By: Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org), January 9, 2021 1:55 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Maynard Handley (name99.delete@this.name99.org) on January 8, 2021 4:35 pm wrote:
> >
> > This article covers a range of scientific software from the viewpoint of a practitioner who
> > just wants things to work. Summary is that a surprising amount of stuff has already been ported,
> > what's left is mostly in progress, results are almost always remarkably impressive.
> > There are, if you scroll to the very end, SGEMM/DGEMM results for very large matrices,
> > with M1 doing somewhat better than an AMD3900X (which is, I think 12 core).
>
> Goddamn the lack of editing. Forgot the URL:
> https://github.com/neurolabusc/AppleSiliconForNeuroimaging
In single-thread M1 was 25% faster than the old Zen 2, as expected, but in multi-thread the old 12-core AMD was twice faster, also as expected.
> >
> > This article covers a range of scientific software from the viewpoint of a practitioner who
> > just wants things to work. Summary is that a surprising amount of stuff has already been ported,
> > what's left is mostly in progress, results are almost always remarkably impressive.
> > There are, if you scroll to the very end, SGEMM/DGEMM results for very large matrices,
> > with M1 doing somewhat better than an AMD3900X (which is, I think 12 core).
>
> Goddamn the lack of editing. Forgot the URL:
> https://github.com/neurolabusc/AppleSiliconForNeuroimaging
In single-thread M1 was 25% faster than the old Zen 2, as expected, but in multi-thread the old 12-core AMD was twice faster, also as expected.
