By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), April 17, 2020 9:12 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
me (me.delete@this.me.com) on April 15, 2020 7:42 pm wrote:
> The models mentioned are almost certainly 28 or more W at base.
I checked out similar processors at 28W (https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/compare.html?productIds=191050,137979).
The best Coffee Lake 28W, 4C parts are 2.7-2.8GHz base clock and 4.5-4.7GHz peak clock. So if a 4C Tiger Lake runs at ~3GHz base, that's pretty solid at 28W and would translate into about 10% frequency gain and then 15% IPC gain over the best in class 4C offering.
But as you say, the question is whether that's 3GHz base or 3GHz peak. 3GHz peak at 28W is unimpressive (even for 15W its meh).
But it does seem like Tiger Lake should be a nice improvement in CPU performance, and a big step forward on graphics and other IP blocks.
Maybe time to upgrade later this year?
David
> The models mentioned are almost certainly 28 or more W at base.
I checked out similar processors at 28W (https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/compare.html?productIds=191050,137979).
The best Coffee Lake 28W, 4C parts are 2.7-2.8GHz base clock and 4.5-4.7GHz peak clock. So if a 4C Tiger Lake runs at ~3GHz base, that's pretty solid at 28W and would translate into about 10% frequency gain and then 15% IPC gain over the best in class 4C offering.
But as you say, the question is whether that's 3GHz base or 3GHz peak. 3GHz peak at 28W is unimpressive (even for 15W its meh).
But it does seem like Tiger Lake should be a nice improvement in CPU performance, and a big step forward on graphics and other IP blocks.
Maybe time to upgrade later this year?
David
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Tiger lake leak, Intel 10nm fixed? | Tiger Lake Leaks | 2020/04/14 09:30 AM |
| Tiger lake leak, Intel 10nm fixed? | anon | 2020/04/14 08:08 PM |
| Tiger lake leak, Intel 10nm fixed? | Wes Felter | 2020/04/15 02:46 PM |
| Keep in mind Intel supposedly fixed their 10nm process at the same time TSMC is ramping up 5nm (NT) | anon | 2020/04/23 10:14 PM |
| 28+ W | me | 2020/04/15 07:42 PM |
| 28+ W | David Kanter | 2020/04/17 09:12 AM |
| 28+ W | another anon | 2020/04/17 11:13 PM |
| 28+ W | Dummond D. Slow | 2020/04/18 09:27 AM |
| 28+ W | David Kanter | 2020/04/19 07:27 PM |
| 28+ W | Anon | 2020/04/19 08:47 PM |
| 28+ W | David Kanter | 2020/04/19 09:50 PM |
| 28+ W | anny | 2020/04/20 05:56 AM |
| 28+ W | Anon | 2020/04/20 08:03 AM |
| 28+ W | wumpus | 2020/04/20 02:39 PM |
| EPYC F line | Anon | 2020/04/20 05:35 PM |
| 28+ W | gallier2 | 2020/04/19 11:44 PM |
| 28+ W | Alberto | 2020/04/20 09:07 AM |
| 28+ W | Adrian | 2020/04/20 09:55 AM |
| 28+ W | Anon | 2020/04/20 02:18 PM |
| 28+ W | Anon3 | 2020/04/20 04:02 PM |
| 28+ W | Dummond D. Slow | 2020/04/20 09:05 PM |
| 28+ W | Adrian | 2020/04/20 03:54 AM |
| This was a comparison to put the "high clock" in context | Dummond D. Slow | 2020/04/20 08:55 AM |