Article: Intel’s Plans for 3DXP DIMMs Emerge
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), July 24, 2018 6:49 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Emil Briggs (me.delete@this.nowherespam.com) on July 24, 2018 6:30 am wrote:
> David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 24, 2018 4:31 am wrote:
> > Teemo (teemo.delete@this.riot.com) on July 23, 2018 5:38 pm wrote:
> > > David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 23, 2018 10:02 am wrote:
> > > > In honor of our anniversary, I have a new article on Intel's 3DXP DIMMs:
> > > >
> > > > Intel will offer 3DXP-based DIMMs (previously codenamed Apache
> > > > Pass) that use the DDR4 interface on the next-generation
> > > > Cascade Lake server processor. The first DIMMs will be available in 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB capacities and
> > > > work with a new software architecture for persistent memory.
> > > > Intel and its partners have enabled the new persistent
> > > > memory programming model for Java, Linux, VMware, and Windows and many customers are eagerly awaiting the
> > > > non-volatile, high-capacity memory for in-memory databases and other applications.
> > > >
> > > > I also point out many of the areas Intel has been less than forthcoming,
> > > > particularly around security and serviceability.
> > > >
> > > > As always - comments, questions, and feedback are appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > >
> > > Has anyone ever done a comparison of Xpoint to flash DIMMs?
> >
> > Flash DIMMs are an abomination. The access latency is terrible, and you still have block
> > size mismatches. Most DDR4 fetches are going to be 64B, maybe 128B. Flash accesses are
> > much much bigger. So you are wasting internal bandwidth. Moreover, there is always the
> > possibility of GC, which would then tie up a DDR4 transaction for a VERY long time.
> >
> > Fundamentally, flash on DIMMs is a technology mismatch. 3DXP makes
> > a lot more sense, but there is still room for improvement.
> >
> > From a product standpoint, Diablo memory is dead and Sandisk UltraDIMM is DDR3. So why bother?
> >
> > David
>
> If I recall correctly Micron launched a product that consisted of DDR4 dimms with a super cap and flash.
> When power goes down the DRAM contents are written to the flash but otherwise it acts as a normal DIMM.
>
Yup, and it's about 16GB!
David
> David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 24, 2018 4:31 am wrote:
> > Teemo (teemo.delete@this.riot.com) on July 23, 2018 5:38 pm wrote:
> > > David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on July 23, 2018 10:02 am wrote:
> > > > In honor of our anniversary, I have a new article on Intel's 3DXP DIMMs:
> > > >
> > > > Intel will offer 3DXP-based DIMMs (previously codenamed Apache
> > > > Pass) that use the DDR4 interface on the next-generation
> > > > Cascade Lake server processor. The first DIMMs will be available in 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB capacities and
> > > > work with a new software architecture for persistent memory.
> > > > Intel and its partners have enabled the new persistent
> > > > memory programming model for Java, Linux, VMware, and Windows and many customers are eagerly awaiting the
> > > > non-volatile, high-capacity memory for in-memory databases and other applications.
> > > >
> > > > I also point out many of the areas Intel has been less than forthcoming,
> > > > particularly around security and serviceability.
> > > >
> > > > As always - comments, questions, and feedback are appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > >
> > > Has anyone ever done a comparison of Xpoint to flash DIMMs?
> >
> > Flash DIMMs are an abomination. The access latency is terrible, and you still have block
> > size mismatches. Most DDR4 fetches are going to be 64B, maybe 128B. Flash accesses are
> > much much bigger. So you are wasting internal bandwidth. Moreover, there is always the
> > possibility of GC, which would then tie up a DDR4 transaction for a VERY long time.
> >
> > Fundamentally, flash on DIMMs is a technology mismatch. 3DXP makes
> > a lot more sense, but there is still room for improvement.
> >
> > From a product standpoint, Diablo memory is dead and Sandisk UltraDIMM is DDR3. So why bother?
> >
> > David
>
> If I recall correctly Micron launched a product that consisted of DDR4 dimms with a super cap and flash.
> When power goes down the DRAM contents are written to the flash but otherwise it acts as a normal DIMM.
>
Yup, and it's about 16GB!
David
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
New article on Intel's 3DXP | David Kanter | 2018/07/23 10:02 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Groo | 2018/07/23 01:53 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Michael S | 2018/07/23 02:47 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Teemo | 2018/07/23 05:38 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Wes Felterw | 2018/07/23 09:41 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | David Kanter | 2018/07/24 04:31 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Emil Briggs | 2018/07/24 06:30 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | David Kanter | 2018/07/24 06:49 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Michael S | 2018/07/24 06:59 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Emil Briggs | 2018/07/24 08:29 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Doug S | 2018/07/24 08:49 AM |
price | Michael S | 2018/07/24 03:16 PM |
price | Doug S | 2018/07/24 03:32 PM |
price | Michael S | 2018/07/24 03:49 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | blaine | 2018/12/03 04:40 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Wes Felter | 2018/12/04 12:07 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | RichardC | 2018/12/04 04:09 PM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Michael S | 2018/07/24 06:51 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Adrian | 2018/07/24 07:35 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | Ricardo B | 2018/07/24 09:24 AM |
Flash DIMMs = bad idea | bakaneko | 2018/07/24 06:55 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Etienne | 2018/07/25 05:02 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/01 06:23 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Michael S | 2018/12/01 08:56 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/01 09:21 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/01 01:52 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian` | 2018/12/01 03:43 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/01 11:05 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/11 05:17 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/11 05:42 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/11 08:20 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | wumpus | 2018/12/11 09:36 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/11 05:21 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/11 05:32 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/12 12:29 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 11:32 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | wumpus | 2018/12/12 12:07 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 12:41 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/12 03:55 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anon | 2018/12/12 03:49 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anne O. Nymous | 2018/12/12 01:14 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/12 06:28 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Maynard Handley | 2018/12/12 11:26 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Anne O. Nymous | 2018/12/12 02:10 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | innocent bystander | 2018/12/12 10:34 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | anon | 2018/12/12 02:42 PM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/02 05:53 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Adrian | 2018/12/02 07:01 AM |
New article on Intel's 3DXP | Howard Chu | 2018/12/02 11:34 AM |
Intel's 3DXP availability | Etienne Lorrain | 2018/12/03 04:50 PM |