Itanium, with a whimper

By: rwessel (rwessel.delete@this.yahoo.com), January 19, 2021 5:45 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
It's hard to believe it's been a quarter century since the first announcements of what would become Itanium, and almost 20 years since the first shipments of Merced (July 2001), but it has.

This past December 31st was the last day HPE would accept orders for Itanium hardware, a few days from now (January 30th) is Intel's official last order date (last shipment date is July 29th, assuming they have any open orders).

Obviously that turned out to be a disaster on all fronts, any hopes for the architecture spoiled by poor performance, terrible execution, poor compatibility, fast advances in x86 land, and impossible demands on compilers.

At least we have to give some credit to Intel (and HP) for trying something different. These days "interesting" discussions about ISAs revolve around such earth-shaking fundamentals as to which ISA has better constant load instructions, or over whose mostly worthless vector extension is slightly less worthless. Bah, humbug.

As they say, "It's dead, Jim".
 Next Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Itanium, with a whimperrwessel2021/01/19 05:45 PM
  Itanium, with a whimperRichard S2021/01/19 06:51 PM
    Itanium, with a whimperChester2021/01/19 07:13 PM
      Itanium, with a whimperaaron spink2021/01/19 10:11 PM
        Itanium, with a whimperanon2021/01/20 01:58 AM
          Itanium, with a whimperDavid Kanter2021/01/20 08:52 AM
            Itanium, with a whimperGionatan Danti2021/01/20 12:53 PM
              Itanium, with a whimperDavid Kanter2021/01/20 04:18 PM
                Poulson queue orderingDavid Kanter2021/01/22 09:44 AM
                  Image URLDavid Kanter2021/01/22 09:45 AM
                  Poulson queue orderingGionatan Danti2021/01/22 01:58 PM
    Itanium, with a whimperrwessel2021/01/19 07:20 PM
      Itanium, with a whimperanon22021/01/19 11:10 PM
        Itanium, with a whimperMichael S2021/01/20 02:50 AM
          Itanium, with a whimperanon22021/01/20 01:42 PM
    Yeah, arguably IA64 was the success AMD needed (NT)Gabriele Svelto2021/01/20 01:16 AM
  Itanium, with a whimperChester2021/01/19 06:55 PM
    Itanium, with a whimperrwessel2021/01/19 07:21 PM
    Itanium, with a whimperRichardC2021/01/19 09:12 PM
      Itanium, with a whimperaaron spink2021/01/19 10:16 PM
        Itanium, with a whimperChester2021/01/19 11:00 PM
          Itanium, with a whimperanon2021/01/20 02:04 AM
            Volta schedulingAnon2021/01/20 03:56 AM
              Volta schedulingwumpus2021/01/20 11:19 AM
                SIMT not SIMD wumpus2021/01/20 11:21 AM
                  SIMT not SIMD Chester2021/01/21 04:44 PM
        GPURichardC2021/01/20 08:46 AM
    Great observationDavid Kanter2021/01/20 08:55 AM
      Great observationChester2021/01/21 04:40 PM
        Great observationanon2021/01/21 08:17 PM
          Great observationBigos2021/01/22 01:52 AM
            Great observationanon2021/01/22 06:58 PM
              Great observationChester2021/01/23 01:51 AM
          GCN isn't VLIWDavid Kanter2021/01/23 11:23 AM
  Itanium, with a whimperanon2021/01/20 12:18 AM
    iAPX 432Brett2021/01/20 05:07 PM
      iAPX 432Rayla2021/01/20 07:22 PM
        iAPX 432anon22021/01/20 08:30 PM
          iAPX 432Tim2021/01/22 12:39 PM
            iAPX 432anon22021/01/22 05:07 PM
              iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/22 06:11 PM
                iAPX 432anon22021/01/22 07:06 PM
                  iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/23 08:47 AM
                    iAPX 432anon22021/01/23 05:12 PM
                      iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/23 06:14 PM
                        iAPX 432anon22021/01/23 07:02 PM
                          iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/24 05:45 AM
                            iAPX 432anon22021/01/24 08:24 PM
                TrustZoneKonrad Schwarz2021/01/23 07:57 PM
                  TrustZonedmcq2021/01/24 05:27 AM
                    TrustZoneKonrad SChwarz2021/01/26 08:27 AM
                      TrustZonedmcq2021/01/26 09:06 AM
                        TrustZonedmcq2021/01/26 12:59 PM
                          TrustZonedmcq2021/01/27 04:39 AM
            iAPX 432anon2021/01/23 04:53 AM
              iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/23 08:52 AM
                iAPX 432anon22021/01/23 05:15 PM
                iAPX 432the original anon2021/01/24 10:04 AM
                  iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/24 01:23 PM
                    iAPX 432anon2021/01/25 07:59 AM
                      iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/25 08:34 AM
        iAPX 432Brett2021/01/20 09:12 PM
          iAPX 432NoSpammer2021/01/21 01:04 AM
          iAPX 432Rayla2021/01/21 06:47 AM
            iAPX 432Brett2021/01/21 10:55 PM
              iAPX 432Mark Roulo2021/01/22 10:42 AM
                iAPX 432anon2021/01/22 03:42 PM
                  iAPX 432wumpus2021/01/22 04:11 PM
                    iAPX 432rwessel2021/01/22 07:21 PM
                    iAPX 432Anon2021/01/23 04:20 AM
                    iAPX 432Adrian2021/01/23 04:30 AM
                      iAPX 432Michael S2021/01/23 12:04 PM
                        68020 and 80386 launch dates ...Mark Roulo2021/01/23 02:54 PM
                        iAPX 432Adrian2021/01/23 03:37 PM
                    iAPX 432Michael S2021/01/23 12:12 PM
                    iAPX 432gallier22021/01/25 01:22 AM
                      TMS 9900Tim2021/01/25 10:21 AM
                        TMS 9900Tim2021/01/25 10:22 AM
                        TMS 9900gallier22021/01/26 02:16 AM
