EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its own

By: Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org), August 9, 2019 8:25 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Alberto (git.delete@this.git.it) on August 9, 2019 2:12 am wrote:
> Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on August 8, 2019 8:58 pm wrote:
> > Alberto (git.delete@this.git.it) on August 8, 2019 3:42 pm wrote:
> > > Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 8, 2019 8:29 am wrote:
> > > > SPECpower_ssj2008 Results:
> > > >
> > > > Lenovo Think System SR655, AMD EPYC 7742 2.25Ghz - 19,149 Overall ssj_ops/watt
> > > >
> > > > And several more results in the same range.
> > > > https://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2019q3
> > > >
> > > > The best non-EPYC2 result:
> > > > ASUSTeK RS720-E9-RS8, Intel Xeon Pt 8280L, 2.7 GHz - 14,274 Overall ssj_ops/watt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The best EPYC1 result:
> > > > Dell PowerEdge R7425, AMD EPYC 7601, 2.20 GHz - 11,867 Overall ssj_ops/watt
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Impressive results.
> > > Look like they chosen the best 7nm silicon available at TSMC to assemble these SKUs. Basically they
> > > have two times the cores (same clock) with only 40W more power consumption over Naples, not to mention
> > > the Zen 2 core is stronger so it draw more power than plain Zen on the same process and the
> > > level of power hungry off die interconnection is INSANE.
> > >
> > > A great showcase, now AMD has to prove to be able to supply the channels with Epyc. One thing
> > > is to supply limited quantities, another one millions and millions of SKUs.
> > >
> > > Bet an hypothetical very popular cpu ala 7742 could be rated between 280-300W
> > > to have enough silicon for customers scoring an acceptable profit.
> > >
> > > Great show :). Now i want to see the manufacturing/financial side of the story.
> > >
> >
> > Where do you imagine the limitations will be?
> > (a) We know that TSMC 7nm low power process can supply Apple volumes (~200M/year). Of course 7nm high
> > performance is not EXACTLY the same process, but what reason is there to imagine that a machine tuned
> > to deliver 100s of millions per year, and with a year of experience, can't make millions?
> >
> > (b) Why do you imagine yield to be an issue? Obviously Apple yields are acceptable.
> > And sure, AMD could, in some crazy fantasy, be cherry picking the 5% best performing
> > chiplets and tossing the rest. But how does that make ANY business sense?
> > We've seen the spread of AMD's offerings (eg here:
> > https://www.anandtech.com/show/14694/amd-rome-epyc-2nd-gen/4
> > )
> > and one feature that is remarkable is how TIGHTLY clustered the peak frequencies are,
> > and the regular pattern of the base frequencies relative to core count. It looks like
> > the process is delivering what are actually extremely NON-VARIABLE chiplets...
> >
> > If your theory made any sense, at the very least AMD would
> > be selling the golden, 5% chiplets at a substantial
> > premium, while offering a second tier of average chiplets at rather lower frequency and cost.
> >
> > (c) The third gating factor COULD be assembly of the final product. I've seen nothing yet
> > about the packaging of Rome -- the technology or who does the work. But it doesn't seem to
> > be any particular stretch in terms of grossly higher frequencies, pin/trace densities, or
> > any other important metric. Which suggests that it's business as usual for the packaging,
> > and that there's no reason to believe that packaging will limit the numbers AMD can ship.
> >
> > Which leads me to ask, once again, exactly what it is that you imagine will prevent AMD from being
> > able to ship at the very least the same sort of volumes they've shipped over the past year?
> > (Of course if they were too pessimistic in their forecasts, they may have initial
> > temporary glitches meeting demand, simply because, as they said, they didn't expect
> > that their competition over the next year would be so inadequate...)
> No they will ship, and very likely even larger quantities than past years.
> My point is that this SKU is in class of its own from manufacturing point of view.
> It is thinked for low/medium volume, not certain for destroy Intel.
> After all 7nm process is not a marvel and even on phone SOCs has clearly showed that the
> TSMC claim of half power versus old generation is only a dream for low clocked FPGAs.
> Magically here we have nearly half power, a clear indication that this line is
> a showcase, and definitively not a frontal attack to Intel market share. A more
> relaxed TDP could have signified a declaration of war against the Blue Team.

Half power compared to what?
