By: Groo (charlie.delete@this.semiaccurate.com), January 20, 2019 9:47 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Charlie (charlie.delete@this.sa.com) on January 19, 2019 9:17 pm wrote:
>
> Your theory is disproven by the fact that you can set the TDP in 250 mW increments
> all the way from 255 W to 4 kW. In fact, you can set TDP between 300-400 W to
> manage overclocked SKX chips via RAPL instead of thermal throttling.
David,
Can you ban this asshole who is using my name please. Thank you.
-Charlie
>
> Your theory is disproven by the fact that you can set the TDP in 250 mW increments
> all the way from 255 W to 4 kW. In fact, you can set TDP between 300-400 W to
> manage overclocked SKX chips via RAPL instead of thermal throttling.
David,
Can you ban this asshole who is using my name please. Thank you.
-Charlie
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | John | 2019/01/18 04:52 AM |
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | Groo | 2019/01/18 07:52 AM |
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | Jeff S. | 2019/01/18 08:32 AM |
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | Charlie | 2019/01/18 10:40 AM |
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | dmcq | 2019/01/18 05:22 PM |
255W TDP = 8-bit integer? | David Hess | 2019/02/12 09:37 AM |
Yes. | Mark Roulo | 2019/01/18 06:19 PM |
Yes. | Charlie | 2019/01/19 09:17 PM |
Mark probably skipped the sarcasm tags (NT) | David Kanter | 2019/01/20 08:27 AM |
Mark probably skipped the sarcasm tags ... yes | Mark Roulo | 2019/01/20 02:32 PM |
David can you ban this asshole? | Groo | 2019/01/20 09:47 AM |