By: rwessel (robertwessel.delete@this.yahoo.com), January 9, 2020 7:00 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
none (none.delete@this.none.com) on January 9, 2020 2:54 am wrote:
> Anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on January 9, 2020 12:41 am wrote:
> > none (none.delete@this.none.com) on January 8, 2020 10:50 pm wrote:
> > > The 8086 data bus to memory was 16-bit wide and it had a 6-byte queue between memory and
> > > execution unit (see this for instance).
> >
> > I know, I wasn't referring to 8086 in particular, but to contemporary CPUs which were
> > most 8 bits, even the most popular x86 of the time 8088 had a 8 bit data bus
>
> As far as I remember 8086 existed before 8088 and was the first design in the x86 line.
> Anyway that doesn't invalidate your point at all :-)
>
> > > And source compatibility with i808x.
> >
> > They were marketed as source compatible but were not source compatible,
>
> They were through the use of an assembler that accepted 808x code and output 8086 code.
> I don't know how well that worked. I wonder if one can still find that Intel tool (or
> perhaps I remember wrong and it never was proposed by Intel).
>
> Such a tool was also proposed by Digital Research (xlt86) and by Sorcim (trans86). But I
> agree that's no proof that 8086 was designed with 808x compatibility in mind.
>
> Ref: https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1982-06/page/n321
The tools I saw were not assemblers, but translators, that transformed each 8080 instruction into 8086 code, producing a new assembler source file. Intel fairly carefully designed the 8086 so that almost all 8080 instructions could be translated into a semantically identical sequence of one or two 8086 instructions, right down to the flag settings.
This required a particular set of register assignments (so A went to AL, B and C to CH and CL, etc.).
Most 8080 instructions converted to a single 8086 instruction, a number of the branches converted (at least conditionally to two, given the narrow branch range on the 8086, also all the conditional return instructions). If memory serves, there were four instructions that required longer sequences. The three 16-bit manipulation instructions (DAD, INX, DEX) which had irregular flag setting on the 8080, so they needed some fiddle when translated, and well XTHL (which required a three instruction sequence to exchange to top-of-stack with HL).
IIRC, the translator unconditionally produced the reversed-sense conditional jump around an unconditional near jump, so the standard first task after the translation was to review all of those, plus an translations of the three 16-bit instructions (if you didn't care about flag settings, each could be a single instruction).
Some of the translators, did a better job of some of that analysis and did some of those basic optimizations directly (Digital Researches' XLT86, for example). For which there's even a manual online:
http://www.s100computers.com/Software%20Folder/Assembler%20Collection/Digital%20Research%20XLT86%20Manual.pdf
You can see their translations on pages 12-16. Interestingly(?), they have a better sequence for XTHL than I remember.
This all actually worked reasonably well, and translated code on a 4.77MHz 8088 was usually a nice chunk faster than the base code on a 2MHz 8080. A proper conversion would do better, of course.
I have the Intel table documenting the translations someplace, if someone was actually interested, I could probably scan and post it (although the DR reference linked about covers mostly the same stuff).
> Anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on January 9, 2020 12:41 am wrote:
> > none (none.delete@this.none.com) on January 8, 2020 10:50 pm wrote:
> > > The 8086 data bus to memory was 16-bit wide and it had a 6-byte queue between memory and
> > > execution unit (see this for instance).
> >
> > I know, I wasn't referring to 8086 in particular, but to contemporary CPUs which were
> > most 8 bits, even the most popular x86 of the time 8088 had a 8 bit data bus
>
> As far as I remember 8086 existed before 8088 and was the first design in the x86 line.
> Anyway that doesn't invalidate your point at all :-)
>
> > > And source compatibility with i808x.
> >
> > They were marketed as source compatible but were not source compatible,
>
> They were through the use of an assembler that accepted 808x code and output 8086 code.
> I don't know how well that worked. I wonder if one can still find that Intel tool (or
> perhaps I remember wrong and it never was proposed by Intel).
>
> Such a tool was also proposed by Digital Research (xlt86) and by Sorcim (trans86). But I
> agree that's no proof that 8086 was designed with 808x compatibility in mind.
>
> Ref: https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1982-06/page/n321
The tools I saw were not assemblers, but translators, that transformed each 8080 instruction into 8086 code, producing a new assembler source file. Intel fairly carefully designed the 8086 so that almost all 8080 instructions could be translated into a semantically identical sequence of one or two 8086 instructions, right down to the flag settings.
