By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), October 12, 2018 2:17 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Doug S (foo.delete@this.bar.bar) on October 12, 2018 2:01 am wrote:
>
> No, there's no reason at all and I don't know why anon makes it sound as if it would be difficult.
> This is the whole point of blade servers, after all - the servers slot in vertically rather
> than horizontally so aren't restricted by the width of the rack. Then it is down to how tall
> the blades need to be (how many rack units) and how closely you can space them together within
> the standard rack width and still achieve the necessary cooling.
>
I never was in big datacenter myself. How blades are doing there?
Successful?
Were successful but losing it now?
Never were successful?
Depend on region?
And somewhat related: is HPE Moonshot 1500 Chassis still actively marketed?
>
> No, there's no reason at all and I don't know why anon makes it sound as if it would be difficult.
> This is the whole point of blade servers, after all - the servers slot in vertically rather
> than horizontally so aren't restricted by the width of the rack. Then it is down to how tall
> the blades need to be (how many rack units) and how closely you can space them together within
> the standard rack width and still achieve the necessary cooling.
>
I never was in big datacenter myself. How blades are doing there?
Successful?
Were successful but losing it now?
Never were successful?
Depend on region?
And somewhat related: is HPE Moonshot 1500 Chassis still actively marketed?