                          TMS 9900incorrector2021/01/26 03:38 AM
                            TMS 9900gallier22021/01/26 05:59 AM
                              TMS 9900Maxwell2021/01/26 07:43 PM
                                TMS 9900gallier22021/01/27 01:11 AM
                                TMS 9900Tim2021/01/28 04:04 PM
          iAPX 432NvaxPlus2021/01/21 07:21 AM
      iAPX 432Veedrac2021/01/21 01:32 AM
      iAPX 432dmcq2021/01/21 05:55 AM
      iAPX 432Jon Masters2021/01/24 07:01 PM
        iAPX 432 - are there any working 432's in existence?Björn Ragnar Björnsson2021/03/08 06:39 PM
          iAPX 432 - are there any working 432's in existence?Björn Ragnar Björnsson2021/03/08 06:48 PM
  PoulsonGionatan Danti2021/01/20 12:42 AM
    Poulsonrwessel2021/01/20 02:17 AM
      PoulsonMichael S2021/01/20 02:30 AM
    PoulsonMichael S2021/01/20 02:41 AM
      PoulsonGionatan Danti2021/01/20 03:57 AM
        PoulsonMichael S2021/01/20 04:07 AM
          Poulson papersMichael S2021/01/22 04:34 AM
            Poulson papersGionatan Danti2021/01/22 08:37 AM
  All the big mistakes were already done.Anon2021/01/20 06:27 PM
    All the big mistakes were already done.Jacob Marley2021/01/20 07:26 PM
      All the big mistakes were already done.David Hess2021/01/24 06:42 AM
        All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/24 07:08 AM
          All the big mistakes were already done.David Hess2021/01/24 09:25 AM
            All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/24 10:31 AM
              All the big mistakes were already done.Anon2021/01/24 11:40 AM
                All the big mistakes were already done.Linus Torvalds2021/01/24 11:54 AM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.Anon2021/01/24 12:10 PM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/24 02:03 PM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.Linus Torvalds2021/01/24 02:37 PM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.Anon2021/01/24 03:13 PM
                        All the big mistakes were already done.Linus Torvalds2021/01/24 05:27 PM
                          All the big mistakes were already done.Ungo2021/01/24 10:24 PM
                            All the big mistakes were already done.TREZA2021/01/25 03:13 PM
                              All the big mistakes were already done.Doug S2021/01/26 11:44 AM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.Brett2021/01/24 04:39 PM
        All the big mistakes were already done.Jon Masters2021/01/24 07:04 PM
          ARM or RISC-V?David Kanter2021/01/24 08:04 PM
            ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/25 09:32 AM
            ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 10:24 AM
              ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/25 10:32 AM
                ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 12:50 PM
              ARM or RISC-V?David Kanter2021/01/25 11:38 AM
                ARM or RISC-V?j2021/01/25 12:38 PM
                  ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 01:06 PM
                    ARM or RISC-V?anonymou52021/01/25 02:08 PM
                      ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 06:07 PM
                        ARM or RISC-V?David Hess2021/01/25 06:28 PM
                          ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 07:28 PM
                ForwardcomJörn Engel2021/01/25 12:45 PM
                  Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/25 02:30 PM
                  ForwardcomHeikki Kultala2021/01/25 02:48 PM
                    Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/25 04:13 PM
                      ForwardcomEtienne Lorrain2021/01/29 02:19 AM
                        Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/29 05:01 AM
                    ForwardcomAnon2021/01/25 04:45 PM
                      Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/25 05:54 PM
                        ForwardcomMarcus2021/01/26 01:16 PM
                    ForwardcomJörn Engel2021/01/28 09:49 PM
                      ForwardcomMarcus2021/01/29 09:40 AM
                        ForwardcomJörn Engel2021/01/29 10:02 AM
                  ForwardcomEtienne Lorrain2021/01/27 05:38 AM
                    Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/27 07:59 AM
                      Forwardcomdmcq2021/01/27 08:08 AM
                ARM or RISC-V?Konrad Schwarz2021/01/26 07:29 AM
              ARM or RISC-V?Heikki Kultala2021/01/25 12:01 PM
                ARM AND RISC-V (NT)juanrga2021/01/26 11:34 AM
              ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/25 03:33 PM
                ARM or RISC-V?Michael S2021/01/25 04:00 PM
                  ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 05:58 PM
                    ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 05:59 PM
                      ARM or RISC-V?j2021/01/26 02:39 AM
                    ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/25 11:47 PM
                  ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/25 06:43 PM
                    ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/25 07:20 PM
                      ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/25 11:39 PM
                        ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/26 02:00 AM
                          Intel looking to buy sifive?anon22021/06/10 10:21 PM
                            Intel looking to buy sifive?none2021/06/10 11:38 PM
                              exactly (NT)Michael S2021/06/11 03:08 AM
                            Intel looking to buy sifive?Doug S2021/06/11 10:48 AM
                    ARM or RISC-V?Heikki Kultala2021/01/26 12:08 AM
