By: Björn Ragnar Björnsson (bjorn.ragnar.delete@this.gmail.com), January 1, 2021 8:41 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Jukka Larja (roskakori2006.delete@this.gmail.com) on January 1, 2021 10:43 am wrote:
> Gabriele Svelto (gabriele.svelto.delete@this.gmail.com) on January 1, 2021 7:10 am wrote:
> > me (me.delete@this.me.com) on December 31, 2020 4:56 pm wrote:
> > > > AMD has their actual server CPU line too, and you do pay more for that privilege, but at least
> > > > AMD doesn't try to screw you over and limit their non-server parts. So you do get ECC for Threadripper
> > > > (and plain Ryzen) too, even if it's not necessarily "officially verified".
> > > >
> > >
> > > You would think that for people who want/need ECC, they
> > > are going to want CPUs that are officially verified.
> >
> > What does "officially" mean in this context? All non-APU
> > Ryzen CPUs support ECC if the motherboards have the
> > necessary traces and UEFI support. Motherboard vendors advertise this support quite clearly in the specs.
>
> Trying to google about how well the unofficial support works, I get lot of hits about people saying that
> yes, it works, without any proof. I don't see people with a test DIMMs known to produce single bit errors
> making sure the unofficial support works, or making sure it works in every CPU or at least gives some easy
> to see error somewhere if it doesn't (I'm sure someone somewhere has tested something, but it gets lost
> in the noise. Anecdotes are only useful if there's enough of them to be statistically significant).
>
> I really like what AMD is doing with CPUs, but unofficial ECC support just
> annoys me. It's supposed to give me peace of mind and eliminate one source
> of random problems. "Unofficial" really doesn't work great with that goal.
>
> -JLarja
Right now on the AMD side, as previously, we have ECC support for DRAM. ECC capable DRAM on the desktop had become nearly extinct as the wast majority of desktop CPUs were Intel and didn't support ECC at all, in any shape manner or form.
Now that the "hot" (not thermally speaking) CPUs are from AMD and they do in fact support ECC, I have the distinct feeling from my wanderings on the Web that desktop ECC offerings are on the rise although I suspect that Crucial/Micron have at the same time been cutting back on their unbuffered ECC selection. Strange times indeed.
I freely admit that I have not made a rigorous study of this market area recently. My excuse is that I'm tired and weary from years and decades of fruitless searching.
I'm fervently hoping that we can see a resurgence in ECC offerings, where, as in the past you would be able to buy Parity/ECC memory at every market point at a 5-20% price premium.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> Gabriele Svelto (gabriele.svelto.delete@this.gmail.com) on January 1, 2021 7:10 am wrote:
> > me (me.delete@this.me.com) on December 31, 2020 4:56 pm wrote:
> > > > AMD has their actual server CPU line too, and you do pay more for that privilege, but at least
> > > > AMD doesn't try to screw you over and limit their non-server parts. So you do get ECC for Threadripper
> > > > (and plain Ryzen) too, even if it's not necessarily "officially verified".
> > > >
> > >
> > > You would think that for people who want/need ECC, they
> > > are going to want CPUs that are officially verified.
> >
> > What does "officially" mean in this context? All non-APU
> > Ryzen CPUs support ECC if the motherboards have the
> > necessary traces and UEFI support. Motherboard vendors advertise this support quite clearly in the specs.
>
> Trying to google about how well the unofficial support works, I get lot of hits about people saying that
> yes, it works, without any proof. I don't see people with a test DIMMs known to produce single bit errors
> making sure the unofficial support works, or making sure it works in every CPU or at least gives some easy
> to see error somewhere if it doesn't (I'm sure someone somewhere has tested something, but it gets lost
> in the noise. Anecdotes are only useful if there's enough of them to be statistically significant).
>
> I really like what AMD is doing with CPUs, but unofficial ECC support just
> annoys me. It's supposed to give me peace of mind and eliminate one source
> of random problems. "Unofficial" really doesn't work great with that goal.
>
> -JLarja
Right now on the AMD side, as previously, we have ECC support for DRAM. ECC capable DRAM on the desktop had become nearly extinct as the wast majority of desktop CPUs were Intel and didn't support ECC at all, in any shape manner or form.
Now that the "hot" (not thermally speaking) CPUs are from AMD and they do in fact support ECC, I have the distinct feeling from my wanderings on the Web that desktop ECC offerings are on the rise although I suspect that Crucial/Micron have at the same time been cutting back on their unbuffered ECC selection. Strange times indeed.
I freely admit that I have not made a rigorous study of this market area recently. My excuse is that I'm tired and weary from years and decades of fruitless searching.
I'm fervently hoping that we can see a resurgence in ECC offerings, where, as in the past you would be able to buy Parity/ECC memory at every market point at a 5-20% price premium.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.