Naples wasn't just 14nm as opposed to 7nm, it was also on a different process (GloFo rather than TSMC). But TSMC's numbers are that TSMC 7nm is 40% of the power of TSMC 16nm.

Look Alberto, you seem like basically a nice guy. But you are destroying your reputation here by saying things that are very very silly, and you will probably come to regret it. It's time to admit that AMD did something fairly impressive here, and that it's likely to pay off well; and to stop making nonsensical claims about yield, economic viability, manufacturing difficulty or anything else. The more you say these things, the more you come across as living in a bubble, utterly unaware of what's being happening in the world for the past five years.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsMichael S2019/08/08 04:18 AM
  EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownMichael S2019/08/08 07:29 AM
    Wrong headline. Should be "SPECpower_ssj2008 - EPYC2 is in class of its own" (NT)Michael S2019/08/08 07:51 AM
    EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownAlberto2019/08/08 02:42 PM
      EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownblue2019/08/08 06:35 PM
      EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownMaynard Handley2019/08/08 07:58 PM
        EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownanon2019/08/09 01:00 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownAlberto2019/08/09 02:09 AM
            EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownblue2019/08/09 07:47 AM
        EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownAlberto2019/08/09 01:12 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownMaynard Handley2019/08/09 08:25 AM
            EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownDoug S2019/08/09 08:33 AM
              EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownanon2019/08/09 09:24 AM
            EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownAlberto2019/08/10 03:04 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownanon.12019/08/09 04:30 PM
        EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownme2019/08/09 08:58 PM
      EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark results - EPYC2 is in class of its ownanon2019/08/08 11:47 PM
  EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsLinus Torvalds2019/08/09 02:29 PM
    EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsanon2019/08/10 06:20 AM
      EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsme2019/08/10 06:36 AM
        EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsanon2019/08/10 07:20 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsanon.12019/08/10 08:40 AM
            EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsanon2019/08/10 09:38 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsblue2019/08/10 08:47 AM
        EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsAdrian2019/08/10 09:43 AM
          EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsme2019/08/10 10:06 AM
            EPYC SAP-SD 2-tier benchmark resultsMichael S2019/08/10 10:28 AM
    Big gotchas: poor specsjohn2019/08/10 09:54 AM
      Big gotchas: poor specsme2019/08/10 10:04 AM
      Big gotchas: poor specsanon2019/08/10 10:25 AM
        Big gotchas: poor specsLinus Torvalds2019/08/10 11:13 AM
          Big gotchas: poor specsanon2019/08/10 12:58 PM
          Big gotchas: poor caches2019/08/12 12:51 AM
            Big gotchas: poor caches2019/08/12 12:59 AM
            Big gotchas: poor cachesTravis Downs2019/08/12 08:15 AM
              parallelism vs. efficiencyhobold2019/08/13 03:43 AM
            Big gotchas: poor cachesAndy N2019/08/12 05:45 PM
              Big gotchas: poor cachesanon2019/08/12 11:43 PM
          Big gotchas: poor specsJouni Osmala2019/08/12 09:18 PM
            Big gotchas: poor specsAdrian2019/08/12 10:58 PM
              Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBJouni Osmala2019/08/13 03:00 AM
                Quiet and fast workstationsGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/13 05:00 AM
                  Quiet and fast workstationsAdrian2019/08/13 06:01 AM
                  Quiet and fast workstationsDavid Hess2019/08/13 12:51 PM
                    Quiet and fast workstationsGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/13 11:43 PM
                      Quiet and fast workstationsMichael S2019/08/14 01:09 AM
                        Quiet and fast workstationsGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/14 01:59 AM
                          Quiet and fast workstationsDavid Hess2019/08/14 05:05 PM
                        Quiet and fast workstationsDavid Hess2019/08/14 04:56 PM
                      Quiet and fast workstationsDavid Hess2019/08/14 05:30 PM
                  Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WJouni Osmala2019/08/15 02:12 AM
