By: Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org), November 16, 2020 1:46 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Against GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX 560.
Not exactly state of the art, but not exactly ridiculous.
As far as I can tell, these cards are around let's say 75W.
The state of the art is now about twice their performance at about 85W.
So bottom line is Apple's iGPU at, what, 10W? is half the current state of the art for "mid-range, not insane power". Would that be a reasonable summary?
My guess is that next year (beginning of Q2?) we get an 8-large core M1X, for the iMac and MBP/mini pro, with double the GPU resources, and so a credible match for the (reasonable power level) state of the art at ~20W.
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/16/m1-beats-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-and-radeon-rx-560/
Not exactly state of the art, but not exactly ridiculous.
As far as I can tell, these cards are around let's say 75W.
The state of the art is now about twice their performance at about 85W.
So bottom line is Apple's iGPU at, what, 10W? is half the current state of the art for "mid-range, not insane power". Would that be a reasonable summary?
My guess is that next year (beginning of Q2?) we get an 8-large core M1X, for the iMac and MBP/mini pro, with double the GPU resources, and so a credible match for the (reasonable power level) state of the art at ~20W.
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/16/m1-beats-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-and-radeon-rx-560/
