By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), July 23, 2018 1:47 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Groo (charlie.delete@this.semiaccurate.com) on July 23, 2018 1:53 pm wrote:
> David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 23, 2018 10:02 am wrote:
> > In honor of our anniversary, I have a new article on Intel's 3DXP DIMMs:
> >
> > Intel will offer 3DXP-based DIMMs (previously codenamed Apache
> > Pass) that use the DDR4 interface on the next-generation
> > Cascade Lake server processor. The first DIMMs will be available in 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB capacities and
> > work with a new software architecture for persistent memory.
> > Intel and its partners have enabled the new persistent
> > memory programming model for Java, Linux, VMware, and Windows and many customers are eagerly awaiting the
> > non-volatile, high-capacity memory for in-memory databases and other applications.
> >
> > I also point out many of the areas Intel has been less than forthcoming,
> > particularly around security and serviceability.
> >
> > As always - comments, questions, and feedback are appreciated.
> >
> > David
>
> Have you seen the pricing? Tis to laugh.
>
> -Charlie
>
128 GB DDR4 => ~3K USD
It means that Intel can easily charge 1.5K USD for 128GB 3DXP DIMM, 4K for 256 GB and as much as they want for 512 GB.
That is, if both write speed and endurance is good.
How good is good? I don't know.
Let's say 5 GB/s and 50 PBW for 128 GB DIMMS, 5 GB/s and 120 PBW for 256 GB DIMM.
> David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 23, 2018 10:02 am wrote:
> > In honor of our anniversary, I have a new article on Intel's 3DXP DIMMs:
> >
> > Intel will offer 3DXP-based DIMMs (previously codenamed Apache
> > Pass) that use the DDR4 interface on the next-generation
> > Cascade Lake server processor. The first DIMMs will be available in 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB capacities and
> > work with a new software architecture for persistent memory.
> > Intel and its partners have enabled the new persistent
> > memory programming model for Java, Linux, VMware, and Windows and many customers are eagerly awaiting the
> > non-volatile, high-capacity memory for in-memory databases and other applications.
> >
> > I also point out many of the areas Intel has been less than forthcoming,
> > particularly around security and serviceability.
> >
> > As always - comments, questions, and feedback are appreciated.
> >
> > David
>
> Have you seen the pricing? Tis to laugh.
>
> -Charlie
>
128 GB DDR4 => ~3K USD
It means that Intel can easily charge 1.5K USD for 128GB 3DXP DIMM, 4K for 256 GB and as much as they want for 512 GB.
That is, if both write speed and endurance is good.
How good is good? I don't know.
Let's say 5 GB/s and 50 PBW for 128 GB DIMMS, 5 GB/s and 120 PBW for 256 GB DIMM.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
New article on Intel's 3DXP | David Kanter | 2018/07/23 09:02 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Groo | 2018/07/23 12:53 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Michael S | 2018/07/23 01:47 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Teemo | 2018/07/23 04:38 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Wes Felterw | 2018/07/23 08:41 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | David Kanter | 2018/07/24 03:31 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Emil Briggs | 2018/07/24 05:30 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | David Kanter | 2018/07/24 05:49 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Michael S | 2018/07/24 05:59 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Emil Briggs | 2018/07/24 07:29 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Doug S | 2018/07/24 07:49 AM |
price | Michael S | 2018/07/24 02:16 PM |
price | Doug S | 2018/07/24 02:32 PM |
price | Michael S | 2018/07/24 02:49 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | blaine | 2018/12/03 03:40 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Wes Felter | 2018/12/04 11:07 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | RichardC | 2018/12/04 03:09 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Michael S | 2018/07/24 05:51 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Adrian | 2018/07/24 06:35 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Ricardo B | 2018/07/24 08:24 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | bakaneko | 2018/07/24 05:55 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Etienne | 2018/07/25 04:02 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/01 05:23 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Michael S | 2018/12/01 07:56 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/01 08:21 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/01 12:52 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian` | 2018/12/01 02:43 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/01 10:05 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/11 04:17 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/11 04:42 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/11 07:20 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | wumpus | 2018/12/11 08:36 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/11 04:21 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/11 04:32 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/11 11:29 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 10:32 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | wumpus | 2018/12/12 11:07 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 11:41 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/12 02:55 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/12 02:49 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anne O. Nymous | 2018/12/12 12:14 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/12 05:28 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 10:26 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anne O. Nymous | 2018/12/12 01:10 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | innocent bystander | 2018/12/12 09:34 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/12 01:42 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/02 04:53 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/02 06:01 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/02 10:34 AM |
Intel's 3DXP availability | Etienne Lorrain | 2018/12/03 03:50 PM |