12:20 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/11 10:54 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/12 01:52 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/12 04:27 AM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/12 08:43 AM
                                                      RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/12 11:03 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/11 02:32 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/11 10:45 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/12 10:07 AM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religiongpd2017/04/12 02:31 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 11:16 AM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/12 11:27 AM
                                                      RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 12:02 PM
                                                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/12 12:46 PM
                                                          RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 03:41 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 11:33 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/12 12:56 PM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionTravis2017/04/12 04:22 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/11 12:08 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/11 02:10 AM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/11 03:28 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/11 04:46 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionmatthew2017/04/11 08:59 AM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon2017/04/11 01:28 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/11 11:41 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon.12017/04/10 08:03 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B2017/04/11 03:47 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko2017/04/03 11:45 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/04 01:45 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/04 09:30 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq2017/04/04 09:43 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess2017/04/05 02:18 AM
                RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S2017/04/05 04:02 AM
            RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess2017/04/05 01:54 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC2017/04/05 04:31 AM
                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala2017/04/05 05:23 AM
                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?dmcq2017/04/05 07:34 AM
                    MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala2017/04/05 08:28 AM
                      MIPS condition evaluation?Michael S2017/04/05 10:28 AM
                        MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala2017/04/05 10:55 AM
                          MIPS condition evaluation?Michael S2017/04/05 12:12 PM
                            MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala2017/04/05 12:54 PM
                              MIPS condition evaluation?dmcq2017/04/05 01:02 PM
                              MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala2017/04/05 01:03 PM
                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC2017/04/05 09:18 AM
                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/05 11:20 AM
                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC2017/04/05 01:23 PM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/05 05:51 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC2017/04/05 09:06 PM
                            TransputerRichardC2017/04/06 05:20 AM
                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/06 08:54 AM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC2017/04/06 11:14 AM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/06 11:40 AM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC2017/04/06 12:01 PM
                                    your theoryRichardC2017/04/06 01:49 PM
                                      your theoryLinus Torvalds2017/04/06 02:39 PM
                                        your theoryLinus Torvalds2017/04/06 03:04 PM
                                          your theoryIreland2017/04/06 03:48 PM
                                            Integrators of RISC cpu's interested only in software app salesIreland2017/04/06 05:11 PM
                                          cheap machines with GUIsRichardC2017/04/07 04:40 AM
                                            compatibility and evolutionary strategyRichardC2017/04/07 06:27 AM
                                              68K clones?Michael S2017/04/07 06:40 AM
                                                68K clones?Yuhong Bao2017/04/07 07:54 AM
                                                Apollo core ...Mark Roulo2017/04/07 10:28 AM
                                                68K clones?Ronald Maas2017/04/07 06:07 PM
                                                68K clones?Per Hesselgren2017/04/08 01:05 AM
                                                  68K clones?Per Hesselgren2017/04/08 01:06 AM
                                                    68K clones?Michael S2017/04/08 12:10 PM
                                              compatibility and evolutionary strategyIreland2017/04/07 09:33 AM
                                              compatibility and evolutionary strategyIreland2017/04/07 09:50 AM
                                                high-margin productsRichardC2017/04/07 10:16 AM
                                                  high-margin productsIreland2017/04/07 02:53 PM
                                                    high-margin productswumpus2017/04/08 07:45 PM
                                                      high-margin productsRichardC2017/04/09 06:06 AM
                                                        high-margin productsMichael S2017/04/09 06:26 AM
                                                          high-margin productsIreland2017/04/09 07:13 AM
                                                            high-margin productswumpus2017/04/09 10:01 AM
                                                          user-visible ISA's still evolvingRichardC2017/04/09 08:09 AM
                                                            user-visible ISA's still evolvingIreland2017/04/09 03:08 PM
                                                      Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . Ireland2017/04/09 08:08 AM
                                                        Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . bakaneko2017/04/09 10:45 AM
                                                          Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . Ireland2017/04/09 01:32 PM
                                        your theoryRichardC2017/04/06 04:57 PM
                                          your theoryIreland2017/04/06 05:29 PM
                                            your theoryIreland2017/04/06 05:45 PM
                                          x86 ISA license historyRichardC2017/04/06 05:31 PM
                                            x86 ISA license historywumpus2017/04/07 07:35 AM
                                              x86 ISA license historyRichardC2017/04/07 09:26 AM
                                          370 on 68KMatt Sayler2017/04/06 05:38 PM
                                            370 on 68KDavid Hess2017/04/08 10:18 AM
                                          your theoryLinus Torvalds2017/04/06 07:20 PM
                                            your theoryRichardC2017/04/06 08:34 PM
                                              Intel's clone warsRichardC2017/04/06 08:42 PM