                      ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/26 12:24 AM
                        ARM or RISC-V?Heikki Kultala2021/01/26 01:47 AM
                          stupid forum put some strikethorughg on my text (NT)Heikki Kultala2021/01/26 01:47 AM
                          ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/26 02:26 AM
                            PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menHeikki Kultala2021/01/26 03:55 AM
                              PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menanon22021/01/26 05:12 AM
                                PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menanon22021/01/26 05:20 AM
                                PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menHeikki Kultala2021/01/26 07:04 AM
                                  PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menMichael S2021/01/26 08:49 AM
                                    PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menWilco2021/01/26 11:22 AM
                                      You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangepeceed2021/05/05 02:21 PM
                                        You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeanon2021/05/06 11:16 AM
                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAnon2021/05/06 12:06 PM
                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeanon2021/05/06 12:39 PM
                                        You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeWilco2021/05/06 04:03 PM
                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangemy name is potato2021/05/07 03:05 AM
                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeWilco2021/05/07 04:47 AM
                                              You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangepeceed2021/05/07 08:01 AM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeanon2021/05/07 09:51 AM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangenone2021/05/07 11:12 AM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangesylt2021/05/08 04:09 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/08 06:20 AM
                                                    You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangerwessel2021/05/08 09:43 AM
                                                      You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangesylt2021/05/08 01:29 PM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeWilco2021/05/08 06:31 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDactylic2021/05/14 06:40 AM
                                                    You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeGabriele Svelto2021/05/17 05:23 AM
                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess2021/05/11 09:51 PM
                                              You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/11 10:51 PM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeBrett2021/05/12 02:44 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess2021/05/12 08:50 AM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess2021/05/12 08:46 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/12 11:55 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeEtienne Lorrain2021/05/12 01:24 PM
                                                    You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/12 01:57 PM
                                                      You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeEtienne Lorrain2021/05/13 12:59 AM
                                                        You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangerwessel2021/05/13 05:41 AM
                                                    You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess2021/05/13 06:19 AM
                                                      You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangerwessel2021/05/13 06:31 AM
                                                        You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess]2021/05/25 08:10 PM
                                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeMarcus2021/05/25 09:50 PM
                                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/25 10:55 PM
                                                              You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeMarcus2021/05/26 04:21 AM
                                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAnon2021/05/26 01:34 PM
                                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/25 10:45 PM
                                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeMichael S2021/05/26 04:17 AM
                                                              You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/26 08:49 AM
                                                              Link to 8 y.o. discussionMichael S2021/05/26 03:39 PM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDoug S2021/05/12 09:04 AM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeAdrian2021/05/12 12:10 PM
                                                You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeLinus Torvalds2021/05/12 12:00 PM
                                                  You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangepeceed2021/05/15 06:21 AM
                                                    My66000 manuals link? (NT)Anon2021/05/15 07:35 AM
                                                      My66000 manuals link?Marcus2021/05/17 10:15 AM