This required a particular set of register assignments (so A went to AL, B and C to CH and CL, etc.).
Most 8080 instructions converted to a single 8086 instruction, a number of the branches converted (at least conditionally to two, given the narrow branch range on the 8086, also all the conditional return instructions). If memory serves, there were four instructions that required longer sequences. The three 16-bit manipulation instructions (DAD, INX, DEX) which had irregular flag setting on the 8080, so they needed some fiddle when translated, and well XTHL (which required a three instruction sequence to exchange to top-of-stack with HL).
IIRC, the translator unconditionally produced the reversed-sense conditional jump around an unconditional near jump, so the standard first task after the translation was to review all of those, plus an translations of the three 16-bit instructions (if you didn't care about flag settings, each could be a single instruction).
Some of the translators, did a better job of some of that analysis and did some of those basic optimizations directly (Digital Researches' XLT86, for example). For which there's even a manual online:
http://www.s100computers.com/Software%20Folder/Assembler%20Collection/Digital%20Research%20XLT86%20Manual.pdf
You can see their translations on pages 12-16. Interestingly(?), they have a better sequence for XTHL than I remember.
This all actually worked reasonably well, and translated code on a 4.77MHz 8088 was usually a nice chunk faster than the base code on a 2MHz 8080. A proper conversion would do better, of course.
I have the Intel table documenting the translations someplace, if someone was actually interested, I could probably scan and post it (although the DR reference linked about covers mostly the same stuff).
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Nuances related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler | Beastian | 2020/01/03 11:46 AM |
Nuances related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler | Montaray Jack | 2020/01/03 12:14 PM |
Nuances related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler | Montaray Jack | 2020/01/03 12:49 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/03 06:05 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Beastian | 2020/01/04 11:03 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Malte Skarupke | 2020/01/04 11:22 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/04 12:31 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | dmcq | 2020/01/05 06:33 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | smeuletz | 2020/01/06 01:05 AM |
Do not blame others for your unfinished job | smeuletz | 2020/01/06 01:08 AM |
Where did all the experts come from? Did Linus get linked? (NT) | anon | 2020/01/06 03:27 AM |
Phoronix | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/06 04:04 AM |
Phoronix | Salvatore De Dominicis | 2020/01/06 06:59 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Chester | 2020/01/06 08:17 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | smeuletz | 2020/01/06 09:11 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Chester | 2020/01/06 09:54 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | smeuletz | 2020/01/06 10:33 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/06 11:58 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Gionatan Danti | 2020/01/06 12:13 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/06 12:28 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Gionatan Danti | 2020/01/06 12:52 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | John Scott | 2020/01/10 07:48 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | supernovas | 2020/01/10 09:01 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/10 11:45 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | GDan | 2020/04/06 02:10 AM |
Oracle | Anon3 | 2020/04/07 05:42 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | smeuletz | 2020/01/07 03:07 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/07 12:40 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Etienne | 2020/01/08 01:08 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | smeuletz | 2020/01/08 01:18 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Michael S | 2020/01/08 01:56 AM |
Not deprecating irrelevant API: sched_yield() on quantum computers? | smeuletz | 2020/01/07 03:34 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | magicalgoat | 2020/01/09 04:58 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/09 09:37 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Anon3 | 2020/01/10 03:40 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | rwessel | 2020/01/06 09:04 PM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/06 11:11 AM |
Do not blame anyone. Please give polite, constructive criticism | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/06 01:36 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Howard Chu | 2020/01/09 10:39 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/10 11:30 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | president ltd | 2020/01/04 01:44 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Jörn Engel | 2020/01/04 11:34 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Emil Briggs | 2020/01/04 12:13 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Jörn Engel | 2020/01/04 12:46 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/04 01:24 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/04 02:54 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Jörn Engel | 2020/01/05 09:21 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/05 11:42 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Jörn Engel | 2020/01/05 01:45 PM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/05 03:30 PM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Jörn Engel | 2020/01/05 06:03 PM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | RichardC | 2020/01/06 06:11 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/06 12:11 PM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/06 02:20 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | xilun | 2020/01/06 04:19 PM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Konrad Schwarz | 2020/01/13 03:36 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/13 03:53 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/13 04:36 AM |
FUTEX_LOCK_PI performance | rwessel | 2020/01/13 05:22 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | rainstar | 2020/01/04 09:58 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Charles Ellis | 2020/01/05 03:00 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Richard | 2020/01/05 08:58 AM |
It's hard to separate | Michael S | 2020/01/05 10:17 AM |
It's hard to separate | rainstared | 2020/01/06 12:52 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Kanter | 2020/01/08 08:27 AM |
It's hard to separate | Anon | 2020/01/08 08:37 PM |
It's hard to separate | none | 2020/01/08 10:50 PM |
It's hard to separate | Anon | 2020/01/09 12:41 AM |
It's hard to separate | none | 2020/01/09 02:54 AM |
It's hard to separate | gallier2 | 2020/01/09 03:19 AM |
It's hard to separate | Anon | 2020/01/09 04:12 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 04:24 AM |
