By: Gabriele Svelto (gabriele.svelto.delete@this.gmail.com), November 4, 2019 6:45 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
none (none.delete@this.none.com) on November 4, 2019 5:38 am wrote:
> Why do you go back to more than 30 years ago? That's crap too :-) What about comparing
> to AArch64 which was in the work at about the same time as RISC-V?
Because AArch64 is not a new ISA, it's an evolution of an older one. It also wasn't "a three months project over the summer to design an ISA for academic use" done by a handful of people.
> Why do you go back to more than 30 years ago? That's crap too :-) What about comparing
> to AArch64 which was in the work at about the same time as RISC-V?
Because AArch64 is not a new ISA, it's an evolution of an older one. It also wasn't "a three months project over the summer to design an ISA for academic use" done by a handful of people.