                    Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WAdrian2019/08/15 02:47 AM
                      Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WJouni Osmala2019/08/15 04:58 AM
                        Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WAdrian2019/08/15 11:12 PM
                          Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WAdrian2019/08/15 11:21 PM
                          Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WJouni osmala2019/08/16 08:46 AM
                            Passively cooled threadripper/xeon WGroo2019/08/16 11:07 AM
                Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBAdrian2019/08/13 05:39 AM
                Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBLinus Torvalds2019/08/13 11:12 AM
                  which graphics card?anonymous22019/08/13 11:52 AM
                    which graphics card?Linus Torvalds2019/08/13 12:12 PM
                  Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBDoug S2019/08/13 02:22 PM
                    Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBDavid Hess2019/08/14 05:38 PM
                  Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBJouni Osmala2019/08/13 11:09 PM
                    AIOsGroo2019/08/14 06:19 AM
                      AIOsGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/14 07:52 AM
                        AIOsGroo2019/08/14 08:49 AM
                      AIOsBrett2019/08/14 01:02 PM
                    Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBLinus Torvalds2019/08/14 10:10 AM
                  Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/14 12:33 AM
                    Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBAdrian2019/08/14 04:06 AM
                      Kernel compile 25-30s, noise 25-27dBGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/14 08:01 AM
                      AMD Bios, etc..Anon2019/08/14 10:39 PM
                        AMD Bios, etc..hobold2019/08/15 06:10 AM
                          AMD Bios, etc..Anon2019/08/15 03:20 PM
                        AMD Bios, etc..Jan Olšan2019/08/15 07:49 AM
                          AMD Bios, etc..Adrian2019/08/15 08:16 AM
                          AMD Bios, etc..Gro2019/08/15 09:57 AM
                        AMD Bios, etc..David Hess2019/08/16 04:39 AM
      Big gotchas: poor specsAdrian2019/08/10 12:28 PM
      Big gotchas: poor specsDummond D. Slow2019/08/10 12:57 PM
        Big gotchas: poor specsanon22019/08/10 11:33 PM
          Big gotchas: poor specsblue2019/08/10 11:57 PM
          Big gotchas: poor specsAdrian2019/08/11 04:41 AM
            Big gotchas: poor specsaaron spink2019/08/12 08:45 AM
              Big gotchas: poor specsFoo_2019/08/12 10:02 AM
              Big gotchas: poor specsTravis Downs2019/08/12 10:26 AM
                Big gotchas: poor specsGabriele Svelto2019/08/13 08:48 AM
                Big gotchas: poor specsaaron spink2019/08/13 06:23 PM
                  Big gotchas: poor specsDoug S2019/08/13 10:15 PM
                    Big gotchas: poor specsGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/14 12:35 AM
                    Big gotchas: poor specsaaron spink2019/08/15 04:16 PM
                      Big gotchas: poor specsJouni Osmala2019/08/15 08:03 PM
                        Big gotchas: poor specsaaron spink2019/08/19 03:05 AM
                          Big gotchas: poor specsMichael S2019/08/19 03:37 AM
                            Big gotchas: poor specsRicardo B2019/08/19 04:40 PM
                              Big gotchas: poor specsAaron Spink2019/08/25 01:29 AM
              Big gotchas: poor specsAdrian2019/08/12 10:31 AM
              Big gotchas: poor specsJukka Larja2019/08/13 06:37 AM
              Big gotchas: poor specsLinus Torvalds2019/08/13 10:31 AM
          Big gotchas: poor specsDummond D. Slow2019/08/11 05:23 AM
      FX-9590 > i7-9700KGian-Carlo Pascutto2019/08/12 09:37 AM
    RDRAND issueanonymou52019/08/10 01:52 PM
      RDRAND issueLinus Torvalds2019/08/10 03:15 PM
        RDRAND issueGionatan Danti2019/08/11 12:35 AM
          RDRAND issueLinus Torvalds2019/08/11 09:43 AM
            RDRAND issueLinus Torvalds2019/08/11 10:05 AM
              RDRAND issue@never_released2019/08/11 10:10 AM
                RDRAND issueLinus Torvalds2019/08/11 12:13 PM
                  Err....Groo2019/08/11 05:47 PM
                    Err.... This is a zero content fud posteye roll2019/08/11 07:48 PM
                    Err....Brendan2019/08/11 07:50 PM
                    Err....Jukka Larja2019/08/12 06:38 AM
                  RDRAND issueJose2019/08/12 01:33 AM
              RDRAND issueGionatan Danti2019/08/11 01:12 PM
            RDRAND issueaaron spink2019/08/12 08:18 AM
      RDRAND issuename2019/08/11 08:35 AM
Reply to this Topic
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