It's hard to separate | gallier2 | 2020/01/09 04:58 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 06:09 AM |
It's hard to separate | gallier2 | 2020/01/09 04:42 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 03:41 AM |
It's hard to separate | Anon | 2020/01/09 04:24 AM |
It's hard to separate | gallier2 | 2020/01/09 05:07 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/09 08:27 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 09:15 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/09 09:45 AM |
It's hard to separate | Anon | 2020/01/09 10:15 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 10:51 AM |
It's hard to separate | Brett | 2020/01/09 12:49 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Brett | 2020/01/10 09:53 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/11 06:06 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Adrian | 2020/01/11 06:29 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/11 07:45 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/11 07:04 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ronald Maas | 2020/01/12 09:47 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/12 11:15 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/12 10:34 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Jose | 2020/01/13 12:23 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | gallier2 | 2020/01/13 12:42 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Jose | 2020/01/13 09:04 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/13 09:40 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/13 10:35 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/14 02:56 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Michael S | 2020/01/14 03:09 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/14 04:06 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/14 09:22 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/14 09:15 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/14 03:12 PM |
286 16 bit I/O | Tim McCaffrey | 2020/01/15 10:25 AM |
286 16 bit I/O | David Hess | 2020/01/15 08:17 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/13 10:52 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/13 11:25 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/13 05:38 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/13 06:16 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/13 06:47 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | someone | 2020/01/14 06:54 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/14 07:31 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/14 05:29 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/15 02:26 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Tim McCaffrey | 2020/01/15 10:27 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/15 01:32 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/15 02:47 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/15 03:08 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/15 04:16 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/15 04:31 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/15 05:46 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/15 06:04 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/15 08:53 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/16 06:27 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/16 07:33 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ronald Maas | 2020/01/16 11:05 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/17 07:15 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/17 01:59 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/17 06:40 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/18 07:42 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | gallier2 | 2020/01/19 07:02 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/18 06:12 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/15 08:49 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | gallier2 | 2020/01/15 11:57 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/16 01:30 AM |
IBM PC success | Etienne | 2020/01/16 05:42 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/16 06:32 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Brett | 2020/01/17 12:38 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/18 06:28 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/18 06:22 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/15 08:30 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Maxwell | 2020/01/11 08:07 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | David Hess | 2020/01/11 08:40 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Maxwell | 2020/01/11 09:08 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ricardo B | 2020/01/11 07:42 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Devin | 2020/01/12 01:13 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Ricardo B | 2020/01/12 05:46 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Anon | 2020/01/13 04:10 AM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | gallier2 | 2020/01/13 05:07 AM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Anon | 2020/01/13 06:09 AM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Ricardo B | 2020/01/13 10:48 AM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Michael S | 2020/01/13 06:40 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ronald Maas | 2020/01/13 08:44 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Anon | 2020/01/13 03:32 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | Ricardo B | 2020/01/13 10:24 AM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | rwessel | 2020/01/13 02:59 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | David Hess | 2020/01/13 06:12 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | rwessel | 2020/01/13 06:28 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | David Hess | 2020/01/13 06:51 PM |
8086 does NOT have those addressing modes | David Hess | 2020/01/13 05:55 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/11 12:26 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Brett | 2020/01/11 02:16 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/11 07:20 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Brett | 2020/01/12 12:02 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/12 09:06 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | Brett | 2020/01/12 10:02 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | James | 2020/01/13 05:12 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Adrian | 2020/01/11 11:38 PM |
PDP-11 | Michael S | 2020/01/12 01:33 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | rwessel | 2020/01/12 06:01 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Ronald Maas | 2020/01/12 10:03 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Konrad Schwarz | 2020/01/13 03:49 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Adrian | 2020/01/13 11:38 PM |
Zilog Z8000 | konrad.schwarz | 2020/01/15 04:50 AM |
Zilog Z8000 | Adrian | 2020/01/15 10:24 PM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/11 06:08 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/11 06:11 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 11:16 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/11 06:17 AM |