                                                        My66000 manuals link?Anon2021/05/17 01:06 PM
                                                          My66000 manuals link?Marcus2021/05/17 11:57 PM
                                                    You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeMichael S2021/05/15 10:38 AM
                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangerwessel2021/05/07 11:45 AM
                                          You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangewumpus2021/05/07 02:32 PM
                                            You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeanon2021/05/08 02:06 PM
                                        You don't need more than 4kB conditional branch rangeDavid Hess2021/05/11 09:49 PM
                                    PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menAnon2021/01/26 03:40 PM
                                      PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menMichael S2021/01/27 03:43 AM
                                        PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menKonrad Schwarz2021/01/27 09:27 AM
                                  PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menanon22021/01/27 11:16 PM
                              PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menAdrian2021/01/26 12:25 PM
                              PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menAdrian2021/01/26 12:42 PM
                                PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-mengallier22021/01/27 02:27 AM
                                  PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menAdrian2021/01/27 03:04 AM
                                    PPC is not MIPS, SPACC, Alpha or PA-RISC and your message is full of straw-menKonrad Schwarz2021/01/28 11:25 AM
                        ARM or RISC-V?Michael S2021/01/26 01:50 AM
                          ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/26 02:36 AM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Michael S2021/01/26 03:21 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?incorrector2021/01/26 03:49 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?anon22021/01/26 04:19 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?anon2021/01/26 04:34 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Adrian2021/01/26 01:38 PM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Adrian2021/01/26 01:08 PM
                      ARM or RISC-V?Michael S2021/01/26 01:45 AM
                      ARM or RISC-V?Gabriele Svelto2021/01/27 06:21 AM
                        ARM or RISC-V?Heikki Kultala2021/01/27 10:44 PM
                          ARM or RISC-V?Gabriele Svelto2021/01/28 01:57 AM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Foo_2021/01/28 06:14 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Gabriele Svelto2021/01/28 09:54 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?none2021/01/28 11:41 AM
                                  ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/28 12:16 PM
                                    ARM or RISC-V?gallier22021/01/29 01:54 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Foo_2021/01/28 02:38 PM
                            ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/28 06:47 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Gabriele Svelto2021/01/28 09:56 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/28 03:13 PM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Adrian2021/01/28 01:18 PM
                              ARM or RISC-V?dmcq2021/01/28 03:27 PM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Gabriele Svelto2021/01/29 07:52 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Adrian2021/01/29 09:36 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Wilco2021/01/29 12:53 PM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Anon2021/01/28 04:51 PM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Gionatan Danti2021/01/29 12:49 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Jukka Larja2021/01/29 08:55 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Adrian2021/01/29 10:10 AM
                        ARM or RISC-V?Anon2021/02/16 07:38 AM
                          ARM or RISC-V?Carson2021/02/16 04:55 PM
                          ARM or RISC-V?anon2021/02/17 04:27 PM
                            ARM or RISC-V?Anon2021/02/17 05:03 PM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Jouni Osmala2021/02/17 10:01 PM
                                ARM or RISC-V?anon2021/02/18 03:37 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Anon2021/02/18 04:44 AM
                              ARM or RISC-V?Maik2021/02/18 03:30 AM
                                ARM or RISC-V?Maik2021/02/18 03:41 AM
              ARM or RISC-V?Konrad Schwarz2021/01/26 07:25 AM
                ARM or RISC-V?Jon Masters2021/01/26 08:54 PM
        All the big mistakes were already done.Jacob Marley2021/01/26 01:03 AM
          All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/26 08:34 AM
    All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/21 08:23 AM
      All the big mistakes were already done.rwessel2021/01/21 11:00 AM
        All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/22 05:40 AM
          All the big mistakes were already done.Linus Torvalds2021/01/22 11:14 AM
            The future of vectorization is hopefulanon2021/01/22 02:00 PM
              The future of vectorization is hopefuldmcq2021/01/22 05:38 PM
                The future of vectorization is hopefuldmcq2021/01/23 03:17 AM
                  The future of vectorization is hopefulanon2021/01/23 03:50 AM