                                              your theoryIreland2017/04/07 09:05 AM
                                            your theoryrwessel2017/04/06 10:53 PM
                                            your theorygallier22017/04/07 02:13 AM
                                            your theorygallier22017/04/07 02:37 AM
                                              your theoryMichael S2017/04/07 05:54 AM
                                                your theorygallier22017/04/07 09:57 AM
                                              your theoryDavid Hess2017/04/08 10:26 AM
                                                your theoryYuhong Bao2017/04/08 10:28 AM
                                                your theorygallier22017/04/09 05:38 AM
                                                  your theoryMichael S2017/04/09 06:08 AM
                                                    your theoryrwessel2017/04/09 10:04 AM
                                                      your theoryDavid Hess2017/04/09 04:46 PM
                                                        your theoryrwessel2017/04/09 08:58 PM
                                                  your theoryDavid Hess2017/04/09 04:23 PM
                                                your theoryRichardC2017/04/09 08:16 AM
                                                  your theoryDavid Hess2017/04/09 04:58 PM
                                            Positive point about 80286Michael S2017/04/07 06:31 AM
                                              Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/07 10:00 AM
                                                Positive point about 80286Yuhong Bao2017/04/07 02:43 PM
                                                  Positive point about 80286Per Hesselgren2017/04/08 01:16 AM
                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/08 10:49 AM
                                                  Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/09 05:44 AM
                                                    Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 06:35 AM
                                                      Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/09 07:18 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 07:30 AM
                                                          Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/09 10:43 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 05:19 PM
                                                              Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:24 PM
                                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 06:01 PM
                                                                  Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 06:15 PM
                                                              Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren2017/04/10 12:22 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren2017/04/10 01:01 AM
                                                                  Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren2017/04/10 01:39 PM
                                                                    Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren2017/04/18 09:14 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/10 12:26 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286Michael_S2017/04/10 03:21 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 05:11 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/10 01:15 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/10 01:20 AM
                                                    Positive point about 80286rwessel2017/04/09 10:12 AM
                                                      Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/09 11:38 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 12:17 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 05:40 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:48 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286rwessel2017/04/09 11:05 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286wumpus2017/04/10 06:31 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286rwessel2017/04/10 07:37 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/10 09:53 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 05:51 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286wumpus2017/04/11 06:41 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286gallier22017/04/12 04:20 AM
                                                          Positive point about 80286Yuhong Bao2017/04/17 01:14 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/17 02:37 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286Joe Hodge2017/04/17 06:54 PM
                                                    Positive point about 80286David Hess2017/04/09 05:05 PM
                                                      Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:13 PM
                                                        Positive point about 80286wumpus2017/04/09 05:22 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:43 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:59 PM
                                                  Positive point about 80286wumpus2017/04/09 05:17 PM
                                                    Positive point about 80286Ireland2017/04/09 05:20 PM
                                        your theorydmcq2017/04/07 01:04 AM
                                        your theoryGabriele Svelto2017/04/09 01:47 PM
                                          your theoryIreland2017/04/09 05:53 PM
                                          your theoryrwessel2017/04/09 11:24 PM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S2017/04/07 11:24 AM
                                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/07 11:50 AM
                                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S2017/04/10 09:58 PM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Tim McCaffrey2017/04/06 06:32 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S2017/04/05 11:58 PM
                            Are you sure about orders of magnitude? (NT)Michael S2017/04/06 03:24 AM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Tim McCaffrey2017/04/06 06:21 PM
                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?somebody2017/04/06 09:41 AM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/06 12:01 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco2017/04/06 07:17 PM
                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/07 11:35 AM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/07 12:20 PM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase2017/04/07 01:22 PM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds2017/04/08 01:32 AM
                                  Software FP vs trap emulationWilco2017/04/08 05:20 AM
                                    Software FP vs trap emulationRonald Maas2017/04/08 08:45 AM
                                      Software FP vs trap emulationdmcq2017/04/08 10:29 AM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationdmcq2017/04/08 10:44 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationWilco2017/04/08 05:24 PM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds2017/04/08 10:52 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationIreland2017/04/08 11:46 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S2017/04/08 01:23 PM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds2017/04/08 03:38 PM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S2017/04/08 04:23 PM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulation@2017/04/08 06:17 PM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds2017/04/09 08:59 AM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulationIreland2017/04/09 09:20 AM