It's hard to separate | gallier2 | 2020/01/10 12:11 AM |
It's hard to separate | none | 2020/01/10 01:58 AM |
It's hard to separate | rwessel | 2020/01/09 07:00 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/09 08:10 AM |
It's hard to separate | rwessel | 2020/01/09 08:51 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/08 10:58 PM |
It's hard to separate | rwessel | 2020/01/09 06:31 AM |
It's hard to separate | Adrian | 2020/01/09 06:44 AM |
It's hard to separate | David Hess | 2020/01/09 08:37 AM |
It's hard to separate | none | 2020/01/09 09:34 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Paul A. Clayton | 2020/01/09 02:15 PM |
Yes, they are terrible (NT) | Anon | 2020/01/09 02:20 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/09 11:49 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Etienne | 2020/01/10 01:28 AM |
Are segments so bad? | gallier2 | 2020/01/10 01:37 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/10 02:19 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/10 03:27 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Etienne | 2020/01/10 03:41 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/10 02:05 AM |
Are segments so bad? | gallier2 | 2020/01/10 02:13 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon3 | 2020/01/10 10:37 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/10 10:47 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/11 12:43 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/10 05:51 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/11 12:05 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/11 07:20 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/11 09:14 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/11 08:15 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/11 10:15 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/12 03:18 AM |
Are segments so bad? | anon | 2020/01/12 11:30 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/12 09:19 PM |
the world sucks worse than you're aware of | Michael S | 2020/01/13 12:50 AM |
the world sucks worse than you're aware of | Brendan | 2020/01/13 02:56 AM |
the world sucks worse than you're aware of | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/13 03:46 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/13 06:41 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/13 07:21 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/13 08:43 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/13 12:02 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/13 12:22 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/13 01:50 PM |
actor of around 200? | Michael S | 2020/01/14 02:58 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/14 11:50 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Brendan | 2020/01/14 12:40 PM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 02:17 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Anon | 2020/01/15 03:43 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 04:09 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Anon | 2020/01/15 04:16 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 05:58 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Anon | 2020/01/15 08:08 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/16 03:05 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Michael S | 2020/01/15 03:48 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 04:10 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Michael S | 2020/01/15 07:13 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/15 07:46 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/15 05:08 AM |
Thanks for the info (NT) | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 06:00 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/15 11:30 AM |
OOM killer complains | Anon | 2020/01/15 11:44 AM |
OOM killer complains | anon | 2020/01/15 03:26 PM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Brendan | 2020/01/16 06:26 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/16 09:17 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/16 09:48 AM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Doug S | 2020/01/16 02:41 PM |
Not overcomitting leads to more OOMs, not less | Doug S | 2020/01/16 02:44 PM |
Are segments so bad? | rwessel | 2020/01/13 03:11 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/14 06:37 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/14 07:48 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/14 10:13 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/14 01:30 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brett | 2020/01/14 09:13 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/15 06:04 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 02:35 AM |
Specifying cost of dropping pages | Paul A. Clayton | 2020/01/13 02:00 PM |
Specifying cost of dropping pages | rwessel | 2020/01/13 03:19 PM |
Specifying cost of dropping pages | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 02:23 AM |
Are segments so bad? | anon | 2020/01/14 01:15 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/14 05:13 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/14 11:57 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/14 01:58 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 02:33 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/15 04:24 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/15 05:20 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Etienne | 2020/01/15 04:56 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/15 07:53 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/16 05:12 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/16 09:56 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/15 05:20 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/15 05:56 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/16 06:16 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/16 10:08 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/17 12:52 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/17 09:08 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/18 11:40 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/18 09:13 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/19 11:25 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brett | 2020/01/19 02:18 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brett | 2020/01/19 02:34 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/19 11:57 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/20 04:54 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/20 11:43 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/21 06:01 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/21 05:04 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/22 06:30 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/22 02:56 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/23 07:44 AM |