                    The future of vectorization is hopefuldmcq2021/01/23 07:09 AM
              The future of vectorization is hopefulJukka Larja2021/01/22 09:59 PM
                The future of vectorization is hopefulFoo_2021/01/23 07:14 AM
                  The future of vectorization is hopefulJukka Larja2021/01/23 09:34 AM
                    The future of vectorization is hopefulMichael S2021/01/23 01:49 PM
                The future of vectorization is hopefuldmcq2021/01/23 07:48 AM
            All the big mistakes were already done.Jörn Engel2021/01/22 03:00 PM
            All the big mistakes were already done.Marcus2021/01/23 12:50 AM
              All the big mistakes were already done.anon2021/01/23 02:21 AM
                All the big mistakes were already done.Michael S2021/01/23 01:56 PM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.Marcus2021/01/24 12:37 AM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.Michael S2021/01/24 04:54 AM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.Marcus2021/01/24 07:11 AM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.gallier22021/01/25 01:56 AM
            All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/24 02:00 AM
              All the big mistakes were already done.Jukka Larja2021/01/24 03:02 AM
                All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/24 08:21 AM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.Jukka Larja2021/01/24 11:31 AM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/24 10:24 PM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.Jukka Larja2021/01/25 07:09 AM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.Anon2021/01/24 12:02 PM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/24 02:25 PM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.Jukka Larja2021/01/25 07:20 AM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.anon2021/01/24 10:27 PM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/25 12:02 AM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.rwessel2021/01/25 06:24 PM
                      AVX512 futureMichael S2021/01/26 02:13 AM
                        AVX512 futureAnon2021/01/26 08:51 AM
                          AVX512 futureme2021/01/26 11:10 AM
                        AVX512 future-.-2021/01/26 04:39 PM
                  All the big mistakes were already done.Gabriele Svelto2021/01/25 03:04 AM
                    All the big mistakes were already done.Jouni Osmala2021/01/25 04:52 AM
                      All the big mistakes were already done.dmcq2021/01/25 08:02 AM
            All the big mistakes were already done.2021/01/24 03:49 AM
              You just want to waste 21 or 49 bits for no gainHeikki Kultala2021/01/24 05:05 AM
                You just want to waste 21 or 49 bits for no gain2021/01/24 08:38 AM
                  Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no senseHeikki Kultala2021/01/24 11:18 AM
                    Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sense2021/01/25 08:28 AM
                      Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no senseHeikki Kultala2021/01/26 12:33 AM
                        better SIMD ISAs are possiblehobold2021/01/26 03:28 AM
                          Altivec@NXPMichael S2021/01/26 05:13 AM
                          better SIMD ISAs are possibleschmide2021/01/26 01:33 PM
                          better SIMD ISAs are possible-.-2021/01/26 04:26 PM
                            better SIMD ISAs are possibledmcq2021/01/26 05:59 PM
                        Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sense2021/01/26 03:52 AM
                          Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no senseHeikkI Kultala2021/01/26 04:50 AM
                            Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sensedmcq2021/01/26 07:02 AM
                            Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sense2021/01/26 09:45 AM
                              Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sensedmcq2021/01/26 10:12 AM
                                Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sense2021/01/27 12:21 PM
                                  Your "partially vectorized" is slower than scalar implementation - makes no sensedmcq2021/01/27 03:03 PM
                                  Could you please learn even the BASICs of how processor pipelines work?Heikki Kultala2021/01/27 03:17 PM
                                    Out-of-order superscalar == MIMD2021/01/27 05:01 PM
                                      Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDdmcq2021/01/27 05:37 PM
                                        Out-of-order superscalar == MIMD2021/01/27 09:10 PM
                                        Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDwumpus2021/01/28 09:53 AM
                                          Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDMark2021/01/28 11:54 AM
                                            Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDdmcq2021/01/28 12:27 PM
                                            Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDKevin G2021/05/06 04:09 PM
                                              Out-of-order superscalar == MIMDUngo2021/05/06 07:04 PM
                You just want to waste 21 or 49 bits for no gainAnon2021/01/24 12:20 PM
          All the big mistakes were already done.rwessel2021/01/22 03:02 PM
            All the big mistakes were already done.Michael S2021/01/24 02:45 AM
              All the big mistakes were already done.anon2021/01/24 03:38 AM
        All the big mistakes were already done.David Hess2021/01/24 07:04 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?