                                                Software FP vs trap emulationIreland2017/04/09 09:35 AM
                                                Software FP vs trap emulationrwessel2017/04/09 10:27 AM
                                                  Software FP vs trap emulationIreland2017/04/09 01:49 PM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulation@2017/04/09 11:59 AM
                                    Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S2017/04/08 12:46 PM
                                      Software FP vs trap emulationWilco2017/04/08 05:01 PM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationBrett2017/04/08 11:30 PM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationmatthew2017/04/09 01:14 AM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationWilco2017/04/09 07:10 AM
                                  Acorn vs DECRichardC2017/04/09 08:27 AM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase2017/04/09 01:02 PM
                                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco2017/04/09 02:52 PM
                                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase2017/04/09 06:16 PM
                                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco2017/04/10 01:40 AM
                                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase2017/04/10 01:00 PM
                                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco2017/04/10 04:19 PM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Ireland2017/04/07 05:34 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess2017/04/06 12:24 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/06 09:54 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionIreland2017/04/05 01:23 PM
            CISC religion?wumpus2017/04/08 09:49 AM
              CISC religion?Ireland2017/04/08 01:24 PM
              CISC religion?Ireland2017/04/08 01:39 PM
                Alan Turing Ireland2017/04/08 05:31 PM
                  Alan Turing rwessel2017/04/08 09:52 PM
                    Alan Turing Ireland2017/04/09 05:35 AM
                CISC religion?wumpus2017/04/08 07:19 PM
                  narrow vs wide skillsetsRichardC2017/04/08 07:42 PM
                  CISC religion?rwessel2017/04/08 09:33 PM
                    CISC religion?wumpus2017/04/09 05:10 PM
                      CISC religion?David Hess2017/04/09 07:56 PM
                        CISC religion?rwessel2017/04/10 12:25 AM
              CISC religion?RichardC2017/04/08 03:44 PM
                CISC religion?Michael S2017/04/08 04:47 PM
                  CISC religion?Michael S2017/04/08 04:52 PM
                    CISC religion?Ireland2017/04/08 05:16 PM
                      CISC religion?Michael S2017/04/08 05:26 PM
                        CISC religion?Ireland2017/04/08 05:41 PM
                          CISC religion?wumpus2017/04/08 08:04 PM
                            OT - faster RAMMichael S2017/04/09 05:26 AM
                          CISC religion?rwessel2017/04/08 10:10 PM
                            CISC religion?rwessel2017/04/08 10:10 PM
                      gone parallel now ...RichardC2017/04/08 07:15 PM
                CISC religion?gallier22017/04/09 06:47 AM
                  fascinating link, thanks! (NT)RichardC2017/04/09 09:46 AM
                CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/10 05:55 AM
                  CISC religion?anon2017/04/10 09:49 AM
                    CISC religion?Travis2017/04/10 11:30 AM
                      CISC religion?Travis2017/04/10 11:32 AM
                        CISC religion?anon2017/04/10 02:12 PM
                          CISC religion?Travis2017/04/10 07:41 PM
                            CISC religion?Michael_S2017/04/11 10:44 AM
                      CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/10 04:01 PM
                        CISC religion?Michael_S2017/04/11 10:56 AM
                          CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/11 01:27 PM
                        CISC religion?Wilco2017/04/11 01:45 PM
                          CISC religion?Michael S2017/04/11 02:07 PM
                          CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/11 04:32 PM
                    CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/10 04:24 PM
                  CISC religion?dmcq2017/04/10 02:17 PM
                    CISC religion?Ricardo B2017/04/10 05:16 PM
              CISC religion?Seni2017/04/09 04:06 AM
                CISC religion?Ireland2017/04/09 05:40 AM
                  CISC religion?wumpus2017/04/09 10:08 AM
                yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC2017/04/09 05:50 AM
                  yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni2017/04/09 06:19 AM
                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC2017/04/09 08:47 AM
                      minimal microcodeRichardC2017/04/09 09:33 AM
                        minimal microcodeSeni2017/04/09 10:02 AM
                          interesting, that makes sense (NT)RichardC2017/04/09 02:45 PM
                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheanon2017/04/09 08:57 PM
                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC2017/04/10 06:18 AM
                          yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni2017/04/10 03:51 PM
                            yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheWilco2017/04/11 02:56 AM
                              yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq2017/04/11 03:06 AM
                                no, ARM's 42 rows x 36 bits = 189 bytes (NT)RichardC2017/04/11 08:11 AM
                                  no, ARM's 42 rows x 36 bits = 189 bytesdmcq2017/04/12 04:42 AM
                              yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni2017/04/11 12:27 PM
                                yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel2017/04/11 06:02 PM
                                  yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni2017/04/11 10:27 PM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC2017/04/12 11:06 AM
                                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni2017/04/12 12:47 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheWilco2017/04/12 01:38 PM
                                        not the normal usageRichardC2017/04/12 07:58 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel2017/04/12 09:40 PM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq2017/04/12 02:19 PM
                                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel2017/04/12 09:49 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq2017/04/13 03:44 AM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheanon2017/04/12 08:06 PM
                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachewumpus2017/04/10 06:37 AM
  Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsAnon2017/04/03 02:36 AM
    Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsDoug S2017/04/03 12:56 PM
      Or Samsung buys them, develops their own GPU, and uses the patents in the next lawsuit (NT)Anon2017/04/03 01:26 PM
        Or Samsung buys them, develops their own GPU, and uses the patents in the next lawsuit Michael S2017/04/03 02:33 PM
        Or ARM buys them, and gets any money they can from their IP and customersdmcq2017/04/04 09:55 AM
  IMGTEC stock has crashed already.VertexMaster2017/04/03 05:33 AM
    IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Andreas2017/04/03 07:33 AM
      IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Exophase2017/04/03 09:43 AM
    IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Doug S2017/04/03 12:51 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?