Are segments so bad? | rwessel | 2020/01/16 02:06 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/16 02:13 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/17 12:51 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/17 02:18 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/17 07:01 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/20 12:06 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/18 02:15 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/19 11:55 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/20 04:30 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/20 07:02 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/20 07:41 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/20 07:45 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/20 08:36 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/20 10:04 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/20 12:22 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/20 01:38 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/20 02:40 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/20 03:35 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Simon Farnsworth | 2020/01/20 04:30 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/20 04:20 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/21 04:08 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/21 05:07 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/22 12:53 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/22 03:32 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/22 06:12 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/22 03:28 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/23 06:36 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/24 06:27 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/24 09:42 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/25 01:46 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/25 07:29 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/26 10:17 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/27 06:55 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/27 03:33 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/28 05:28 AM |
DDS assets and MipMap chains | Montaray Jack | 2020/01/29 02:26 AM |
Are segments so bad? | gallier2 | 2020/01/27 02:58 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/27 05:19 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/25 02:23 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/22 04:52 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/23 12:24 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/23 04:24 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/23 11:43 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/24 03:04 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Etienne | 2020/01/24 05:10 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/23 12:48 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/23 02:48 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/23 06:38 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/23 12:29 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/23 05:08 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/24 08:51 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/23 05:02 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/24 02:57 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/01/24 03:17 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/01/24 08:23 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/02/02 09:15 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/02/03 12:47 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/02/03 01:34 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Gabriele Svelto | 2020/02/03 04:36 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon3 | 2020/02/03 07:47 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon | 2020/02/04 04:49 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/24 09:10 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/17 09:26 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/12 03:18 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/12 07:41 AM |
Are segments so bad? | rwessel | 2020/01/11 12:31 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Anne O. Nymous | 2020/01/11 07:22 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Ricardo B | 2020/01/11 07:01 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/11 11:18 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Michael S | 2020/01/12 01:43 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Adrian | 2020/01/12 03:35 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Ricardo B | 2020/01/12 11:04 AM |
Are segments so bad? | Anon3 | 2020/01/12 04:52 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Brendan | 2020/01/12 08:58 PM |
Are segments so bad? | Paul A. Clayton | 2020/01/13 08:11 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | rainstared | 2020/01/06 12:43 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Foo_ | 2020/01/06 04:33 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | dmcq | 2020/01/06 05:03 AM |
changes in context | Carlie Coats | 2020/01/09 08:06 AM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | rainstar | 2020/01/09 09:16 PM |
No nuances, just buggy code (was: related to Spinlock implementation and the Linux Scheduler) | Montaray Jack | 2020/01/09 10:11 PM |
Suggested reading for the author | anon | 2020/01/04 10:16 PM |
Suggested reading for the author | ab | 2020/01/05 04:15 AM |
Looking at the other side (frequency scaling) | Chester | 2020/01/06 09:19 AM |
Looking at the other side (frequency scaling) | Foo_ | 2020/01/06 10:00 AM |
Why spinlocks were used | Foo_ | 2020/01/06 10:06 AM |
Why spinlocks were used | Jukka Larja | 2020/01/06 11:59 AM |
Why spinlocks were used | Simon Cooke | 2020/01/06 02:16 PM |
Why spinlocks were used | Rizzo | 2020/01/07 12:18 AM |
Looking at the other side (frequency scaling) | ab | 2020/01/07 12:14 AM |
Cross-platform code | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2020/01/06 07:00 AM |
Cross-platform code | Michael S | 2020/01/06 08:11 AM |
Cross-platform code | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2020/01/06 11:33 AM |
Cross-platform code | Michael S | 2020/01/06 12:59 PM |
Cross-platform code | Nksingh | 2020/01/06 11:09 PM |
Cross-platform code | Michael S | 2020/01/07 01:00 AM |
SRW lock implementation | Michael S | 2020/01/07 01:35 AM |
SRW lock implementation | Nksingh | 2020/01/09 01:17 PM |
broken URL in Linux source code | Michael S | 2020/01/14 12:56 AM |
broken URL in Linux source code | Travis Downs | 2020/01/14 09:14 AM |
broken URL in Linux source code | Michael S | 2020/01/14 09:48 AM |
broken URL in Linux source code | Travis Downs | 2020/01/14 03:43 PM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Michael S | 2020/01/14 02:07 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Travis Downs | 2020/01/14 10:06 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | gpderetta | 2020/01/15 03:28 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Travis Downs | 2020/01/15 10:16 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/15 10:20 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Travis Downs | 2020/01/15 10:35 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/16 10:24 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | Konrad Schwarz | 2020/02/05 09:19 AM |
SRW lock implementation - url broken | nksingh | 2020/02/05 01:42 PM |
Cross-platform code | Linus Torvalds | 2020/01/06 12:57 PM |