Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 11, 2020 1:31 pm wrote:
> Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on August 11, 2020 12:51 pm wrote:
> > Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org) on August 11, 2020 11:00 am wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://nuviainc.com/blog
> > >
> > >
> > > Various sites, e.g. Anandtech, are commenting on this, but that is the primary link.
> > >
> >
> > Well they use GB5 as their CPU metric, so clearly they're a bunch of phony armchair architects...
> >
> >
>
> That's your only problem?
> Does it means that you believe that they will deliver GB5-ST=2300
> relatively soon? And within 3W envelop, nonetheless?
> If it's true then they are going to become crazy rich crazy quickly.

The graph is somewhat vague. But I can't see GB 2000@4W in eighteen months as being impossible; hell I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple at that level with A15.

I keep telling you all that their remain a bunch of good ideas in architecture (eg SVE2, probably ARMv9) and micro-architecture (every month I post about one of these) that remain unexploited. It's not my fault that every silicon vendor that's not Apple or Nuvia has no ambition, or prioritizes other things (area, short term profits, backwards compatibility) over peak single threaded performance at a few W!