By: juanrga (nomail.delete@this.juanrga.com), April 9, 2021 3:44 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com) on April 8, 2021 12:48 am wrote:
> juanrga (nomail.delete@this.juanrga.com) on April 8, 2021 12:15 am wrote:
> > Rome uses 7HPC node to achieve higher clocks; a Cortex A72 achieves 4.2GHz on the same node. The
> > comment made by Marwel is about the size difference "for the same process node technology".
>
> Those are extraordinary claims, do you have extraordinary evidences?
I reproduced Marvell's quote, so I guess you mean the claims about 7HPC.
Rome using 7HPC:
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/microarchitectures/zen_2#Process_technology
Cortex A72 achieving 4.2GHz on 7HPC:
https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2446/tsmc-demonstrates-a-7nm-arm-based-chiplet-design-for-hpc/
> juanrga (nomail.delete@this.juanrga.com) on April 8, 2021 12:15 am wrote:
> > Rome uses 7HPC node to achieve higher clocks; a Cortex A72 achieves 4.2GHz on the same node. The
> > comment made by Marwel is about the size difference "for the same process node technology".
>
> Those are extraordinary claims, do you have extraordinary evidences?
I reproduced Marvell's quote, so I guess you mean the claims about 7HPC.
Rome using 7HPC:
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/microarchitectures/zen_2#Process_technology
Cortex A72 achieving 4.2GHz on 7HPC:
https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2446/tsmc-demonstrates-a-7nm-arm-based-chiplet-design-for-hpc/