Dummond D. Slow (mental.delete@this.protozoa.us) on August 11, 2020 5:51 pm wrote:
> Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on August 11, 2020 5:34 pm wrote:
> >
>
> > - Tiger Lake hits around 1150 (not great, but a mobile part). Comparing to an Ice Lake Macbook
> > Air (I assume about the target product) it's same ST performance, hopefully better graphics
> > or lower power to justify its existence... It does get 4000 rather than 3000 for MT.
>
>
> > So by end of this year we should expect Apple at maybe 1650 (maybe as high as 1800?
> > maybe for macs but not phones?), AMD at maybe 1600, Intel probably still at 1400.
> >
> > That should give you enough to calibrate what's reasonable and what's nonsense.
> >
>
> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/3236500 ?
>

That's definitely a better TL showing :-)
Here's how it compares to the one I was referencing:

https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/3236500?baseline=815711

Presumably the stepping helps somewhat. Real issue, of course, is what power it takes to hit that 1550 (15W?), and how long it can be sustained in different use cases.
Maybe by the end of the year all three are clustered around 1660..1650?